Evaluation of a new combined Western and line blot assay (EUROLINE-WB) for diagnosis and species identification of Echinococcus infection in humans.

GMS infectious diseases Pub Date : 2019-02-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.3205/id000041
Susanne Deininger, Nele Wellinghausen
{"title":"Evaluation of a new combined Western and line blot assay (EUROLINE-WB) for diagnosis and species identification of Echinococcus infection in humans.","authors":"Susanne Deininger,&nbsp;Nele Wellinghausen","doi":"10.3205/id000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serological detection of echinococcosis is crucial for diagnosis and management. We evaluated the new blot assay Euroline-WB (ELB, Euroimmun) which consists of a Western blot with <i>Echinococcus multilocularis (E.m.)</i> vesicle antigens and a line blot part with recombinant antigens from <i>E. granulosus</i> (<i>E.g.</i>, genus-specific EgAgB) and <i>E.m.</i> (species-specific Em18 and Em95), in comparison to a commercial Western Blot (EWB, LDBio) for detection and species differentiation of echinococcosis within routine laboratory diagnostics. Thirty-five serum samples from 35 patients classified according to a standardized classification were included in the analysis. Out of 24 cases of proven and probable infection with <i>E.m.</i> or <i>E.g.</i> 16 (66.7%) and 15 (62.5%) were correctly identified on species level by EWB and ELB, respectively. False <i>Echinococcus</i> species were assigned in two cases by EWB but none by ELB. Negative blot results in patients with proven infections were noticed in 8.3% (ELB) compared to 4.2% (EWB), but were limited to patients with antiparasitic therapy or post-surgery indicating a treatment-induced loss of antibody activity. Thus, identification of <i>Echinococcus</i> infection at least on the genus level was possible in 23/24 (95.8%) and 19/24 (79.2%) of patients by EWB and ELB (or 22/24 patients (91.7%) including borderline results of ELB), respectively. Recombinant Em18 and Em95 were highly specific for detection of <i>E.m.</i> infection but differed in sensitivity (Em18 56% and 80 %, and Em95 22% and 20% in proven and probable infections, respectively). Advantages of ELB are the standardized analysis of the banding pattern by EUROLineScan software and a faster turn-around-time.</p>","PeriodicalId":91688,"journal":{"name":"GMS infectious diseases","volume":"7 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/id000041","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/id000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Serological detection of echinococcosis is crucial for diagnosis and management. We evaluated the new blot assay Euroline-WB (ELB, Euroimmun) which consists of a Western blot with Echinococcus multilocularis (E.m.) vesicle antigens and a line blot part with recombinant antigens from E. granulosus (E.g., genus-specific EgAgB) and E.m. (species-specific Em18 and Em95), in comparison to a commercial Western Blot (EWB, LDBio) for detection and species differentiation of echinococcosis within routine laboratory diagnostics. Thirty-five serum samples from 35 patients classified according to a standardized classification were included in the analysis. Out of 24 cases of proven and probable infection with E.m. or E.g. 16 (66.7%) and 15 (62.5%) were correctly identified on species level by EWB and ELB, respectively. False Echinococcus species were assigned in two cases by EWB but none by ELB. Negative blot results in patients with proven infections were noticed in 8.3% (ELB) compared to 4.2% (EWB), but were limited to patients with antiparasitic therapy or post-surgery indicating a treatment-induced loss of antibody activity. Thus, identification of Echinococcus infection at least on the genus level was possible in 23/24 (95.8%) and 19/24 (79.2%) of patients by EWB and ELB (or 22/24 patients (91.7%) including borderline results of ELB), respectively. Recombinant Em18 and Em95 were highly specific for detection of E.m. infection but differed in sensitivity (Em18 56% and 80 %, and Em95 22% and 20% in proven and probable infections, respectively). Advantages of ELB are the standardized analysis of the banding pattern by EUROLineScan software and a faster turn-around-time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新的Western - line - wb联合检测方法对人棘球蚴感染的诊断和种类鉴定的评价。
包虫病的血清学检测对包虫病的诊断和治疗至关重要。我们评估了新的免疫印迹法Euroline-WB (ELB, euroimmune),它由多房棘球绦虫(E.m)囊泡抗原的Western印迹和来自粒棘球绦虫(例如,属特异性EgAgB)和E.m(种特异性Em18和Em95)的重组抗原的line印迹部分组成,与商业Western印迹法(EWB, LDBio)在常规实验室诊断中检测棘球绦虫病和物种分化进行比较。35例按标准化分类的患者35份血清样本纳入分析。在24例证实和可能感染E.m.或e.g.的病例中,EWB和ELB在物种水平上分别正确识别了16例(66.7%)和15例(62.5%)。EWB鉴定出两种假棘球蚴,ELB鉴定出一种假棘球蚴。在确诊感染的患者中,阴性印迹结果为8.3% (ELB),而阴性印迹结果为4.2% (EWB),但仅限于接受抗寄生虫治疗或手术后的患者,表明治疗引起的抗体活性丧失。因此,有23/24(95.8%)和19/24(79.2%)的患者通过EWB和ELB(或22/24(91.7%)包括ELB的临界结果)分别在属水平上鉴定棘球蚴感染。重组Em18和Em95对E.m.感染的检测具有高度特异性,但敏感性不同(Em18对已证实感染和可能感染的检测分别为56%和80%,Em95为22%和20%)。ELB的优点是EUROLineScan软件对条带模式进行标准化分析,并且周转时间更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信