Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients not Meeting Sepsis Criteria: Clinical Features, Host Immune Response and Outcomes.

Journal of clinical medicine and therapeutics Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-20
Daniel E Salas, Emi Minejima, Joanna Wu, Chong Fang, Joshua Wang, Rosemary She, Paul Nieberg, Annie Wong-Beringer
{"title":"Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients not Meeting Sepsis Criteria: Clinical Features, Host Immune Response and Outcomes.","authors":"Daniel E Salas, Emi Minejima, Joanna Wu, Chong Fang, Joshua Wang, Rosemary She, Paul Nieberg, Annie Wong-Beringer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limitations regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) criteria prompted the recent revision in consensus definitions of sepsis and septic shock. We evaluated patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia (SAB) who did not meet SIRS criteria for sepsis (SIRS-negative, SIRS-N) to compare host immune response and outcomes with SIRS-positive (P) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study of patients hospitalized for SAB during 2012-2015 was conducted. Pro- (TNFα, IL6, IL8) and anti-inflammatory (IL10) cytokine levels (pg/mL) were compared between SIRS-N and SIRS-P patients. Outcome endpoints were day 4 persistence and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 353 study patients, 23% were SIRS-N. A similar proportion of SIRS-N and SIRS-P patients had an infection-related admitting diagnosis (70% <i>vs</i>. 66%, p=0.5946), and both groups received timely antibiotic administration. Less than 1/3 of SIRS-N group had abnormal WBC count, tachycardia, or tachypnea while <15% had fever/hypothermia or hypotension. Initial proand anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly lower and in balance as indicated by IL10/TNF ratio in SIRS-N compared to SIRS-P patients. IL10/TNF ratio increased progressively in patients with increasing sepsis severity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical management of patients with SAB seemed driven largely by clinician assessment rather than SIRS criteria alone, with one in 4 patients not meeting SIRS criteria. Importantly, the severity of presentation and outcomes of SAB correspond well to the magnitude of underlying imbalance in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels, supporting the updated sepsis definition as \"life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection\".</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>In a prospective observational study of 353 patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia, 23% did not meet SIRS criteria for sepsis. Severity of sepsis and risk of death is supported by a dysregulated host cytokine response with progressively increasing IL10/TNF ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":92664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine and therapeutics","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limitations regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) criteria prompted the recent revision in consensus definitions of sepsis and septic shock. We evaluated patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) who did not meet SIRS criteria for sepsis (SIRS-negative, SIRS-N) to compare host immune response and outcomes with SIRS-positive (P) patients.

Methods: A prospective observational study of patients hospitalized for SAB during 2012-2015 was conducted. Pro- (TNFα, IL6, IL8) and anti-inflammatory (IL10) cytokine levels (pg/mL) were compared between SIRS-N and SIRS-P patients. Outcome endpoints were day 4 persistence and 30-day mortality.

Results: Of the 353 study patients, 23% were SIRS-N. A similar proportion of SIRS-N and SIRS-P patients had an infection-related admitting diagnosis (70% vs. 66%, p=0.5946), and both groups received timely antibiotic administration. Less than 1/3 of SIRS-N group had abnormal WBC count, tachycardia, or tachypnea while <15% had fever/hypothermia or hypotension. Initial proand anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly lower and in balance as indicated by IL10/TNF ratio in SIRS-N compared to SIRS-P patients. IL10/TNF ratio increased progressively in patients with increasing sepsis severity and mortality.

Conclusions: Clinical management of patients with SAB seemed driven largely by clinician assessment rather than SIRS criteria alone, with one in 4 patients not meeting SIRS criteria. Importantly, the severity of presentation and outcomes of SAB correspond well to the magnitude of underlying imbalance in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels, supporting the updated sepsis definition as "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection".

Key points: In a prospective observational study of 353 patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, 23% did not meet SIRS criteria for sepsis. Severity of sepsis and risk of death is supported by a dysregulated host cytokine response with progressively increasing IL10/TNF ratio.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不符合败血症标准的金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者:临床特征、宿主免疫反应和结果。
背景:由于全身炎症反应(SIRS)标准的敏感性和特异性存在局限性,最近对脓毒症和脓毒性休克的共识定义进行了修订。我们对不符合脓毒症 SIRS 标准(SIRS 阴性,SIRS-N)的金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)患者进行了评估,以比较宿主免疫反应和 SIRS 阳性(P)患者的预后:方法: 对 2012-2015 年期间因 SAB 住院的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。比较了 SIRS-N 和 SIRS-P 患者的促(TNFα、IL6、IL8)和抗(IL10)细胞因子水平(pg/mL)。结果终点为第 4 天持续率和 30 天死亡率:在353名研究患者中,23%为SIRS-N。SIRS-N和SIRS-P患者的入院诊断与感染相关的比例相似(70%对66%,P=0.5946),两组患者都得到了及时的抗生素治疗。不到三分之一的 SIRS-N 组患者在入院时白细胞计数异常、心动过速或呼吸急促:对 SAB 患者的临床管理似乎主要取决于临床医生的评估,而不仅仅是 SIRS 标准,每 4 名患者中就有 1 人不符合 SIRS 标准。重要的是,SAB 的严重程度和结果与促炎细胞因子和抗炎细胞因子水平失衡的程度非常吻合,这支持了脓毒症的最新定义,即 "由于宿主对感染的反应失调而导致的危及生命的器官功能障碍":一项针对 353 名金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的前瞻性观察研究显示,23% 的患者不符合脓毒症的 SIRS 标准。脓毒症的严重程度和死亡风险受到宿主细胞因子反应失调的支持,IL10/TNF 比率逐渐升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信