Endoscopic Management of Ureteric Stones: Our Initial Experience.

Taiwo Opeyemi Alabi, Emmanuel Ajibola Jeje, Moses Adebisi Ogunjimi, Rufus Wale Ojewola
{"title":"Endoscopic Management of Ureteric Stones: Our Initial Experience.","authors":"Taiwo Opeyemi Alabi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Ajibola Jeje,&nbsp;Moses Adebisi Ogunjimi,&nbsp;Rufus Wale Ojewola","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_20_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to present our initial experience with intracorporeal pneumatic ureterolithotripsy highlighting the pattern of patients' clinical presentation, techniques, and limitation of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of cases of ureteric stones managed over a period of 18 months in a private hospital. Data obtained include patients' sociodemography, clinical presentation, stone burden, procedural technique, complication, and need for a secondary procedure. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of patients managed was 20 with an age range of 28-75 years and a mean of 48.2 ± 12.4 years. Majority of them, i.e., 11 (55%) were middle aged. Female gender was more predominant, 11 (55%). Flank pain was the most common mode of presentation. Right-sided stone occurred in 9 (45%), left sided in 7 (35%), and bilateral in 4 (20%). Stone location was in the upper ureter in 4 (16.7%), mid-ureter in 7 (29.2%), and lower ureter in 13 (54.2%). The stone size ranged from 6 to 18 mm with a mean of 9.7 ± 2.5 mm. Four patients (20%) required initial bilateral ureteric stenting before definitive procedure to allow for recovery from sepsis and/or nephropathy. All patients had double-J stenting and were discharged 2 days after the procedure. The procedure was successful in 19 (95%) with 100% stone clearance rate and complete resolution of symptom without any complication. One patient (5%) had a very hard upper ureteric stone which retropulsed into the renal pelvis requiring open nephrolithotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic treatment of ureteric stone with intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality. It is, however, limited in the management of hard upper ureteric stone, especially those that are close to the pelviureteric junction due to the risk of retropulsion of the stone into the kidney.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"26-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/d0/NJS-25-26.PMC6452758.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_20_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to present our initial experience with intracorporeal pneumatic ureterolithotripsy highlighting the pattern of patients' clinical presentation, techniques, and limitation of the procedure.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of cases of ureteric stones managed over a period of 18 months in a private hospital. Data obtained include patients' sociodemography, clinical presentation, stone burden, procedural technique, complication, and need for a secondary procedure. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.

Results: The total number of patients managed was 20 with an age range of 28-75 years and a mean of 48.2 ± 12.4 years. Majority of them, i.e., 11 (55%) were middle aged. Female gender was more predominant, 11 (55%). Flank pain was the most common mode of presentation. Right-sided stone occurred in 9 (45%), left sided in 7 (35%), and bilateral in 4 (20%). Stone location was in the upper ureter in 4 (16.7%), mid-ureter in 7 (29.2%), and lower ureter in 13 (54.2%). The stone size ranged from 6 to 18 mm with a mean of 9.7 ± 2.5 mm. Four patients (20%) required initial bilateral ureteric stenting before definitive procedure to allow for recovery from sepsis and/or nephropathy. All patients had double-J stenting and were discharged 2 days after the procedure. The procedure was successful in 19 (95%) with 100% stone clearance rate and complete resolution of symptom without any complication. One patient (5%) had a very hard upper ureteric stone which retropulsed into the renal pelvis requiring open nephrolithotomy.

Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment of ureteric stone with intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality. It is, however, limited in the management of hard upper ureteric stone, especially those that are close to the pelviureteric junction due to the risk of retropulsion of the stone into the kidney.

Abstract Image

输尿管结石的内镜治疗:我们的初步经验。
目的:本研究的目的是介绍我们对输尿管腔内气压碎石术的初步经验,强调患者的临床表现、技术和手术的局限性。材料和方法:这是一个回顾性研究的情况下输尿管结石的管理超过18个月的私人医院。获得的数据包括患者的社会人口学、临床表现、结石负担、手术技术、并发症和是否需要二次手术。数据分析使用统计软件包的社会科学版本21。结果:共收治患者20例,年龄28 ~ 75岁,平均48.2±12.4岁。其中以中年人居多,即11人(55%)。女性占多数,11例(55%)。腹部疼痛是最常见的表现方式。右侧结石9例(45%),左侧结石7例(35%),双侧结石4例(20%)。结石位于输尿管上4例(16.7%),输尿管中7例(29.2%),输尿管下13例(54.2%)。结石大小为6 ~ 18mm,平均9.7±2.5 mm。4例患者(20%)在最终手术前需要初始双侧输尿管支架植入术,以便从败血症和/或肾病中恢复。所有患者均行双j型支架置入,术后2天出院。手术成功19例(95%),结石清除率100%,症状完全缓解,无任何并发症。1例(5%)患者输尿管上段有一颗非常坚硬的结石退回到肾盂,需要开腹取石术。结论:腔镜下腔内气压碎石治疗输尿管结石是一种安全有效的治疗方式。然而,对于输尿管上段的硬结石,特别是那些靠近肾盂输尿管连接处的结石,由于结石有退入肾脏的风险,其治疗受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信