Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-19 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2019.1605467
Lieselot Cool, Celine Brewaeys, Stefaan Viaene, Jana Missiaen, Michelle Lycke, Tessa Lefebvre, Laura Tack, Veerle Foulon, Hans Pottel, Philip Debruyne, Dominique Vandijck, Koen Van Eygen
{"title":"Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?","authors":"Lieselot Cool,&nbsp;Celine Brewaeys,&nbsp;Stefaan Viaene,&nbsp;Jana Missiaen,&nbsp;Michelle Lycke,&nbsp;Tessa Lefebvre,&nbsp;Laura Tack,&nbsp;Veerle Foulon,&nbsp;Hans Pottel,&nbsp;Philip Debruyne,&nbsp;Dominique Vandijck,&nbsp;Koen Van Eygen","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2019.1605467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":"75 4","pages":"250-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17843286.2019.1605467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1605467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system.

Methods: A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care.

Results: Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process.

Conclusion: The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.

将肿瘤专科护理从医院转移到家庭:患者、专家和全科医生之间是否存在支持?
目标:肿瘤家庭住院(OHH)可能是一种以病人为中心的方法,以应对癌症对卫生保健设施和财政日益增加的负担。在付诸实施之前,应评估其可行性、成本和利益相关者的支持程度。本试验的目的是探讨患者,专家和全科医生(全科医生)对比利时卫生保健系统内实施OHH的机会的看法。方法:开展区域横断面调查研究,调查利益相关者对职业健康和当前癌症护理的看法,重点是初级保健和持续护理的整合。结果:在应答者中,163名患者中有37名(23%),62名全科医生中有45名(73%),15名专科医生中有10名(67%)对OHH的机会持积极态度。然而,11/15的专科医生(73%)和51/62的全科医生(82%)认为,为了确保对癌症患者的持续护理,初级保健目前可能(太少)参与。改善初级保健和医院之间的沟通,以及在癌症治疗过程中与初级保健的更多患者接触,可以看到改善持续护理的机会。结论:这项地方调查研究的结果表明,在比利时卫生保健范围内,不同利益相关者群体支持实施职业健康卫生。然而,在实施这种模式之前,应该解决一些阻碍跨壁连续护理的障碍。建议在保健专业人员和更多患者接触之间加强沟通,并需要调整法律和财政框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信