Using topic modeling to infer the emotional state of people living with Parkinson's disease.

Andrew P Valenti, Meia Chita-Tegmark, Linda Tickle-Degnen, Alexander W Bock, Matthias J Scheutz
{"title":"Using topic modeling to infer the emotional state of people living with Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Andrew P Valenti,&nbsp;Meia Chita-Tegmark,&nbsp;Linda Tickle-Degnen,&nbsp;Alexander W Bock,&nbsp;Matthias J Scheutz","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2019.1623342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) often exhibit facial masking (hypomimia), which causes reduced facial expressiveness. This can make it difficult for those who interact with the person to correctly read their emotional state and can lead to problematic social and therapeutic interactions. In this article, we develop a probabilistic model for an assistive device, which can automatically infer the emotional state of a person with PD using the topics that arise during the course of a conversation. We envision that the model can be situated in a device that could monitor the emotional content of the interaction between the caregiver and a person living with PD, providing feedback to the caregiver in order to correct their immediate and perhaps incorrect impressions arising from a reliance on facial expressions. We compare and contrast two approaches: using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) generative model as the basis for an unsupervised learning tool, and using a human-crafted sentiment analysis tool, the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). We evaluated both approaches using standard machine learning performance metrics such as precision, recall, and <math><mrow><msub><mi>F</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow></math>scores. Our performance analysis of the two approaches suggests that LDA is a suitable classifier when the word count in a document is approximately that of the average sentence, i.e., 13 words. In that case, the LDA model correctly predicts the interview category 86% of the time and LIWC correctly predicts it 29% of the time. On the other hand, when tested with interviews with an average word count of 303 words, the LDA model correctly predicts the interview category 56% of the time and LIWC, 74% of the time. Advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":" ","pages":"136-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2019.1623342","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1623342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) often exhibit facial masking (hypomimia), which causes reduced facial expressiveness. This can make it difficult for those who interact with the person to correctly read their emotional state and can lead to problematic social and therapeutic interactions. In this article, we develop a probabilistic model for an assistive device, which can automatically infer the emotional state of a person with PD using the topics that arise during the course of a conversation. We envision that the model can be situated in a device that could monitor the emotional content of the interaction between the caregiver and a person living with PD, providing feedback to the caregiver in order to correct their immediate and perhaps incorrect impressions arising from a reliance on facial expressions. We compare and contrast two approaches: using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) generative model as the basis for an unsupervised learning tool, and using a human-crafted sentiment analysis tool, the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). We evaluated both approaches using standard machine learning performance metrics such as precision, recall, and F1scores. Our performance analysis of the two approaches suggests that LDA is a suitable classifier when the word count in a document is approximately that of the average sentence, i.e., 13 words. In that case, the LDA model correctly predicts the interview category 86% of the time and LIWC correctly predicts it 29% of the time. On the other hand, when tested with interviews with an average word count of 303 words, the LDA model correctly predicts the interview category 56% of the time and LIWC, 74% of the time. Advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches are discussed.

运用主题建模来推断帕金森病患者的情绪状态。
帕金森氏症(PD)患者经常表现出面部掩蔽(低面孔症),这导致面部表情减少。这可能会使那些与患者互动的人难以正确解读他们的情绪状态,并可能导致有问题的社交和治疗互动。在本文中,我们为辅助设备开发了一个概率模型,该模型可以使用对话过程中出现的主题自动推断PD患者的情绪状态。我们设想,该模型可以放置在一个设备中,该设备可以监控护理人员和PD患者之间互动的情感内容,并向护理人员提供反馈,以纠正他们因依赖面部表情而产生的直接或可能不正确的印象。我们比较和对比了两种方法:使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)生成模型作为无监督学习工具的基础,以及使用人工制作的情感分析工具,语言查询和单词计数(LIWC)。我们使用标准的机器学习性能指标(如精度、召回率和F1scores)来评估这两种方法。我们对这两种方法的性能分析表明,当文档中的单词计数近似于平均句子(即13个单词)时,LDA是一种合适的分类器。在这种情况下,LDA模型正确预测面试类别的概率为86%,而LIWC正确预测的概率为29%。另一方面,当对平均字数为303个单词的访谈进行测试时,LDA模型正确预测访谈类别的准确率为56%,LIWC的准确率为74%。讨论了这两种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信