Comparison of Quetiapine Abuse and Misuse Reports to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System With Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics.

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2019-05-01 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178221819844205
Kirk E Evoy, Chengwen Teng, Victor G Encarnacion, Brian Frescas, John Hakim, Stephen Saklad, Christopher R Frei
{"title":"Comparison of Quetiapine Abuse and Misuse Reports to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System With Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics.","authors":"Kirk E Evoy,&nbsp;Chengwen Teng,&nbsp;Victor G Encarnacion,&nbsp;Brian Frescas,&nbsp;John Hakim,&nbsp;Stephen Saklad,&nbsp;Christopher R Frei","doi":"10.1177/1178221819844205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are assumed to have little abuse potential. However, reports of quetiapine abuse have emerged as prescribing has increased in recent years. The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) provides postmarketing information regarding adverse drug events (ADEs). This is the first study to analyze quetiapine abuse-related ADEs reported to FAERS to determine whether a disproportionate rate of such events have been reported when compared with other commonly used SGAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of FAERS data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, was performed. The total number of all-cause and abuse-related ADEs reported to FAERS regarding quetiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone were identified, along with demographic and mortality data. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was calculated to assess disproportionate reporting of abuse-related adverse drug reactions between quetiapine and each of three alternative SGA medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abuse-related ADEs represented 11% (3144/27 962) of total ADEs reported for quetiapine, 8% for olanzapine (1548/19 228), 5% (1380/29 699) for aripiprazole, and 3% (1168/45 518) for risperidone. The PRRs (95% confidence interval) for quetiapine versus olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone were 1.40 (1.32-1.48), 2.42 (2.28-2.57), and 4.38 (4.10-4.68), respectively, indicating that abuse-related events were significantly more likely to be reported with quetiapine than each comparator drug. In addition, more deaths were reported among the abuse-related events regarding quetiapine (673) than olanzapine (200), aripiprazole (88), and risperidone (143).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study corroborates recent evidence indicating that quetiapine might possess a significantly higher abuse potential than other commonly used SGAs. Although prospective studies are needed to better understand the abuse potential of quetiapine, increased vigilance in monitoring for signs of substance abuse might be warranted when prescribing quetiapine.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"13 ","pages":"1178221819844205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178221819844205","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221819844205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are assumed to have little abuse potential. However, reports of quetiapine abuse have emerged as prescribing has increased in recent years. The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) provides postmarketing information regarding adverse drug events (ADEs). This is the first study to analyze quetiapine abuse-related ADEs reported to FAERS to determine whether a disproportionate rate of such events have been reported when compared with other commonly used SGAs.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of FAERS data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, was performed. The total number of all-cause and abuse-related ADEs reported to FAERS regarding quetiapine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone were identified, along with demographic and mortality data. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was calculated to assess disproportionate reporting of abuse-related adverse drug reactions between quetiapine and each of three alternative SGA medications.

Results: Abuse-related ADEs represented 11% (3144/27 962) of total ADEs reported for quetiapine, 8% for olanzapine (1548/19 228), 5% (1380/29 699) for aripiprazole, and 3% (1168/45 518) for risperidone. The PRRs (95% confidence interval) for quetiapine versus olanzapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone were 1.40 (1.32-1.48), 2.42 (2.28-2.57), and 4.38 (4.10-4.68), respectively, indicating that abuse-related events were significantly more likely to be reported with quetiapine than each comparator drug. In addition, more deaths were reported among the abuse-related events regarding quetiapine (673) than olanzapine (200), aripiprazole (88), and risperidone (143).

Conclusion: This study corroborates recent evidence indicating that quetiapine might possess a significantly higher abuse potential than other commonly used SGAs. Although prospective studies are needed to better understand the abuse potential of quetiapine, increased vigilance in monitoring for signs of substance abuse might be warranted when prescribing quetiapine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

奎硫平滥用和滥用报告与美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统与其他第二代抗精神病药物的比较。
背景:第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs)被认为几乎没有滥用的可能性。然而,随着近年来处方的增加,奎硫平滥用的报告也出现了。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的不良事件报告系统(FAERS)提供有关不良药物事件(ADE)的上市后信息。这是第一项分析向FAERS报告的喹硫平滥用相关ADE的研究,以确定与其他常用的SGA相比,此类事件的报告率是否不成比例。方法:对2015年1月1日至2017年12月31日的FAERS数据进行横断面分析。确定了向FAERS报告的关于喹硫平、奥氮平、阿立哌唑和利培酮的全因和滥用相关ADE的总数,以及人口统计和死亡率数据。计算比例报告比率(PRR),以评估喹硫平与三种替代SGA药物之间滥用相关药物不良反应的不成比例的报告。结果:与滥用相关的ADE占11%(3144/27 962),奥氮平为8%(1548/19 228),5%(1380/29 699)和3%(1168/45 518)治疗利培酮。喹硫平与奥氮平、阿立哌唑和利培酮的PRR(95%置信区间)分别为1.40(1.32-1.48)、2.42(2.28-2.57)和4.38(4.10-4.68),表明喹硫平比每种对照药物更容易报告滥用相关事件。此外,据报道,与奥氮平(200)、阿立哌唑(88)和利培酮(143)相比,喹硫平(673)的滥用相关事件中的死亡人数更多。结论:本研究证实了最近的证据,表明喹硫平可能比其他常用的SGA具有更高的滥用潜力。尽管需要进行前瞻性研究来更好地了解喹硫平的滥用潜力,但在开具喹硫平处方时,可能需要提高对药物滥用迹象监测的警惕性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信