The power of sample size through a multi-scanner approach in MR neuroimaging regression analysis: evidence from Alzheimer's disease with and without depression.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Efstratios Karavasilis, Theodore P Parthimos, John D Papatriantafyllou, Foteini Christidi, Sokratis G Papageorgiou, George Kapsas, Andrew C Papanicolaou, Ioannis Seimenis
{"title":"The power of sample size through a multi-scanner approach in MR neuroimaging regression analysis: evidence from Alzheimer's disease with and without depression.","authors":"Efstratios Karavasilis,&nbsp;Theodore P Parthimos,&nbsp;John D Papatriantafyllou,&nbsp;Foteini Christidi,&nbsp;Sokratis G Papageorgiou,&nbsp;George Kapsas,&nbsp;Andrew C Papanicolaou,&nbsp;Ioannis Seimenis","doi":"10.1007/s13246-019-00758-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inconsistency of volumetric results often seen in MR neuroimaging studies can be partially attributed to small sample sizes and variable data analysis approaches. Increased sample size through multi-scanner studies can tackle the former, but combining data across different scanner platforms and field-strengths may introduce a variability factor capable of masking subtle statistical differences. To investigate the sample size effect on regression analysis between depressive symptoms and grey matter volume (GMV) loss in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a retrospective multi-scanner investigation was conducted. A cohort of 172 AD patients, with or without comorbid depressive symptoms, was studied. Patients were scanned with different imaging protocols in four different MRI scanners operating at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Acquired data were uniformly analyzed using the computational anatomy toolbox (CAT12) of the statistical parametric mapping (SPM12) software. Single- and multi-scanner regression analyses were applied to identify the anatomical pattern of correlation between GM loss and depression severity. A common anatomical pattern of correlation between GMV loss and increased depression severity, mostly involving sensorimotor areas, was identified in all patient subgroups imaged in different scanners. Analysis of the pooled multi-scanner data confirmed the above finding employing a more conservative statistical criterion. In the retrospective multi-scanner setting, a significant correlation was also exhibited for temporal and frontal areas. Increasing the sample size by retrospectively pooling multi-scanner data, irrespective of the acquisition platform and parameters employed, can facilitate the identification of anatomical areas with a strong correlation between GMV changes and depression symptoms in AD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55430,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":"42 2","pages":"563-571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00758-1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00758-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The inconsistency of volumetric results often seen in MR neuroimaging studies can be partially attributed to small sample sizes and variable data analysis approaches. Increased sample size through multi-scanner studies can tackle the former, but combining data across different scanner platforms and field-strengths may introduce a variability factor capable of masking subtle statistical differences. To investigate the sample size effect on regression analysis between depressive symptoms and grey matter volume (GMV) loss in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a retrospective multi-scanner investigation was conducted. A cohort of 172 AD patients, with or without comorbid depressive symptoms, was studied. Patients were scanned with different imaging protocols in four different MRI scanners operating at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Acquired data were uniformly analyzed using the computational anatomy toolbox (CAT12) of the statistical parametric mapping (SPM12) software. Single- and multi-scanner regression analyses were applied to identify the anatomical pattern of correlation between GM loss and depression severity. A common anatomical pattern of correlation between GMV loss and increased depression severity, mostly involving sensorimotor areas, was identified in all patient subgroups imaged in different scanners. Analysis of the pooled multi-scanner data confirmed the above finding employing a more conservative statistical criterion. In the retrospective multi-scanner setting, a significant correlation was also exhibited for temporal and frontal areas. Increasing the sample size by retrospectively pooling multi-scanner data, irrespective of the acquisition platform and parameters employed, can facilitate the identification of anatomical areas with a strong correlation between GMV changes and depression symptoms in AD patients.

磁共振神经成像回归分析中通过多扫描仪方法的样本量的力量:伴有和不伴有抑郁症的阿尔茨海默病的证据
在MR神经成像研究中经常看到的体积结果的不一致部分归因于小样本量和可变数据分析方法。通过多扫描仪研究增加样本量可以解决前者,但结合不同扫描仪平台和场强度的数据可能会引入可变性因素,从而掩盖细微的统计差异。为了研究阿尔茨海默病(AD)抑郁症状与灰质体积(GMV)损失之间回归分析的样本量效应,进行了回顾性多台扫描仪调查。研究了172例AD患者,有或无共病抑郁症状。在四种不同的MRI扫描仪上使用不同的成像方案扫描患者,操作温度分别为1.5 T或3.0 T,使用统计参数映射(SPM12)软件的计算解剖学工具箱(CAT12)对获取的数据进行统一分析。应用单扫描仪和多扫描仪回归分析来确定GM丢失与抑郁症严重程度之间的相关解剖模式。在不同扫描仪成像的所有患者亚组中,发现了GMV丧失与抑郁严重程度增加之间的共同解剖模式,主要涉及感觉运动区。对合并的多台扫描仪数据进行分析,采用更保守的统计标准证实了上述发现。在回顾性多台扫描仪设置中,颞叶和额叶区域也显示出显著的相关性。无论采用何种采集平台和参数,通过回顾性汇集多台扫描仪数据来增加样本量,有助于识别AD患者GMV变化与抑郁症状之间相关性强的解剖区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (APESM) is a multidisciplinary forum for information and research on the application of physics and engineering to medicine and human physiology. APESM covers a broad range of topics that include but is not limited to: - Medical physics in radiotherapy - Medical physics in diagnostic radiology - Medical physics in nuclear medicine - Mathematical modelling applied to medicine and human biology - Clinical biomedical engineering - Feature extraction, classification of EEG, ECG, EMG, EOG, and other biomedical signals; - Medical imaging - contributions to new and improved methods; - Modelling of physiological systems - Image processing to extract information from images, e.g. fMRI, CT, etc.; - Biomechanics, especially with applications to orthopaedics. - Nanotechnology in medicine APESM offers original reviews, scientific papers, scientific notes, technical papers, educational notes, book reviews and letters to the editor. APESM is the journal of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, and also the official journal of the College of Biomedical Engineers, Engineers Australia and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信