Dania Hudhud, Haytham Allaham, Mohammad Eniezat, Tariq Enezate
{"title":"Safety of performing transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with oesophageal varices.","authors":"Dania Hudhud, Haytham Allaham, Mohammad Eniezat, Tariq Enezate","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2019-011223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oesophageal varices (EV) are one of the complications of liver cirrhosis that carries a risk of rupture and bleeding. The safety of performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with pre-existing EV is not well described in literature. Therefore, this retrospective study has been conducted to evaluate the safety of preforming TEE in this group of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was extracted from the 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Data using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System for EV, TEE and in-hospital outcomes. Study endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay, postprocedural gastrointestinal bleeding and oesophageal perforation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 328 discharges with a diagnosis of EV were identified, among which 242 had a TEE performed during the index hospitalisation. Mean age was 58.3 years, 36.6% female. In comparison to the no-TEE group, the TEE group was associated with comparable in-hospital all-cause mortality (7.0% vs 6.7%, p=0.86) and bleeding (0.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.75); however, TEE group was associated with longer hospital stay (14.9 days vs 6.9 days, p<0.01). There were no reported oesophageal perforations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEE is not a common procedure performed in patients with pre-existing EV. TEE seems to be a safe diagnostic tool for evaluation of heart diseases in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":" ","pages":"e011223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011223","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-011223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Introduction: Oesophageal varices (EV) are one of the complications of liver cirrhosis that carries a risk of rupture and bleeding. The safety of performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with pre-existing EV is not well described in literature. Therefore, this retrospective study has been conducted to evaluate the safety of preforming TEE in this group of patients.
Methods: The study population was extracted from the 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Data using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System for EV, TEE and in-hospital outcomes. Study endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay, postprocedural gastrointestinal bleeding and oesophageal perforation.
Results: A total of 81 328 discharges with a diagnosis of EV were identified, among which 242 had a TEE performed during the index hospitalisation. Mean age was 58.3 years, 36.6% female. In comparison to the no-TEE group, the TEE group was associated with comparable in-hospital all-cause mortality (7.0% vs 6.7%, p=0.86) and bleeding (0.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.75); however, TEE group was associated with longer hospital stay (14.9 days vs 6.9 days, p<0.01). There were no reported oesophageal perforations.
Conclusions: TEE is not a common procedure performed in patients with pre-existing EV. TEE seems to be a safe diagnostic tool for evaluation of heart diseases in this group of patients.
简介:食管静脉曲张(EV)是肝硬化的并发症之一,有破裂和出血的危险。经食管超声心动图(TEE)的安全性在已有EV的患者中没有很好的文献描述。因此,本回顾性研究旨在评估在这组患者中预TEE的安全性。方法:采用国际疾病分类第十版、EV、TEE和院内结局的临床修改/程序编码系统,从2016年全国再入院数据中提取研究人群。研究终点包括院内全因死亡率、住院时间、术后消化道出血和食管穿孔。结果:共鉴定出81 328例诊断为EV的出院患者,其中242例在指数住院期间进行TEE检查。平均年龄58.3岁,女性占36.6%。与非TEE组相比,TEE组与相当的院内全因死亡率(7.0% vs 6.7%, p=0.86)和出血(0.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.75)相关;然而,TEE组与更长的住院时间相关(14.9天vs 6.9天)。结论:TEE不是预先存在的EV患者的常见手术。TEE似乎是评估这类患者心脏病的一种安全的诊断工具。