Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience.

Q1 Health Professions
Diabetic Foot & Ankle Pub Date : 2019-11-28 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2000625X.2019.1696012
Luca Dalla Paola, Paolo Cimaglia, Anna Carone, Giuseppe Scavone, Giulio Boscarino, Davide Bernucci, Paolo Sbarzaglia, Stefano Censi, Roberto Ferrari, Gianluca Campo
{"title":"Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience.","authors":"Luca Dalla Paola, Paolo Cimaglia, Anna Carone, Giuseppe Scavone, Giulio Boscarino, Davide Bernucci, Paolo Sbarzaglia, Stefano Censi, Roberto Ferrari, Gianluca Campo","doi":"10.1080/2000625X.2019.1696012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To describe the characteristics, the management and the outcome of a consecutive series of patients with diabetic foot lesions (DF) and no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI) treated with a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach in a dedicated center. <b>Research Design and Methods</b>: The prospective database of the Diabetic Foot Unit of the Maria Cecilia Hospital (Cotignola, Italy) collects medical history, risk factors, chemistry values, angiographic data, characteristic of foot lesions, medical and surgical therapies of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of DF and CLI. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year and/or total recovery. The primary endpoint was 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS), secondary endpoints were limb salvage and survival. <b>Results</b>: Between October 2014 and October 2017, 1024 patients with DF and CLI were admitted to the center. Eighty-four of them (8.2%) fulfilled the criteria for no-option CLI. At 1 year, AFS, limb salvage, and survival rates were 34%, 34%, and 83%, respectively. Lesions located proximal to the Lisfranc joint were associated with major amputation (HR 2.1 [1.2-3.6]). One-year survival of patients treated with minor procedures was significantly higher compared to patients treated with major amputation (96% vs 76%, log-rank p = 0.019). Major amputation was independently associated with mortality (HR 7.83 [1.02-59.89]). <b>Conclusions</b>: The application of dedicated and standardized strategies permitted limb salvage in one-third of patients with no-option CLI. Patients with stable lesions limited to the forefoot and without ischaemic pain had a greater probability to successfully receive conservative treatments. Limb salvage was associated with subsequent higher one-year survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2000625X.2019.1696012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics, the management and the outcome of a consecutive series of patients with diabetic foot lesions (DF) and no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI) treated with a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach in a dedicated center. Research Design and Methods: The prospective database of the Diabetic Foot Unit of the Maria Cecilia Hospital (Cotignola, Italy) collects medical history, risk factors, chemistry values, angiographic data, characteristic of foot lesions, medical and surgical therapies of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of DF and CLI. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year and/or total recovery. The primary endpoint was 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS), secondary endpoints were limb salvage and survival. Results: Between October 2014 and October 2017, 1024 patients with DF and CLI were admitted to the center. Eighty-four of them (8.2%) fulfilled the criteria for no-option CLI. At 1 year, AFS, limb salvage, and survival rates were 34%, 34%, and 83%, respectively. Lesions located proximal to the Lisfranc joint were associated with major amputation (HR 2.1 [1.2-3.6]). One-year survival of patients treated with minor procedures was significantly higher compared to patients treated with major amputation (96% vs 76%, log-rank p = 0.019). Major amputation was independently associated with mortality (HR 7.83 [1.02-59.89]). Conclusions: The application of dedicated and standardized strategies permitted limb salvage in one-third of patients with no-option CLI. Patients with stable lesions limited to the forefoot and without ischaemic pain had a greater probability to successfully receive conservative treatments. Limb salvage was associated with subsequent higher one-year survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

糖尿病患者无选择性危重肢体缺血的肢体抢救:专业中心的经验成果。
目的描述糖尿病足病变(DF)和无选择性危重肢体缺血(CLI)患者的特征、管理以及在一家专门中心接受多维度、跨学科治疗的连续系列结果。研究设计与方法:玛丽亚-塞西莉亚医院(意大利科蒂尼奥拉)糖尿病足科的前瞻性数据库收集了所有诊断为DF和CLI患者的病史、风险因素、化学值、血管造影数据、足部病变特征、药物和手术疗法。所有患者均接受了至少一年的随访和/或完全康复。主要终点是1年无截肢存活率(AFS),次要终点是肢体挽回率和存活率。结果:2014年10月至2017年10月期间,该中心共收治了1024名DF和CLI患者。其中84人(8.2%)符合无选择性CLI标准。1年后,AFS、肢体挽救率和存活率分别为34%、34%和83%。位于Lisfranc关节近端的病变与大截肢有关(HR 2.1 [1.2-3.6])。接受小手术治疗的患者的一年生存率明显高于接受大截肢治疗的患者(96% vs 76%,log-rank p = 0.019)。大截肢与死亡率密切相关(HR 7.83 [1.02-59.89])。结论:采用专门的标准化策略可以挽救三分之一无选择性CLI患者的肢体。病变稳定、局限于前足且无缺血性疼痛的患者更有可能成功接受保守治疗。肢体抢救与随后较高的一年存活率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetic Foot & Ankle
Diabetic Foot & Ankle ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信