Effects of timing of food intake and fat/carbohydrate ratio on insulin sensitivity and preconditioning against renal ischemia reperfusion injury by calorie restriction.

Q3 Medicine
Justin S Reynolds, Wei Peng, Timothy Chu, James R Mitchell
{"title":"Effects of timing of food intake and fat/carbohydrate ratio on insulin sensitivity and preconditioning against renal ischemia reperfusion injury by calorie restriction.","authors":"Justin S Reynolds,&nbsp;Wei Peng,&nbsp;Timothy Chu,&nbsp;James R Mitchell","doi":"10.3233/NHA-180044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary restriction (DR) improves lifespan, metabolic fitness and resilience in many organisms, but the role of dietary macronutrient composition and timing of food intake in specific benefits remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to compare the effects of two isocaloric DR regimes differing in the timing of food intake - every other day (EOD) fasting/feeding vs. daily calorie restriction (CR) - at two different fat/carbohydrate ratios on two well-established DR benefits, improved glucose homeostasis and protection from renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice. We hypothesized that both EOD fasting and isocaloric CR would result in similar improvements in glucose homeostasis and stress resistance independent of macronutrient composition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six groups of mice were fed either semi-purified low-fat diet (LFD, 10% calories from fat) or high-fat diet (HFD, 60% calories from fat) and randomized into one of three dietary regimens: 1) <i>ad libitum</i> (AL), 2) EOD feeding/fasting, or 3) pair-fed daily to the average daily EOD intake within LFD or HFD feeding group resulting in daily CR. After 6 weeks, the following assessments were made: fasting blood glucose, glucose and insulin tolerance, and resistance to bilateral renal ischemia reperfusion injury using serum urea as a marker of renal function. Within the EOD group, the effects of prior day feeding (EOD<sup>fed</sup> vs. EOD<sup>fast</sup>) were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EOD mice ate ∼20-25% less food over time than AL mice on the corresponding LFD or HFD. EOD and CR mice displayed changes in body weight, fasting blood glucose levels and glucose tolerance commensurate with total calorie intake. No significant differences were observed in circulating IGF-1 levels. Insulin sensitivity improved independent of fat/carbohydrate ratio on daily CR and EOD<sup>fast</sup> regimens, but not EOD<sup>fed</sup>. HFD increased susceptibility to renal ischemia reperfusion in AL mice, while CR and EOD regimens gave significant protection independent of dietary fat content or fed or fasted day in the EOD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced food intake protects mice against renal ischemia reperfusion injury within 6 weeks independent of timing of food intake (CR, EOD<sup>fast</sup>, EOD<sup>fed</sup>) or fat content of diet (10% vs. 60%). Neither circulating IGF-1 levels (unchanged) nor whole-body insulin sensitivity (improved upon daily CR and EOD<sup>fast</sup> but not EOD<sup>fed</sup>) correlated with protection, so are unlikely to be involved mechanistically.</p>","PeriodicalId":37419,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","volume":"5 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/NHA-180044","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NHA-180044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Dietary restriction (DR) improves lifespan, metabolic fitness and resilience in many organisms, but the role of dietary macronutrient composition and timing of food intake in specific benefits remains unclear.

Objective: We sought to compare the effects of two isocaloric DR regimes differing in the timing of food intake - every other day (EOD) fasting/feeding vs. daily calorie restriction (CR) - at two different fat/carbohydrate ratios on two well-established DR benefits, improved glucose homeostasis and protection from renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice. We hypothesized that both EOD fasting and isocaloric CR would result in similar improvements in glucose homeostasis and stress resistance independent of macronutrient composition.

Methods: Six groups of mice were fed either semi-purified low-fat diet (LFD, 10% calories from fat) or high-fat diet (HFD, 60% calories from fat) and randomized into one of three dietary regimens: 1) ad libitum (AL), 2) EOD feeding/fasting, or 3) pair-fed daily to the average daily EOD intake within LFD or HFD feeding group resulting in daily CR. After 6 weeks, the following assessments were made: fasting blood glucose, glucose and insulin tolerance, and resistance to bilateral renal ischemia reperfusion injury using serum urea as a marker of renal function. Within the EOD group, the effects of prior day feeding (EODfed vs. EODfast) were also assessed.

Results: EOD mice ate ∼20-25% less food over time than AL mice on the corresponding LFD or HFD. EOD and CR mice displayed changes in body weight, fasting blood glucose levels and glucose tolerance commensurate with total calorie intake. No significant differences were observed in circulating IGF-1 levels. Insulin sensitivity improved independent of fat/carbohydrate ratio on daily CR and EODfast regimens, but not EODfed. HFD increased susceptibility to renal ischemia reperfusion in AL mice, while CR and EOD regimens gave significant protection independent of dietary fat content or fed or fasted day in the EOD group.

Conclusions: Reduced food intake protects mice against renal ischemia reperfusion injury within 6 weeks independent of timing of food intake (CR, EODfast, EODfed) or fat content of diet (10% vs. 60%). Neither circulating IGF-1 levels (unchanged) nor whole-body insulin sensitivity (improved upon daily CR and EODfast but not EODfed) correlated with protection, so are unlikely to be involved mechanistically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

食物摄入时间和脂肪/碳水化合物比对胰岛素敏感性和热量限制对肾缺血再灌注损伤预适应的影响。
背景:饮食限制(DR)可以改善许多生物体的寿命、代谢健康和恢复能力,但饮食宏量营养素组成和食物摄入时间在具体益处中的作用尚不清楚。目的:我们试图比较在两种不同脂肪/碳水化合物比例下,两种不同食物摄入时间(每隔一天(EOD)禁食/喂养与每日卡路里限制(CR))的等热量DR方案对两种已确定的DR益处的影响,改善葡萄糖稳态并保护小鼠免受肾缺血再灌注损伤。我们假设EOD禁食和等热量CR都会导致类似的葡萄糖稳态和抗逆性改善,而不依赖于宏量营养素组成。方法:6组小鼠分别饲喂半纯低脂饮食(LFD, 10%的热量来自脂肪)或高脂饮食(HFD, 60%的热量来自脂肪),随机分为3种饮食方案:1)随意进食(AL), 2) EOD摄食/禁食,3)LFD或HFD摄食组每日平均每日EOD摄取量(每日CR)配对喂养。6周后,进行以下评估:空腹血糖,葡萄糖和胰岛素耐量,以及对双侧肾缺血再灌注损伤的抵抗,用血清尿素作为肾功能的标志。在EOD组中,还评估了前一天喂养(EODfed vs. EODfast)的效果。结果:随着时间的推移,EOD小鼠比相应LFD或HFD的AL小鼠吃的食物少~ 20-25%。EOD和CR小鼠的体重、空腹血糖水平和葡萄糖耐量与总卡路里摄入量相当。循环IGF-1水平无显著差异。在每日CR和EODfast方案中,胰岛素敏感性的改善与脂肪/碳水化合物比例无关,但EODfed方案没有。HFD增加了AL小鼠对肾脏缺血再灌注的易感性,而CR和EOD方案在EOD组中具有显著的保护作用,与膳食脂肪含量或饲喂或禁食天数无关。结论:在6周内,减少食物摄入对小鼠肾脏缺血再灌注损伤具有保护作用,与食物摄入时间(CR、EODfast、EODfed)或饮食脂肪含量(10% vs 60%)无关。循环IGF-1水平(不变)和全身胰岛素敏感性(每日CR和EODfast改善,但EODfed不改善)都与保护无关,因此不太可能涉及机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and Healthy Aging
Nutrition and Healthy Aging Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Nutrition and Healthy Aging is an international forum for research on nutrition as a means of promoting healthy aging. It is particularly concerned with the impact of nutritional interventions on the metabolic and molecular mechanisms which modulate aging and age-associated diseases, including both biological responses on the part of the organism itself and its micro biome. Results emanating from both model organisms and clinical trials will be considered. With regards to the latter, the journal will be rigorous in only accepting for publication well controlled, randomized human intervention trials that conform broadly with the current EFSA and US FDA guidelines for nutritional clinical studies. The journal will publish research articles, short communications, critical reviews and conference summaries, whilst open peer commentaries will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信