Warning Signs of Impending Critical Transitions in Love Affairs.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Sergio Rinaldi, Fabio Della Rossa
{"title":"Warning Signs of Impending Critical Transitions in Love Affairs.","authors":"Sergio Rinaldi,&nbsp;Fabio Della Rossa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychoanalysts and therapists have noticed that the increase of the reconciliation time, i.e., the period of dissatisfaction that two lovers need to return to their positive equilibrium after a dispute, is often a warning sign of an impending consistent drop of quality of the relationship, possibly followed by a breakup (e.g., a divorce). Here this rule is investigated and shown to be the logical consequence of the attitude of individuals (here called secure) who increase their reaction when their partners get more involved. The analysis is carried out with a well-known and repeatedly validated mathematical model composed of two nonlinear differential equations and the rule follows from the discovery that the model has catastrophic bifurcations with respect to the psychophysical traits of the partners. Thus, for example, negative trends in the appeal of the partners or in the reactiveness to it slowly but inevitably push couples toward a tipping point, from which a critical transition can originate. Since the rule is here justified only for couples composed of secure individuals, finding out if it holds also for other couples remains an interesting open problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":"23 2","pages":"261-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychoanalysts and therapists have noticed that the increase of the reconciliation time, i.e., the period of dissatisfaction that two lovers need to return to their positive equilibrium after a dispute, is often a warning sign of an impending consistent drop of quality of the relationship, possibly followed by a breakup (e.g., a divorce). Here this rule is investigated and shown to be the logical consequence of the attitude of individuals (here called secure) who increase their reaction when their partners get more involved. The analysis is carried out with a well-known and repeatedly validated mathematical model composed of two nonlinear differential equations and the rule follows from the discovery that the model has catastrophic bifurcations with respect to the psychophysical traits of the partners. Thus, for example, negative trends in the appeal of the partners or in the reactiveness to it slowly but inevitably push couples toward a tipping point, from which a critical transition can originate. Since the rule is here justified only for couples composed of secure individuals, finding out if it holds also for other couples remains an interesting open problem.

爱情中即将发生关键转变的警告信号。
精神分析学家和治疗师已经注意到,和解时间的增加,即两个恋人在争吵后需要回到积极平衡的不满时期,通常是关系质量即将持续下降的警告信号,可能随之而来的是分手(例如,离婚)。在这里,这条规则被调查并被证明是个人(这里称为安全)态度的逻辑结果,当他们的伴侣更多地参与时,他们的反应会增加。该分析是用一个由两个非线性微分方程组成的著名且反复验证的数学模型进行的,该规律来自于该模型在伴侣的心理物理特征方面具有灾难性的分岔。因此,例如,伴侣的吸引力或对它的反应的负面趋势缓慢但不可避免地将夫妻推向一个临界点,从这个临界点可以产生一个关键的转变。由于该规则仅适用于由安全个体组成的夫妻,因此找出它是否也适用于其他夫妻仍然是一个有趣的开放问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信