Determination of Visual Portfolio for Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Needs Nigeria Study: Consensus Generation through an e-Delphi Process.

Felix Makinde Alakaloko, Etienne St-Louis, Adesoji O Ademuyiwa, Dan Poenaru, Christopher Bode
{"title":"Determination of Visual Portfolio for Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Needs Nigeria Study: Consensus Generation through an e-Delphi Process.","authors":"Felix Makinde Alakaloko,&nbsp;Etienne St-Louis,&nbsp;Adesoji O Ademuyiwa,&nbsp;Dan Poenaru,&nbsp;Christopher Bode","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_30_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery as a public health priority has received little attention until recently. There is a significant unmeasured and unmet burden of surgical illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our aim was to generate a consensus among expert pediatric surgeons practicing in LMICs regarding the spectrum of pediatric surgical conditions that we should look out for in a community-based survey for Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Needs Nigeria study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Delphi methodology was utilized to identify sets of variables from among a panel of experts. Each variable was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The experts were provided with an anonymous summary of the results after the first round. A consensus was achieved after two rounds, defined by an improvement in the standard deviation (SD) of scores for a particular variable over that of the previous round. We invited 76 pediatric surgeons through e-mail across Africa but predominantly from Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one pediatric surgeons gave consent to participate through return of mail. Thirteen (62%) answered the first round statements and 8 (38%) the second round. In general, the strength of agreement to all statements of the questionnaire improved between the first and second rounds. Overall consensus, as expressed by the decrease in the mean SD from 0.84 in the first round to 0.68 in the second round, also improved over time. The strength of consensus improved for 23 (74%) of the statements. The strength of consensus decreased for the remaining 8 (26%) of statements. Out of the 31 consensus-generating statements, 16 (51%) scored high agreement, 13 (42%) scored low agreement, and 2 (15%) scored perfect disagreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have successfully identified the pediatric surgical conditions to be included in any community survey of pediatric surgical need in an LMIC setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/2f/NJS-25-30.PMC6452749.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_30_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Surgery as a public health priority has received little attention until recently. There is a significant unmeasured and unmet burden of surgical illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our aim was to generate a consensus among expert pediatric surgeons practicing in LMICs regarding the spectrum of pediatric surgical conditions that we should look out for in a community-based survey for Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Needs Nigeria study.

Materials and methods: The Delphi methodology was utilized to identify sets of variables from among a panel of experts. Each variable was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The experts were provided with an anonymous summary of the results after the first round. A consensus was achieved after two rounds, defined by an improvement in the standard deviation (SD) of scores for a particular variable over that of the previous round. We invited 76 pediatric surgeons through e-mail across Africa but predominantly from Nigeria.

Results: Twenty-one pediatric surgeons gave consent to participate through return of mail. Thirteen (62%) answered the first round statements and 8 (38%) the second round. In general, the strength of agreement to all statements of the questionnaire improved between the first and second rounds. Overall consensus, as expressed by the decrease in the mean SD from 0.84 in the first round to 0.68 in the second round, also improved over time. The strength of consensus improved for 23 (74%) of the statements. The strength of consensus decreased for the remaining 8 (26%) of statements. Out of the 31 consensus-generating statements, 16 (51%) scored high agreement, 13 (42%) scored low agreement, and 2 (15%) scored perfect disagreement.

Conclusion: We have successfully identified the pediatric surgical conditions to be included in any community survey of pediatric surgical need in an LMIC setting.

尼日利亚研究:通过e-Delphi过程产生共识。
背景:直到最近,外科作为一项公共卫生重点才受到重视。在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),存在着巨大的未测量和未满足的外科疾病负担。我们的目标是在低收入和中等收入国家的儿科外科专家中就儿科外科疾病的范围达成共识,我们应该在尼日利亚外科医生海外手术需求评估研究中进行基于社区的调查。材料和方法:采用德尔菲法从专家小组中确定变量集。每个变量都以5分的李克特量表打分。在第一轮投票后,专家们收到了一份匿名的结果摘要。在两轮之后达成了共识,这是由一个特定变量的分数的标准偏差(SD)比前一轮的改进来定义的。我们通过电子邮件邀请了76名来自非洲的儿科外科医生,但主要来自尼日利亚。结果:21名儿科外科医生通过邮件回复同意参与。13人(62%)回答了第一轮问题,8人(38%)回答了第二轮问题。总的来说,在第一轮和第二轮之间,对问卷所有陈述的同意程度有所提高。总体共识也随着时间的推移而改善,正如平均标准差从第一轮的0.84下降到第二轮的0.68所表示的那样。23个(74%)的声明的共识强度有所提高。其余8份(26%)声明的共识强度有所下降。在31个产生共识的陈述中,16个(51%)得分高,13个(42%)得分低,2个(15%)得分完全不同意。结论:我们已经成功地确定了儿科手术条件,并将其纳入LMIC环境中任何儿科手术需求的社区调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信