Women on Hormone Therapy with Ischemic Stroke, Effects on Deficits and Recovery.

Aliza Brown, Jordan Wells, Sanjeeva Onteddu, Gwendolyn Bryant-Smith, Rohan Sharma, Renee Joiner, Krishna Nalleballe, Gloria Richard-Davis, Sen Sheng, Tina Benton, William Culp, Curtis Lowery
{"title":"Women on Hormone Therapy with Ischemic Stroke, Effects on Deficits and Recovery.","authors":"Aliza Brown,&nbsp;Jordan Wells,&nbsp;Sanjeeva Onteddu,&nbsp;Gwendolyn Bryant-Smith,&nbsp;Rohan Sharma,&nbsp;Renee Joiner,&nbsp;Krishna Nalleballe,&nbsp;Gloria Richard-Davis,&nbsp;Sen Sheng,&nbsp;Tina Benton,&nbsp;William Culp,&nbsp;Curtis Lowery","doi":"10.31531/edwiser.jnnpr.1000103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hormone replacement therapy (HT) for post-menopausal women is associated with increased incidence of ischemic stroke risk. Effects of HT on stroke related deficits and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are uncertain. We retrospectively examined female consult data for HT use and National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) at baseline and recovery for 2015 and 2016 in a large stroke telemedicine program.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The age of women who acknowledged HT use will negatively impact stroke severity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed consult data from two consecutive years for all women and included HT use, current age, and baseline and 24 h NIHSS's. We included all women consults regardless of IV Alteplase treatment. 24 h NIHSS and three month modified Rankin scale (mRS) were included from women given IV Alteplase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Strokes were identified in 523 women and 244 women received Alteplase therapy. Women without HT use numbered 459 and 64 women listed HT use. Mean NIHSS scores regardless of HT use significantly improved 24 h NIHSS vs. baseline NIHSS (p<0.0001). Baseline NIHSS scores were significantly improved in women on HT vs. non-HT users (p=0.01) in women age 50 to 79 years. Although mean NIHSS scores at 24h was not different from HT to no HT use (4.9</i> ± <i>1.6 vs. 7.8</i> ± <i>0.6, p=0.08) a trend was present for lower NIHSS scores for women 50-79 years. The mRS scores at three months indicated significant improvements among HT users vs. non-HT use (1.46 ± 0.4 vs. 2.51 ± 0.2, p=0.05).</i></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While cautions persist on the use, route and dosage of HT for risks of ischemic stroke, the HT moderation of AIS deficits and outcomes in women <80 years of age warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":92673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology, neurosurgery & psychiatry research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology, neurosurgery & psychiatry research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31531/edwiser.jnnpr.1000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hormone replacement therapy (HT) for post-menopausal women is associated with increased incidence of ischemic stroke risk. Effects of HT on stroke related deficits and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are uncertain. We retrospectively examined female consult data for HT use and National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) at baseline and recovery for 2015 and 2016 in a large stroke telemedicine program.

Hypothesis: The age of women who acknowledged HT use will negatively impact stroke severity and outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed consult data from two consecutive years for all women and included HT use, current age, and baseline and 24 h NIHSS's. We included all women consults regardless of IV Alteplase treatment. 24 h NIHSS and three month modified Rankin scale (mRS) were included from women given IV Alteplase.

Results: Strokes were identified in 523 women and 244 women received Alteplase therapy. Women without HT use numbered 459 and 64 women listed HT use. Mean NIHSS scores regardless of HT use significantly improved 24 h NIHSS vs. baseline NIHSS (p<0.0001). Baseline NIHSS scores were significantly improved in women on HT vs. non-HT users (p=0.01) in women age 50 to 79 years. Although mean NIHSS scores at 24h was not different from HT to no HT use (4.9 ± 1.6 vs. 7.8 ± 0.6, p=0.08) a trend was present for lower NIHSS scores for women 50-79 years. The mRS scores at three months indicated significant improvements among HT users vs. non-HT use (1.46 ± 0.4 vs. 2.51 ± 0.2, p=0.05).

Conclusion: While cautions persist on the use, route and dosage of HT for risks of ischemic stroke, the HT moderation of AIS deficits and outcomes in women <80 years of age warrants further investigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

女性缺血性脑卒中激素治疗对缺陷和恢复的影响。
背景:绝经后妇女激素替代疗法(HT)与缺血性卒中风险增加相关。在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)中,HT对卒中相关缺陷和功能结局的影响尚不确定。我们回顾性地检查了2015年和2016年大型卒中远程医疗项目中女性HT使用和美国国立卫生研究院卒中评分(NIHSS)基线和恢复时的咨询数据。假设:承认使用HT的女性的年龄将对中风的严重程度和结果产生负面影响。方法:我们分析了所有女性连续两年的咨询数据,包括HT使用情况、当前年龄、基线和24小时NIHSS。我们纳入了所有的女性咨询,无论静脉注射阿替普酶治疗。对静脉注射阿替普酶的妇女进行24 h NIHSS和3个月修正Rankin评分(mRS)。结果:523名女性中风,244名接受阿替普酶治疗。459名未使用HT的妇女和64名使用HT的妇女。与基线NIHSS相比,无论HT使用与否,NIHSS平均评分均显著提高(p±1.6 vs. 7.8±0.6,p=0.08), 50-79岁女性的NIHSS评分有降低的趋势。3个月mRS评分显示HT使用者比非HT使用者有显著改善(1.46±0.4比2.51±0.2,p=0.05)。结论:HT的使用、途径和剂量对缺血性卒中风险、女性AIS缺陷和预后的调节作用仍需谨慎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信