The association between mode of birth delivery and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review protocol of epidemiological evidence.

Q3 Medicine
Jitka Klugarová, Kateřina Janoušková, Martin Procházka, Jan Hálek, Věra Šibravová, Miloslav Klugar
{"title":"The association between mode of birth delivery and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review protocol of epidemiological evidence.","authors":"Jitka Klugarová,&nbsp;Kateřina Janoušková,&nbsp;Martin Procházka,&nbsp;Jan Hálek,&nbsp;Věra Šibravová,&nbsp;Miloslav Klugar","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caesarean section is currently the most frequently performed intervention after episiotomy in obstetrics and one of the most common abdominal operations overall. Rates of caesarean section have been rising globally. Given the increasing rate worldwide it is therefore necessary and important to understand how caesarean section affects child development. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioural disorder in children. ADHD is characterized by a combination of symptoms including inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Caesarean section may affect psychological development through changes in microbiota or stress response, and birth by caesarean section can be associated with a small increased risk of ADHD. In the current literature, there is no systematic review or protocol of the systematic review answering the question of whether the mode of delivery has influence on the risk of ADHD development.The objective of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence regarding the epidemiological association between the mode of delivery (caesarean section versus vaginal delivery) as exposure and ADHD as the outcome.A three-step strategy will be utilized in this review, aiming to find both published and unpublished studies. The initial search will be conducted using the MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE. The second search will involve 21 databases and sources. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement analysis of title, abstracts and full texts, critical appraisal and data extraction will be carried out on selected studies using standardized instruments developed by Joanna Briggs Institute. All steps will be performed by two independent reviewers. If possible, statistical meta-analysis using Joanna Briggs Institute within the System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information will be pooled. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed.The results will be disseminated by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethical assessment is not needed - we will search/evaluate the existing sources of literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":55996,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000176","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Caesarean section is currently the most frequently performed intervention after episiotomy in obstetrics and one of the most common abdominal operations overall. Rates of caesarean section have been rising globally. Given the increasing rate worldwide it is therefore necessary and important to understand how caesarean section affects child development. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioural disorder in children. ADHD is characterized by a combination of symptoms including inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Caesarean section may affect psychological development through changes in microbiota or stress response, and birth by caesarean section can be associated with a small increased risk of ADHD. In the current literature, there is no systematic review or protocol of the systematic review answering the question of whether the mode of delivery has influence on the risk of ADHD development.The objective of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence regarding the epidemiological association between the mode of delivery (caesarean section versus vaginal delivery) as exposure and ADHD as the outcome.A three-step strategy will be utilized in this review, aiming to find both published and unpublished studies. The initial search will be conducted using the MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE. The second search will involve 21 databases and sources. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement analysis of title, abstracts and full texts, critical appraisal and data extraction will be carried out on selected studies using standardized instruments developed by Joanna Briggs Institute. All steps will be performed by two independent reviewers. If possible, statistical meta-analysis using Joanna Briggs Institute within the System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information will be pooled. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed.The results will be disseminated by publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. Ethical assessment is not needed - we will search/evaluate the existing sources of literature.

分娩方式与注意缺陷/多动障碍之间的关系:流行病学证据的系统审查方案。
剖宫产是目前产科会阴切开术后最常见的干预措施,也是最常见的腹部手术之一。全球剖宫产率一直在上升。鉴于世界范围内剖宫产率的上升,因此了解剖宫产如何影响儿童发育是必要和重要的。注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是儿童中最常见的神经行为障碍。多动症的特点是注意力不集中、冲动和多动等症状的结合。剖宫产可能通过改变微生物群或应激反应来影响心理发育,剖宫产可能与多动症风险的小幅增加有关。在目前的文献中,没有系统评价或系统评价的方案来回答分娩方式是否对ADHD发展风险有影响的问题。本综述的目的是综合现有的关于分娩方式(剖腹产或阴道分娩)暴露与ADHD结局之间的流行病学关联的最佳证据。本综述将采用三步策略,旨在找到已发表和未发表的研究。初步检索将使用MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE进行。第二次搜索将涉及21个数据库和资源。根据标题、摘要和全文的首选报告项目和meta分析声明分析,将使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所开发的标准化工具对选定的研究进行批判性评估和数据提取。所有步骤将由两名独立评审员执行。如果可能,将使用信息统一管理、评估和审查系统内的乔安娜布里格斯研究所进行统计荟萃分析。将评估统计异质性。研究结果将在同行评议的期刊上发表。不需要伦理评估-我们将搜索/评估现有的文献来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: ​​The International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare is the official journal of the Joanna Briggs Institute. It is a fully refereed journal that publishes manuscripts relating to evidence-based medicine and evidence-based practice. It publishes papers containing reliable evidence to assist health professionals in their evaluation and decision-making, and to inform health professionals, students and researchers of outcomes, debates and developments in evidence-based medicine and healthcare. ​ The journal provides a unique home for publication of systematic reviews (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence) and implementation projects including the synthesis, transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice. Original scholarly work relating to the synthesis (translation science), transfer (distribution) and utilization (implementation science and evaluation) of evidence to inform multidisciplinary healthcare practice is considered for publication. The journal also publishes original scholarly commentary pieces relating to the generation and synthesis of evidence for practice and quality improvement, the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, and the process of conducting systematic reviews (methodology) which covers quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence methods. In addition, the journal’s content includes implementation projects including the transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice as well as providing a forum for the debate of issues surrounding evidence-based healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信