First Impressions Online: The Inclusion of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Identities and Services in Mental Healthcare Providers' Online Materials in the USA.

Q1 Social Sciences
Natalie R Holt, Debra A Hope, Richard Mocarski, Nathan Woodruff
{"title":"First Impressions Online: The Inclusion of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Identities and Services in Mental Healthcare Providers' Online Materials in the USA.","authors":"Natalie R Holt,&nbsp;Debra A Hope,&nbsp;Richard Mocarski,&nbsp;Nathan Woodruff","doi":"10.1080/15532739.2018.1428842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When accessing mental healthcare services, transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) individuals face systemic barriers to gender-affirmative care. Initial points of contact, like intake forms, may show limited consideration for the heterogeneity of TGNC identities and can lead to negative consequences prior to face-to-face interaction with providers.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The first aim was to mimic a likely pathway a TGNC individual may follow to seek mental healthcare services in the USA and to describe the extent to which they may encounter enacted stigma or affirmative messages that may impede or facilitate access to care. The second aim was to determine if a positive State legal climate for TGNC people was associated with more affirmative provider materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content analysis was used to examine a national sample of websites and intake forms of mental healthcare providers who advertise online as working with TGNC clients. Intake forms were coded for usage of affirmative language in gender/sex questions and including questions for a client's pronouns and preferred name. Websites were coded for mentioning a variety of services or resources for TGNC clients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While provider websites were found through Google searches for a \"gender therapist,\" only 56.6% of websites stated a provider specialty to work with TGNC clients and 32.1% of websites had no mention of services or resources for TGNC people. Additionally, a significantly larger proportion of intake forms from States with legal protections for TGNC people used affirmative language in gender/sex questions and asked for a client's pronouns than intake forms from States without legal protections.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Barriers to affirmative healthcare for TGNC people within patient and provider interactions have been identified in previous research and these data show TGNC individuals may face enacted stigma even in their search for a provider, particularly those TGNC people living in States without legal protections.</p>","PeriodicalId":56012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgenderism","volume":"20 1","pages":"49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2018.1428842","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgenderism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1428842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: When accessing mental healthcare services, transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) individuals face systemic barriers to gender-affirmative care. Initial points of contact, like intake forms, may show limited consideration for the heterogeneity of TGNC identities and can lead to negative consequences prior to face-to-face interaction with providers.

Aims: The first aim was to mimic a likely pathway a TGNC individual may follow to seek mental healthcare services in the USA and to describe the extent to which they may encounter enacted stigma or affirmative messages that may impede or facilitate access to care. The second aim was to determine if a positive State legal climate for TGNC people was associated with more affirmative provider materials.

Methods: Content analysis was used to examine a national sample of websites and intake forms of mental healthcare providers who advertise online as working with TGNC clients. Intake forms were coded for usage of affirmative language in gender/sex questions and including questions for a client's pronouns and preferred name. Websites were coded for mentioning a variety of services or resources for TGNC clients.

Results: While provider websites were found through Google searches for a "gender therapist," only 56.6% of websites stated a provider specialty to work with TGNC clients and 32.1% of websites had no mention of services or resources for TGNC people. Additionally, a significantly larger proportion of intake forms from States with legal protections for TGNC people used affirmative language in gender/sex questions and asked for a client's pronouns than intake forms from States without legal protections.

Discussion: Barriers to affirmative healthcare for TGNC people within patient and provider interactions have been identified in previous research and these data show TGNC individuals may face enacted stigma even in their search for a provider, particularly those TGNC people living in States without legal protections.

在线第一印象:在美国精神卫生保健提供者的在线材料中包含跨性别和不符合性别的身份和服务。
背景:在获得心理健康服务时,跨性别者和性别不合规者(TGNC)在获得性别平权护理方面面临系统性障碍。最初的接触点,如录取表格,可能对TGNC身份的异质性考虑有限,并可能在与提供者面对面互动之前导致负面后果。目的:第一个目的是模拟TGNC个人在美国寻求心理健康服务时可能遵循的途径,并描述他们可能在多大程度上遇到可能阻碍或促进获得护理的既定污名或肯定信息。第二个目的是确定TGNC人的积极国家法律氛围是否与更积极的提供者材料有关。方法:内容分析用于检查全国范围内的网站样本和精神卫生保健提供者的录取表格,这些提供者在网上宣传与TGNC客户合作。录取表格被编码为在性别/性别问题中使用肯定性语言,包括客户代词和首选名称的问题。网站被编码为提及TGNC客户的各种服务或资源。结果:虽然提供者网站是通过谷歌搜索“性别治疗师”找到的,但只有56.6%的网站表示提供者有与TGNC客户合作的专业,32.1%的网站没有提及TGNC人员的服务或资源。此外,来自对TGNC有法律保护的州的录取表格中,有很大一部分人在性别/性问题上使用了肯定性语言,并询问了客户的代词,而不是来自没有法律保护的国家的录取表格。讨论:先前的研究已经确定了TGNC人员在患者和提供者互动中获得肯定性医疗保健的障碍,这些数据表明,TGNC个人即使在寻找提供者时也可能面临既定的耻辱,尤其是那些生活在没有法律保护的州的TGNC人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transgenderism
International Journal of Transgenderism Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Transgenderism, together with its partner organization the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), offers an international, multidisciplinary scholarly forum for publication in the field of transgender health in its broadest sense for academics, practitioners, policy makers, and the general population. The journal welcomes contributions from a range of disciplines, such as: Endocrinology Surgery Obstetrics and Gynaecology Psychiatry Psychology Speech and language therapy Sexual medicine Sexology Family therapy Public health Sociology Counselling Law Medical ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信