Lymphangiographic Interventions to Manage Postoperative Chylothorax.

Q3 Medicine
Hyuncheol Jeong, Hyo Yeong Ahn, Hoon Kwon, Yeong Dae Kim, Jeong Su Cho, Jungseop Eom
{"title":"Lymphangiographic Interventions to Manage Postoperative Chylothorax.","authors":"Hyuncheol Jeong,&nbsp;Hyo Yeong Ahn,&nbsp;Hoon Kwon,&nbsp;Yeong Dae Kim,&nbsp;Jeong Su Cho,&nbsp;Jungseop Eom","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative chylothorax may be caused by iatrogenic injury of the collateral lymphatic ducts after thoracic surgery. Although traditional treatment could be considered in most cases, resolution may be slow. Radiological interventions have recently been developed to manage postoperative chylothorax. This study aimed to compare radiological interventions and conservative management in patients with postoperative chylothorax.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed periprocedural drainage time, length of hospital stay, and nil per os (NPO) duration in 7 patients who received radiological interventions (intervention group [IG]) and in 9 patients who received conservative management (non-intervention group [NG]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the patients in the IG and NG were comparable; however, the median drainage time and median length of hospital stay after detection of chylothorax were significantly shorter in the IG than in the NG (6 vs. 10 days, p=0.036 and 10 vs. 20 days, p=0.025, respectively). NPO duration after chylothorax detection and total drainage duration were somewhat shorter in the IG than in the NG (5 vs. 7 days and 8 vs. 14 days, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that radiological interventions reduced the duration of drainage and the length of hospital stay, allowing an earlier return to normal life. To overcome several limitations of this study, a prospective, randomized controlled trial with a larger number of patients is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"52 6","pages":"409-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/60/44/kjtcv-52-409.PMC6901187.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Postoperative chylothorax may be caused by iatrogenic injury of the collateral lymphatic ducts after thoracic surgery. Although traditional treatment could be considered in most cases, resolution may be slow. Radiological interventions have recently been developed to manage postoperative chylothorax. This study aimed to compare radiological interventions and conservative management in patients with postoperative chylothorax.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed periprocedural drainage time, length of hospital stay, and nil per os (NPO) duration in 7 patients who received radiological interventions (intervention group [IG]) and in 9 patients who received conservative management (non-intervention group [NG]).

Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients in the IG and NG were comparable; however, the median drainage time and median length of hospital stay after detection of chylothorax were significantly shorter in the IG than in the NG (6 vs. 10 days, p=0.036 and 10 vs. 20 days, p=0.025, respectively). NPO duration after chylothorax detection and total drainage duration were somewhat shorter in the IG than in the NG (5 vs. 7 days and 8 vs. 14 days, respectively).

Conclusion: This study showed that radiological interventions reduced the duration of drainage and the length of hospital stay, allowing an earlier return to normal life. To overcome several limitations of this study, a prospective, randomized controlled trial with a larger number of patients is recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

淋巴管造影介入治疗术后乳糜胸。
背景:胸外科手术后侧支淋巴管的医源性损伤可能引起术后乳糜胸。虽然在大多数情况下可以考虑传统治疗,但解决可能很慢。放射治疗最近被用于治疗术后乳糜胸。本研究旨在比较术后乳糜胸患者的放射治疗和保守治疗。方法:回顾性分析7例接受放射治疗的患者(干预组[IG])和9例接受保守治疗的患者(非干预组[NG])的围术期引流时间、住院时间和NPO时间。结果:IG和NG患者的基线特征具有可比性;而发现乳糜胸后IG组的中位引流时间和中位住院时间均显著短于NG组(分别为6天和10天,p=0.036和10天和20天,p=0.025)。乳糜胸检测后的NPO持续时间和总引流时间在IG组略短于NG组(分别为5天和7天,8天和14天)。结论:本研究表明,放射干预减少了引流时间和住院时间,使患者早日恢复正常生活。为了克服本研究的一些局限性,建议进行前瞻性、随机对照试验,纳入更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信