Hanne Alves Bakke, Wiviane Abreu Cavalcante, Ilana Santos de Oliveira, Silvia Wanick Sarinho, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo
{"title":"Assessment of Motor Skills in Children With Visual Impairment: A Systematic and Integrative Review.","authors":"Hanne Alves Bakke, Wiviane Abreu Cavalcante, Ilana Santos de Oliveira, Silvia Wanick Sarinho, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo","doi":"10.1177/1179556519838287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to review and examine the tools used to assess psychomotor performance of children with visual impairment. Databases, such as SCOPUS, MEDLINE/PubMed, Medline/EBSCO, Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, were searched using Mesh terms. Data from manuscripts fully available in these databases between 1994 and 2017 (except CINAHL-2014) concerning the evaluation, tool development, or intervention for the improvement of motor skills in children (age, 7-10 years) with visual impairment were collected. The Critical Review Form-Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. As a result, 1113 articles were found, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria; 66.7% of the articles had moderate quality, with unsatisfactory results regarding the validity and reliability of the tools used to assess these children, as well as the absence of clinical importance and practical application in such studies. Only the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 and Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 described data on the validation and reliability in visually impaired children. To minimize systematic errors and improve the quality of the investigations, increasing the number of studies regarding the tools, functionality of their activities, and testing the adaptions is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":45027,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179556519838287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179556519838287","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556519838287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
This study aimed to review and examine the tools used to assess psychomotor performance of children with visual impairment. Databases, such as SCOPUS, MEDLINE/PubMed, Medline/EBSCO, Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, were searched using Mesh terms. Data from manuscripts fully available in these databases between 1994 and 2017 (except CINAHL-2014) concerning the evaluation, tool development, or intervention for the improvement of motor skills in children (age, 7-10 years) with visual impairment were collected. The Critical Review Form-Quantitative Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. As a result, 1113 articles were found, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria; 66.7% of the articles had moderate quality, with unsatisfactory results regarding the validity and reliability of the tools used to assess these children, as well as the absence of clinical importance and practical application in such studies. Only the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 and Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 described data on the validation and reliability in visually impaired children. To minimize systematic errors and improve the quality of the investigations, increasing the number of studies regarding the tools, functionality of their activities, and testing the adaptions is necessary.
本研究旨在回顾和检查用于评估视觉障碍儿童精神运动表现的工具。SCOPUS、MEDLINE/PubMed、MEDLINE/ EBSCO、Web of Science、LILACS、CINAHL和ScienceDirect等数据库使用Mesh术语进行检索。收集了1994年至2017年(CINAHL-2014除外)这些数据库中完全可用的手稿中有关视力障碍儿童(7-10岁)运动技能改善的评估、工具开发或干预措施的数据。使用批判性评论表-定量研究来评估文章的质量。结果发现1113篇文章,但只有24篇符合纳入标准;66.7%的文章质量中等,用于评估这些儿童的工具的效度和可靠性不令人满意,并且在此类研究中缺乏临床重要性和实际应用。只有大肌肉运动发展测试-2和儿童运动评估测试-2描述了视障儿童的有效性和可靠性数据。为了尽量减少系统错误并提高调查的质量,有必要增加关于工具、其活动的功能和测试适应性的研究数量。