Orthostatic blood pressure drop and cardiovascular and psychotropic medication dosages in acutely ill geriatric inpatients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-29 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2019.1623516
J Paul, F Vaillant, O Vanden Bossche, T Pepersack, S Henrard, B Boland
{"title":"Orthostatic blood pressure drop and cardiovascular and psychotropic medication dosages in acutely ill geriatric inpatients.","authors":"J Paul,&nbsp;F Vaillant,&nbsp;O Vanden Bossche,&nbsp;T Pepersack,&nbsp;S Henrard,&nbsp;B Boland","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2019.1623516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>. To investigate the dose-response relationship between cardiovascular or psychotropic medication dosages and falling orthostatic blood pressure in geriatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>. This cross-sectional study included 100 consecutive geriatric inpatients of a Belgian hospital. The end points were the maximum changes of systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure in a standing up position at one or three minutes. The dosages of six classes of vascular and five classes of psychotropic medications were expressed in terms of a proportion of defined daily doses (DDD). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>. The 100 geriatric patients (85 ± 5 years, 58 % women) received 7.7 ± 4 medications (mean DDD: vascular = 1.0, psychotropic = 0.74) on the day of an orthostatic test (lying sBP: 136 ± 21; dBP: 72 ± 14 mm Hg). In a standing position, sBP and dBP fell by 12 ± 17 and 11 ± 5 mmHg, respectively. At the individual level, BP change was not correlated with vascular DDD (sBP: p = 0.07, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.04; dBP: p = 0.59; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.004) nor with psychotropic DDD (sBP: p = 0.14, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.02; dBP: p = 0.82; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.0). In multivariate analysis, sBP drop was positively associated with age, diabetes, falls history, and number of medications, but not with the DDD of any of the medication classes, while dBP drop was positively associated with age, diabetes, stroke and anaemia, but again with the DDD of any of the medication classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>. No correlation was found between vascular and psychotropic medication dosages and the orthostatic blood pressure drop expressed as a continuous variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":"75 5","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17843286.2019.1623516","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1623516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: . To investigate the dose-response relationship between cardiovascular or psychotropic medication dosages and falling orthostatic blood pressure in geriatric inpatients.

Methods: . This cross-sectional study included 100 consecutive geriatric inpatients of a Belgian hospital. The end points were the maximum changes of systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure in a standing up position at one or three minutes. The dosages of six classes of vascular and five classes of psychotropic medications were expressed in terms of a proportion of defined daily doses (DDD). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used.

Results: . The 100 geriatric patients (85 ± 5 years, 58 % women) received 7.7 ± 4 medications (mean DDD: vascular = 1.0, psychotropic = 0.74) on the day of an orthostatic test (lying sBP: 136 ± 21; dBP: 72 ± 14 mm Hg). In a standing position, sBP and dBP fell by 12 ± 17 and 11 ± 5 mmHg, respectively. At the individual level, BP change was not correlated with vascular DDD (sBP: p = 0.07, r2 = 0.04; dBP: p = 0.59; r2 = 0.004) nor with psychotropic DDD (sBP: p = 0.14, r2 = 0.02; dBP: p = 0.82; r2 = 0.0). In multivariate analysis, sBP drop was positively associated with age, diabetes, falls history, and number of medications, but not with the DDD of any of the medication classes, while dBP drop was positively associated with age, diabetes, stroke and anaemia, but again with the DDD of any of the medication classes.

Conclusion: . No correlation was found between vascular and psychotropic medication dosages and the orthostatic blood pressure drop expressed as a continuous variable.

老年急性病住院患者体位血压下降与心血管和精神药物剂量的关系。
目的:。探讨老年住院患者心血管或精神药物剂量与体位血压下降的剂量-反应关系。方法:。本横断面研究包括100名连续在比利时一家医院住院的老年患者。终点是站立位1分钟或3分钟时收缩压(sBP)和舒张压(dBP)的最大变化。六类血管药物和五类精神药物的剂量以限定日剂量(DDD)的比例表示。采用双变量和多变量线性回归模型。结果:。100例老年患者(85±5岁,58%为女性)在直立试验当天接受了7.7±4种药物治疗(平均DDD:血管= 1.0,精神药物= 0.74)(卧位收缩压:136±21;dBP: 72±14mmhg)。站立时收缩压和舒张压分别下降12±17和11±5 mmHg。在个体水平上,血压变化与血管DDD无相关性(sBP: p = 0.07, r2 = 0.04;dBP: p = 0.59;r2 = 0.004)与精神类DDD无关(sBP: p = 0.14, r2 = 0.02;dBP: p = 0.82;r2 = 0.0)。在多变量分析中,收缩压下降与年龄、糖尿病、跌倒史和药物数量呈正相关,但与任何药物类别的DDD无关,而舒张压下降与年龄、糖尿病、中风和贫血呈正相关,但与任何药物类别的DDD呈正相关。结论:。血管和精神药物剂量与体位血压降之间没有相关性,体位血压降表现为连续变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信