Trans-Iliac Aortic Valve Replacement: Feasibility, Safety, and Medium-Term Follow-up.

Open journal of cardiovascular surgery Pub Date : 2019-06-02 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179065219853582
Marco Gennari, Piero Trabattoni, Mauro Pepi, Gianluca Polvani, Luca Salvi, Marco Agrifoglio
{"title":"Trans-Iliac Aortic Valve Replacement: Feasibility, Safety, and Medium-Term Follow-up.","authors":"Marco Gennari,&nbsp;Piero Trabattoni,&nbsp;Mauro Pepi,&nbsp;Gianluca Polvani,&nbsp;Luca Salvi,&nbsp;Marco Agrifoglio","doi":"10.1177/1179065219853582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is nowadays generally accepted as the treatment of choice for high- to intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for the standard surgical replacement. Many vascular accesses have been described for the valve delivery, comprising the common iliac artery as the arterial site of access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2008 to June 2014, 440 patients underwent TAVR at our institution. We report a series of 12 patients that have undergone TAVR via a trans-iliac (TI) retroperitoneal surgical approach and also discuss its feasibility, security, and medium-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-day survival rate was 92%. Only 1 local vascular access major complication occurred requiring an iliac-femoral bypass grafting with a vascular graft. Two patients experienced transient neurological ischemic attack. At 3-year follow-up, all the 11 patients were alive and well and the echocardiographic evaluation revealed good function of the prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TI route seems to be feasible with a low profile of local complications. It may be a reasonable access alternative to the femoral artery and to the trans-apical approach. A broader, prospective study is advisable to gain general consensus on this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":90668,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1179065219853582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179065219853582","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179065219853582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is nowadays generally accepted as the treatment of choice for high- to intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for the standard surgical replacement. Many vascular accesses have been described for the valve delivery, comprising the common iliac artery as the arterial site of access.

Methods: From September 2008 to June 2014, 440 patients underwent TAVR at our institution. We report a series of 12 patients that have undergone TAVR via a trans-iliac (TI) retroperitoneal surgical approach and also discuss its feasibility, security, and medium-term follow-up.

Results: The 30-day survival rate was 92%. Only 1 local vascular access major complication occurred requiring an iliac-femoral bypass grafting with a vascular graft. Two patients experienced transient neurological ischemic attack. At 3-year follow-up, all the 11 patients were alive and well and the echocardiographic evaluation revealed good function of the prosthesis.

Conclusions: The TI route seems to be feasible with a low profile of local complications. It may be a reasonable access alternative to the femoral artery and to the trans-apical approach. A broader, prospective study is advisable to gain general consensus on this approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经髂主动脉瓣置换术:可行性、安全性和中期随访。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)目前被普遍接受为不适合标准手术置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄的高至中危患者的治疗选择。许多血管通路已被描述为瓣膜输送,包括髂总动脉作为动脉通路。方法:2008年9月至2014年6月,440例患者在我院行TAVR手术。我们报告了12例经髂(TI)腹膜后手术入路行TAVR的患者,并讨论了其可行性、安全性和中期随访。结果:30天生存率为92%。仅发生1例局部血管通路严重并发症,需行髂股旁路血管移植术。2例患者出现短暂性神经缺血发作。随访3年,11例患者均存活,超声心动图评价显示假体功能良好。结论:TI路径可行,局部并发症少。这可能是股动脉和经根尖入路的一个合理的替代入路。建议对这种方法进行更广泛的前瞻性研究以获得普遍共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信