Confounders in Adenoma Detection at Initial Screening Colonoscopy: A Factor in the Assessment of Racial Disparities as a Risk for Colon Cancer.

Journal of Cancer Therapy Pub Date : 2019-04-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-09 DOI:10.4236/jct.2019.104022
Yakira David, Lorenzo Ottaviano, Jihye Park, Sadat Iqbal, Michelle Likhtshteyn, Samir Kumar, Helen Lyo, Ayanna E Lewis, Brandon E Lung, Jesse T Frye, Li Huang, Ellen Li, Jie Yang, Laura Martello, Shivakumar Vignesh, Joshua D Miller, Michele Follen, Evan B Grossman
{"title":"Confounders in Adenoma Detection at Initial Screening Colonoscopy: A Factor in the Assessment of Racial Disparities as a Risk for Colon Cancer.","authors":"Yakira David,&nbsp;Lorenzo Ottaviano,&nbsp;Jihye Park,&nbsp;Sadat Iqbal,&nbsp;Michelle Likhtshteyn,&nbsp;Samir Kumar,&nbsp;Helen Lyo,&nbsp;Ayanna E Lewis,&nbsp;Brandon E Lung,&nbsp;Jesse T Frye,&nbsp;Li Huang,&nbsp;Ellen Li,&nbsp;Jie Yang,&nbsp;Laura Martello,&nbsp;Shivakumar Vignesh,&nbsp;Joshua D Miller,&nbsp;Michele Follen,&nbsp;Evan B Grossman","doi":"10.4236/jct.2019.104022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer is persistently highest in Black/African-Americans in the United States. While access to care, barriers to screening, and poverty might explain these findings, there is increased interest in examining biological factors that impact the colonic environment. Our group is examining biologic factors that contribute to disparities in development of adenomas prospectively. In preparation for this and to characterize a potential patient population, we conducted a retrospective review of initial screening colonoscopies in a cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on initial average risk screening colonoscopies on patients (age 45-75 years) during 2012 at three institutions. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between potential risk factors and the detection of adenomas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2225 initial screening colonoscopies 1495 (67.2%) were performed on Black/African-Americans and 566 (25.4%) on Caucasians. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that older age, male sex, current smoking and teaching gastroenterologists were associated with higher detection of adenomas and these were less prevalent among Black/African-Americas except for age. Neither race, ethnicity, BMI, diabetes mellitus, HIV nor insurance were associated with adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample, there was no association between race and adenoma detection. While this may be due to a lower prevalence of risk factors for adenomas in this sample, our findings were confounded by a lower detection rate by consultant gastroenterologists at one institution. The study allowed us to rectify the problem and characterize patients for future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Therapy","volume":"10 4","pages":"269-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482964/pdf/nihms-1023684.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2019.104022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and aims: The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer is persistently highest in Black/African-Americans in the United States. While access to care, barriers to screening, and poverty might explain these findings, there is increased interest in examining biological factors that impact the colonic environment. Our group is examining biologic factors that contribute to disparities in development of adenomas prospectively. In preparation for this and to characterize a potential patient population, we conducted a retrospective review of initial screening colonoscopies in a cohort of patients.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on initial average risk screening colonoscopies on patients (age 45-75 years) during 2012 at three institutions. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between potential risk factors and the detection of adenomas.

Results: Of the 2225 initial screening colonoscopies 1495 (67.2%) were performed on Black/African-Americans and 566 (25.4%) on Caucasians. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that older age, male sex, current smoking and teaching gastroenterologists were associated with higher detection of adenomas and these were less prevalent among Black/African-Americas except for age. Neither race, ethnicity, BMI, diabetes mellitus, HIV nor insurance were associated with adenoma detection.

Conclusion: In this sample, there was no association between race and adenoma detection. While this may be due to a lower prevalence of risk factors for adenomas in this sample, our findings were confounded by a lower detection rate by consultant gastroenterologists at one institution. The study allowed us to rectify the problem and characterize patients for future trials.

结肠镜初始筛查中腺瘤检测的混杂因素:种族差异作为结肠癌风险评估的一个因素。
背景和目的:美国黑人/非裔美国人的结直肠癌发病率和死亡率一直是最高的。虽然获得护理、筛查障碍和贫困可能解释这些发现,但人们对研究影响结肠环境的生物因素的兴趣越来越大。我们小组正在研究导致腺瘤发展差异的生物学因素。为了准备这一研究并确定潜在患者群体的特征,我们对一组患者的初始结肠镜筛查进行了回顾性回顾。方法:回顾性分析2012年三家机构患者(年龄45-75岁)的初始平均风险筛查结肠镜检查。使用描述性统计和多变量logistic回归模型来检验潜在危险因素与腺瘤检测之间的关系。结果:在2225例初始结肠镜筛查中,1495例(67.2%)为黑人/非裔美国人,566例(25.4%)为白种人。多变量logistic回归显示,年龄较大、男性、当前吸烟和胃肠病学教授与腺瘤的高检出率相关,而这些在黑人/非裔美洲人中不太普遍,除了年龄。种族、民族、BMI、糖尿病、HIV和保险均与腺瘤检测无关。结论:在这个样本中,种族与腺瘤检测没有关联。虽然这可能是由于该样本中腺瘤的危险因素发生率较低,但我们的发现与一家机构的胃肠病学顾问的较低检出率相混淆。这项研究使我们能够纠正这个问题,并为未来的试验确定患者的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信