Preoperative joint aspiration culture results and causative pathogens in total hip and knee prosthesis infections: mind the gap.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-05 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2019.1611718
Peter Declercq, Jeroen Neyt, Melissa Depypere, Stefanie Goris, Eric Van Wijngaerden, Jan Verhaegen, Joost Wauters, Isabel Spriet
{"title":"Preoperative joint aspiration culture results and causative pathogens in total hip and knee prosthesis infections: mind the gap.","authors":"Peter Declercq,&nbsp;Jeroen Neyt,&nbsp;Melissa Depypere,&nbsp;Stefanie Goris,&nbsp;Eric Van Wijngaerden,&nbsp;Jan Verhaegen,&nbsp;Joost Wauters,&nbsp;Isabel Spriet","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2019.1611718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there is no consensus about the utility of the preoperative joint aspiration culture to guide antimicrobial treatment. The main objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of these preoperative samples to narrow immediate postoperative empirical antimicrobial treatment in patients with a knee or hip PJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients admitted for an exchange procedure between June 2007 and July 2016 for whom a preoperative joint aspiration within 6 months prior to the procedure was available and with an antibiotic-free interval before sampling, were eligible. Per PJI, taking both preoperative joint aspiration and intraoperative deep samples into account, causative pathogen(s) were assessed by the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Per PJI, agreement of preoperative joint aspiration cultures corresponding to the causative pathogen(s) was investigated both on species and on Gram/fungi level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 85 PJIs, on species level, the total agreement was found in 58 (68%) PJIs. On Gram/fungi level, when preoperative joint aspiration cultures yielded exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms (n = 61), a 100% predictive value for Gram positive causing pathogens was attained. Insufficient predictive value was observed in PJIs with preoperative joint aspiration yielding Gram-negative microorganisms (n = 4), a fungus (n = 1) or with sterile results (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the immediate postoperative setting, the treating team might consider a broad spectrum empirical antibiotic regime, guided by the local epidemiology and susceptibility, which can be narrowed to Gram-positive coverage if preoperative joint aspiration cultures yield exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":"75 4","pages":"284-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17843286.2019.1611718","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1611718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: In prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there is no consensus about the utility of the preoperative joint aspiration culture to guide antimicrobial treatment. The main objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of these preoperative samples to narrow immediate postoperative empirical antimicrobial treatment in patients with a knee or hip PJI.

Methods: Adult patients admitted for an exchange procedure between June 2007 and July 2016 for whom a preoperative joint aspiration within 6 months prior to the procedure was available and with an antibiotic-free interval before sampling, were eligible. Per PJI, taking both preoperative joint aspiration and intraoperative deep samples into account, causative pathogen(s) were assessed by the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Per PJI, agreement of preoperative joint aspiration cultures corresponding to the causative pathogen(s) was investigated both on species and on Gram/fungi level.

Results: From the 85 PJIs, on species level, the total agreement was found in 58 (68%) PJIs. On Gram/fungi level, when preoperative joint aspiration cultures yielded exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms (n = 61), a 100% predictive value for Gram positive causing pathogens was attained. Insufficient predictive value was observed in PJIs with preoperative joint aspiration yielding Gram-negative microorganisms (n = 4), a fungus (n = 1) or with sterile results (n = 19).

Conclusion: In the immediate postoperative setting, the treating team might consider a broad spectrum empirical antibiotic regime, guided by the local epidemiology and susceptibility, which can be narrowed to Gram-positive coverage if preoperative joint aspiration cultures yield exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms.

全髋关节和膝关节假体感染的术前关节抽吸培养结果和致病菌:注意间隙。
目的:在假体关节感染(PJIs)中,术前关节抽吸培养指导抗菌治疗的效用尚未达成共识。本回顾性研究的主要目的是探讨这些术前样本对缩小膝关节或髋关节PJI患者术后立即经验性抗菌治疗的价值。方法:纳入2007年6月至2016年7月间接受交换手术的成年患者,术前6个月内可进行术前关节抽吸,且取样前无抗生素间隔。根据PJI,考虑到术前关节抽吸和术中深部样本,根据现行美国传染病学会(IDSA)指南评估致病病原体。根据PJI,在物种和革兰氏菌/真菌水平上调查了术前关节滴吸培养与致病病原体的一致性。结果:85个pji中,有58个(68%)的pji在物种水平上完全一致。在革兰氏/真菌水平上,当术前关节抽吸培养只产生革兰氏阳性微生物(n = 61)时,革兰氏阳性致病菌的预测值达到100%。术前关节抽滴产生革兰氏阴性微生物(n = 4)、真菌(n = 1)或无菌结果(n = 19)的PJIs预测价值不足。结论:在术后立即,治疗团队可以考虑广谱经验性抗生素方案,以当地流行病学和易感性为指导,如果术前联合滴注培养只产生革兰氏阳性微生物,则可将其缩小到革兰氏阳性覆盖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信