Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C viral infection. Real-life experience in Bahrain.

IF 2.6 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2019-05-13 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/HMER.S190967
Maheeba Abdulla, Hamed Ali, Hafsa Nass, Jawad Khamis, Jehad AlQamish
{"title":"Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C viral infection. Real-life experience in Bahrain.","authors":"Maheeba Abdulla,&nbsp;Hamed Ali,&nbsp;Hafsa Nass,&nbsp;Jawad Khamis,&nbsp;Jehad AlQamish","doi":"10.2147/HMER.S190967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. This study aims to establish real-world treatment efficacy of Sofosbuvir-based (SOF-B) and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir-based (OPR-B) regimens. <b>Patients and methods:</b> This prospective, non-randomized observational real-life study was conducted in Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, and included consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection (genotypes 1-4) who were treated with direct-acting antivirals. Sustained virologic response to therapy was assessed at week 12 post end of treatment (SVR12). <b>Results:</b> Of the 167 patients included, 60.5% (n=101) were treated with SOF-B and 39.5% (n=66) with OPR-B regimens for 12 weeks (n=148; 88.6%) or 24 weeks (n=19; 11.4%). SVR12 was achieved in 156 (93.4%) patients, 4 patients failed to achieve SVR despite completion of treatment, and 7 patients discontinued treatment due to non-compliance and were included in the analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. There was no difference between SOF-B and OPR-B regimens (95/101; 94.1%) and (61/66; 92.4%), respectively (<i>p</i>=0.68). However, SVR12 rates were significantly higher in patients without liver cirrhosis (103/104; 99.0%) compared to patients with cirrhosis (53/63; 84.1%; <i>p</i><0.001), and in patients who received 12-week-regimen (141/148; 95.3%) compared to those who received 24-week regimen (15/19; 78.9%; <i>p</i><0.024). However, logistic regression analysis identified cirrhosis at baseline to be the only independent predictor of non-SVR12 (OR: 16.1, 95% confidence interval 1.96-131.91, <i>p</i>=0.01). Apart from Hb, INR, and ALP, all other laboratory parameter improved following treatment (<i>p</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Both SOF-B and OPR-B regimens achieved high SVR12 rates in this real-life cohort of patients with chronic HCV infection, similar to what is reported in other real-world studies. Cirrhosis was the only independent predictor of poor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12917,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/HMER.S190967","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S190967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. This study aims to establish real-world treatment efficacy of Sofosbuvir-based (SOF-B) and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir-based (OPR-B) regimens. Patients and methods: This prospective, non-randomized observational real-life study was conducted in Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, and included consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection (genotypes 1-4) who were treated with direct-acting antivirals. Sustained virologic response to therapy was assessed at week 12 post end of treatment (SVR12). Results: Of the 167 patients included, 60.5% (n=101) were treated with SOF-B and 39.5% (n=66) with OPR-B regimens for 12 weeks (n=148; 88.6%) or 24 weeks (n=19; 11.4%). SVR12 was achieved in 156 (93.4%) patients, 4 patients failed to achieve SVR despite completion of treatment, and 7 patients discontinued treatment due to non-compliance and were included in the analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. There was no difference between SOF-B and OPR-B regimens (95/101; 94.1%) and (61/66; 92.4%), respectively (p=0.68). However, SVR12 rates were significantly higher in patients without liver cirrhosis (103/104; 99.0%) compared to patients with cirrhosis (53/63; 84.1%; p<0.001), and in patients who received 12-week-regimen (141/148; 95.3%) compared to those who received 24-week regimen (15/19; 78.9%; p<0.024). However, logistic regression analysis identified cirrhosis at baseline to be the only independent predictor of non-SVR12 (OR: 16.1, 95% confidence interval 1.96-131.91, p=0.01). Apart from Hb, INR, and ALP, all other laboratory parameter improved following treatment (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both SOF-B and OPR-B regimens achieved high SVR12 rates in this real-life cohort of patients with chronic HCV infection, similar to what is reported in other real-world studies. Cirrhosis was the only independent predictor of poor response.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

直接抗病毒治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染的疗效。巴林的真实经历。
目的:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)的引入彻底改变了慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的治疗。本研究旨在确定基于sofosbuvir (sofb)和基于Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ ritonvir (OPR-B)方案的实际治疗效果。患者和方法:这项前瞻性、非随机观察性现实研究在巴林Salmaniya医疗中心进行,纳入了连续接受直接抗病毒药物治疗的慢性HCV感染(基因型1-4)患者。在治疗结束后第12周评估对治疗的持续病毒学反应(SVR12)。结果:在纳入的167例患者中,60.5% (n=101)接受了sofb治疗,39.5% (n=66)接受了OPR-B治疗,疗程为12周(n=148;88.6%)或24周(n=19;11.4%)。156例(93.4%)患者达到了SVR12, 4例患者尽管完成了治疗,但仍未能达到SVR, 7例患者因不依从性而停止治疗,并根据意向治疗基础纳入分析。so - b和OPR-B方案之间没有差异(95/101;94.1%)和(61/66;92.4%),差异有统计学意义(p=0.68)。然而,无肝硬化患者的SVR12率明显更高(103/104;99.0%),而肝硬化患者(53/63;84.1%;购买力平价= 0.01)。除Hb、INR和ALP外,所有其他实验室参数在治疗后均得到改善(结论:在现实生活中的慢性HCV感染患者队列中,sofb和OPR-B方案均获得较高的SVR12率,与其他现实世界研究报道的结果相似。肝硬化是不良反应的唯一独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric hepatology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of hepatic disease Investigation and treatment of hepatic disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of hepatic disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered. As of 1st April 2019, Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信