Quality Initiative to Improve Compliance With Perioperative Anticoagulation.

Q1 Nursing
Journal of Oncology Practice Pub Date : 2019-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-17 DOI:10.1200/JOP.18.00748
Elizabeth B Pelkofski, William D Baker, John C Rowlingson, Leigh A Cantrell, Linda R Duska
{"title":"Quality Initiative to Improve Compliance With Perioperative Anticoagulation.","authors":"Elizabeth B Pelkofski,&nbsp;William D Baker,&nbsp;John C Rowlingson,&nbsp;Leigh A Cantrell,&nbsp;Linda R Duska","doi":"10.1200/JOP.18.00748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in gynecologic oncology surgical patients. Many centers use neuraxial analgesia (NA), which affects the timing of prophylactic anticoagulation. In 2012, we determined that the rate of VTE in patients undergoing laparotomy with NA was higher than in those who received alternative pain control. In addition, compliance with preoperative anticoagulation guidelines was only 40%. We undertook a quality initiative (QI) project to increase compliance to 80% in NA cases and maintain 90% in non-NA cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary working group designed and deployed a QI intervention bundle. Compliance was defined as the receipt of a prophylactic dose of anticoagulant within 1 hour after NA or before skin incision regardless of anesthesia type. Data were abstracted from the medical record after the study period. Cases from the year before QI were used for comparison. Primary outcome was compliance and secondary outcome was the rate of VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred women were treated under the QI project and 182 historical cases (HCs) were used for comparison. Overall compliance improved (96% QI <i>v</i> 73% HC; <i>P</i> < .001). This difference was marked in cases with NA (95% QI <i>v</i> 40% HC; <i>P</i> < .001) and remained stable in non-NA cases (97% QI <i>v</i> 91% HC; <i>P</i> = .29). The overall rate of VTE, independent of anesthesia type, remained unchanged (2.1% HC <i>v</i> 0% QI; <i>P</i> = .3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relatively simple and inexpensive initiatives to improve routine processes within the surgical pathway are feasible and attract staff participation. Such efforts are likely to translate into greater levels of patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"15 9","pages":"e835-e842"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JOP.18.00748","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in gynecologic oncology surgical patients. Many centers use neuraxial analgesia (NA), which affects the timing of prophylactic anticoagulation. In 2012, we determined that the rate of VTE in patients undergoing laparotomy with NA was higher than in those who received alternative pain control. In addition, compliance with preoperative anticoagulation guidelines was only 40%. We undertook a quality initiative (QI) project to increase compliance to 80% in NA cases and maintain 90% in non-NA cases.

Methods: A multidisciplinary working group designed and deployed a QI intervention bundle. Compliance was defined as the receipt of a prophylactic dose of anticoagulant within 1 hour after NA or before skin incision regardless of anesthesia type. Data were abstracted from the medical record after the study period. Cases from the year before QI were used for comparison. Primary outcome was compliance and secondary outcome was the rate of VTE.

Results: One hundred women were treated under the QI project and 182 historical cases (HCs) were used for comparison. Overall compliance improved (96% QI v 73% HC; P < .001). This difference was marked in cases with NA (95% QI v 40% HC; P < .001) and remained stable in non-NA cases (97% QI v 91% HC; P = .29). The overall rate of VTE, independent of anesthesia type, remained unchanged (2.1% HC v 0% QI; P = .3).

Conclusion: Relatively simple and inexpensive initiatives to improve routine processes within the surgical pathway are feasible and attract staff participation. Such efforts are likely to translate into greater levels of patient safety.

提高围手术期抗凝依从性的质量倡议。
目的:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是妇科肿瘤手术患者发病和死亡的主要原因。许多中心使用神经轴镇痛(NA),这会影响预防性抗凝的时机。在2012年,我们确定在接受NA的剖腹手术患者中静脉血栓栓塞的发生率高于接受其他疼痛控制的患者。此外,术前抗凝指南的依从性仅为40%。我们开展了一个质量倡议(QI)项目,将NA病例的符合性提高到80%,在非NA病例中保持90%。方法:一个多学科工作组设计并部署了一个QI干预包。依从性定义为在麻醉后1小时内或皮肤切开前接受预防性剂量的抗凝剂,而不考虑麻醉类型。数据从研究期后的病历中提取。以普查前一年的个案作比较。主要结果是依从性,次要结果是静脉血栓栓塞率。结果:100名妇女在QI项目下接受治疗,182例历史病例(hc)用于比较。总体依从性提高(96% QI vs 73% HC;P < 0.001)。这种差异在NA病例中很明显(95% QI vs 40% HC;P < 0.001),并且在非na病例中保持稳定(97% QI vs 91% HC;P = .29)。与麻醉类型无关,静脉血栓栓塞总发生率保持不变(2.1% HC vs 0% QI;P = .3)。结论:在外科路径内采取相对简单和廉价的措施改善常规流程是可行的,并能吸引员工参与。这些努力很可能转化为更高水平的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信