Using technology to scale-up training and supervision of community health workers in the psychosocial management of perinatal depression: a non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2019-05-16 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2019.7
Atif Rahman, Parveen Akhtar, Syed Usman Hamdani, Najia Atif, Huma Nazir, Iftikhar Uddin, Anum Nisar, Zille Huma, Joanna Maselko, Siham Sikander, Shamsa Zafar
{"title":"Using technology to scale-up training and supervision of community health workers in the psychosocial management of perinatal depression: a non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Atif Rahman,&nbsp;Parveen Akhtar,&nbsp;Syed Usman Hamdani,&nbsp;Najia Atif,&nbsp;Huma Nazir,&nbsp;Iftikhar Uddin,&nbsp;Anum Nisar,&nbsp;Zille Huma,&nbsp;Joanna Maselko,&nbsp;Siham Sikander,&nbsp;Shamsa Zafar","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2019.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention endorsed by the World Health Organization, tailored for non-specialist health workers in low- and middle-income countries. However, training and supervision of large numbers of health workers is a major challenge for the scale-up of THP. We developed a 'Technology-Assisted Cascaded Training and Supervision system' (TACTS) for THP consisting of a training application and cascaded supervision delivered from a distance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted in District Swat, a post-conflict area of North Pakistan. Eighty community health workers (called Lady Health Workers or LHWs) were randomly assigned to either TACTS or conventional face-to-face training and supervision by a specialist. Competence of LHWs in delivering THP post-training was assessed by independent observers rating a therapeutic session using a standardized measure, the 'Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors' (ENACT), immediately post-training and after 3 months. ENACT uses a Likert scale to score an observed interaction on 18 dimensions, with a total score of 54, and a higher score indicating greater competence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated no significant differences between health workers trained using TACTS and supervised from distance <i>v.</i> those trained and supervised by a specialist face-to-face (<i>mean ENACT score M</i>  =  24.97, s.d.  =  5.95 <i>v</i>. <i>M</i> =  27.27, s.d.  =  5.60, <i>p</i>  =  0.079, 95% CI 4.87-0.27) and at 3 months follow-up assessment (<i>M</i>  =  44.48, s.d.  =  3.97 <i>v</i>. <i>M</i> =  43.63, s.d.  =  6.34, <i>p</i>  =  0.53, CI -1.88 to 3.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TACTS can provide a promising tool for training and supervision of front-line workers in areas where there is a shortage of specialist trainers and supervisors.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/gmh.2019.7","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2019.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Background: The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention endorsed by the World Health Organization, tailored for non-specialist health workers in low- and middle-income countries. However, training and supervision of large numbers of health workers is a major challenge for the scale-up of THP. We developed a 'Technology-Assisted Cascaded Training and Supervision system' (TACTS) for THP consisting of a training application and cascaded supervision delivered from a distance.

Methods: A single-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted in District Swat, a post-conflict area of North Pakistan. Eighty community health workers (called Lady Health Workers or LHWs) were randomly assigned to either TACTS or conventional face-to-face training and supervision by a specialist. Competence of LHWs in delivering THP post-training was assessed by independent observers rating a therapeutic session using a standardized measure, the 'Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors' (ENACT), immediately post-training and after 3 months. ENACT uses a Likert scale to score an observed interaction on 18 dimensions, with a total score of 54, and a higher score indicating greater competence.

Results: Results indicated no significant differences between health workers trained using TACTS and supervised from distance v. those trained and supervised by a specialist face-to-face (mean ENACT score M  =  24.97, s.d.  =  5.95 v. M =  27.27, s.d.  =  5.60, p  =  0.079, 95% CI 4.87-0.27) and at 3 months follow-up assessment (M  =  44.48, s.d.  =  3.97 v. M =  43.63, s.d.  =  6.34, p  =  0.53, CI -1.88 to 3.59).

Conclusions: TACTS can provide a promising tool for training and supervision of front-line workers in areas where there is a shortage of specialist trainers and supervisors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用技术在围产期抑郁症的社会心理管理中扩大对社区卫生工作者的培训和监督:一项非劣效性随机对照试验
背景:健康思维计划(THP)是世界卫生组织认可的一项基于证据的心理干预措施,为中低收入国家的非专业卫生工作者量身定制。然而,对大量卫生工作者的培训和监督是扩大THP的主要挑战。我们为THP开发了一个“技术辅助级联培训和监督系统”(TACTS),该系统由远程培训应用和级联监督组成。方法:在巴基斯坦北部冲突后的斯瓦特地区进行了一项单盲、非劣效性、随机对照试验。80名社区卫生工作者(称为女性卫生工作者或LHWs)被随机分配到TACTS或传统的面对面培训和由专家监督。LHWs在培训后提供THP的能力由独立观察员在培训后立即和3个月后使用标准化措施“增强常见治疗因素评估”(ENACT)对治疗过程进行评分。ENACT使用李克特量表在18个维度上对观察到的互动进行评分,总分为54分,得分越高表明能力越强。结果:结果显示,接受TACTS培训并接受远程监督的卫生工作者与接受专家面对面监督的卫生工作者之间无显著差异(平均ENACT评分M = 24.97, s.d = 5.95 vs . M = 27.27, s.d = 5.60, p = 0.079, 95% CI 4.87-0.27),以及3个月随访评估时(M = 44.48, s.d = 3.97 vs . M = 43.63, s.d = 6.34, p = 0.53, CI -1.88 - 3.59)。结论:TACTS可为缺乏专业培训师和监督员的地区一线工作人员的培训和监督提供一种有前景的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信