The Ethics in Synthetics: Statistics in the Service of Ethics and Law in Health-Related Research in Big Data from Multiple Sources.

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Sharon Bassan, Ofer Harel
{"title":"The Ethics in Synthetics: Statistics in the Service of Ethics and Law in Health-Related Research in Big Data from Multiple Sources.","authors":"Sharon Bassan,&nbsp;Ofer Harel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ethical advancement of scientific knowledge demands a delicate equilibrium between benefits and harms, in particular in health-related research. When applying and advancing scientific knowledge or technologies, Article 4 of UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, ethically justifiable research requires maximizing direct and indirect benefits and minimizing possible harms. The National Institution of Health [NIH] Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance similarly states that data necessary for drawing valid conclusions and advancing medical research should be made as widely and freely available as possible (in order to share the benefits) while safeguarding the privacy of participants from potentially harmful disclosure of sensitive information. This paper discusses the challenges in the maximization of research benefit and the minimization of potential harms in the unique context of health-related research in Big Data from multiple sources, which are differently protected by the law. Part I frames the ethical dilemma by discussing potential benefits and harms, showing the constant misalignment in health-related research in Big Data from multiple sources, between the benefits in the use of confidential information for scientific purposes and the value in keeping confidentiality. Part II addresses existing regulations, including their nature and legal coverage. It highlights the prevailing challenges when combining data from multiple sources that are differently protected by the law. Part III compares different requirements for consent or authorization to use persons' health information for research. It focuses on the difficulty of existing regulation to ensure those requirements when using multiple sources of data. Part IV investigates whether exemptions from the authorization requirement could prevail in the context of information that exceeds the protection of HIPAA and the Protection of Human Subjects Regulations. In Part V the paper proposes a solution of a statistical nature, using the method of synthetic data to balance conflicting considerations. Part VI shows how the use of synthetic data can overcome some of the ethical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ethical advancement of scientific knowledge demands a delicate equilibrium between benefits and harms, in particular in health-related research. When applying and advancing scientific knowledge or technologies, Article 4 of UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, ethically justifiable research requires maximizing direct and indirect benefits and minimizing possible harms. The National Institution of Health [NIH] Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance similarly states that data necessary for drawing valid conclusions and advancing medical research should be made as widely and freely available as possible (in order to share the benefits) while safeguarding the privacy of participants from potentially harmful disclosure of sensitive information. This paper discusses the challenges in the maximization of research benefit and the minimization of potential harms in the unique context of health-related research in Big Data from multiple sources, which are differently protected by the law. Part I frames the ethical dilemma by discussing potential benefits and harms, showing the constant misalignment in health-related research in Big Data from multiple sources, between the benefits in the use of confidential information for scientific purposes and the value in keeping confidentiality. Part II addresses existing regulations, including their nature and legal coverage. It highlights the prevailing challenges when combining data from multiple sources that are differently protected by the law. Part III compares different requirements for consent or authorization to use persons' health information for research. It focuses on the difficulty of existing regulation to ensure those requirements when using multiple sources of data. Part IV investigates whether exemptions from the authorization requirement could prevail in the context of information that exceeds the protection of HIPAA and the Protection of Human Subjects Regulations. In Part V the paper proposes a solution of a statistical nature, using the method of synthetic data to balance conflicting considerations. Part VI shows how the use of synthetic data can overcome some of the ethical challenges.

综合伦理:多来源大数据健康相关研究中的伦理与法律服务统计。
科学知识的伦理进步要求在利益和危害之间取得微妙的平衡,特别是在与健康有关的研究中。教科文组织《世界生物伦理与人权宣言》第4条规定,在应用和推进科学知识或技术时,伦理上合理的研究要求最大限度地提高直接和间接效益,并尽量减少可能的危害。《美国国立卫生研究院数据共享政策和实施指南》同样指出,应尽可能广泛和免费地提供得出有效结论和推进医学研究所需的数据(以便分享利益),同时保护参与者的隐私,使其免受敏感信息泄露的潜在危害。本文讨论了在受不同法律保护的多来源健康相关大数据研究的独特背景下,研究利益最大化和潜在危害最小化所面临的挑战。第一部分通过讨论潜在的利益和危害来构建伦理困境,展示了在来自多个来源的与健康相关的大数据研究中,为科学目的使用机密信息的好处与保密的价值之间不断出现的错位。第二部分讨论现有的法规,包括它们的性质和法律范围。它强调了在合并受到不同法律保护的多个来源的数据时所面临的普遍挑战。第三部分比较了同意或授权将个人健康信息用于研究的不同要求。它侧重于现有法规在使用多个数据源时确保这些要求的困难。第四部分调查在信息超出HIPAA和人类受试者保护条例保护的情况下,授权要求的豁免是否可以占上风。在第五部分,本文提出了一个统计性质的解决方案,使用综合数据的方法来平衡冲突的考虑。第六部分展示了如何使用合成数据来克服一些伦理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信