Improving intraoperative handoffs for ambulatory anesthesia: challenges and solutions for the anesthesiologist.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2019-05-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S183188
Franklin Dexter, Brian Mark Osman, Richard H Epstein
{"title":"Improving intraoperative handoffs for ambulatory anesthesia: challenges and solutions for the anesthesiologist.","authors":"Franklin Dexter,&nbsp;Brian Mark Osman,&nbsp;Richard H Epstein","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S183188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Permanent transitions of care from one anesthesia provider to another are associated with adverse events and mortality. There are currently no available data on how to mitigate these poor patient outcomes other than to reduce the occurrence of such handoffs. We used data from an ambulatory surgery center to demonstrate the steps that can be taken to achieve this goal. First, perform statistical forecasting using many months of historical data to create optimal, as opposed to arbitrary shift durations. Second, consider assigning the anesthesia providers designated to work late, if necessary, to the ORs estimated to finish the earliest, rather than latest. We performed multiple analyses showing the quantitative advantage of this strategy for the ambulatory surgery center with multiple brief cases. Third, sequence the cases in the 1 or 2 ORs with the latest scheduled end times so that the briefest cases are finished last. If a supervising anesthesiologist needs to be relieved early for administrative duties (eg, head of the group to meet with administrators or surgeons), assign the anesthesiologist to an OR that finishes with several brief cases. The rationale for these recommendations is that such strategies provide multiple opportunities for a different anesthesia provider to assume responsibility for the patients between cases, thus avoiding a handoff altogether.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"12 ","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S183188","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S183188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Permanent transitions of care from one anesthesia provider to another are associated with adverse events and mortality. There are currently no available data on how to mitigate these poor patient outcomes other than to reduce the occurrence of such handoffs. We used data from an ambulatory surgery center to demonstrate the steps that can be taken to achieve this goal. First, perform statistical forecasting using many months of historical data to create optimal, as opposed to arbitrary shift durations. Second, consider assigning the anesthesia providers designated to work late, if necessary, to the ORs estimated to finish the earliest, rather than latest. We performed multiple analyses showing the quantitative advantage of this strategy for the ambulatory surgery center with multiple brief cases. Third, sequence the cases in the 1 or 2 ORs with the latest scheduled end times so that the briefest cases are finished last. If a supervising anesthesiologist needs to be relieved early for administrative duties (eg, head of the group to meet with administrators or surgeons), assign the anesthesiologist to an OR that finishes with several brief cases. The rationale for these recommendations is that such strategies provide multiple opportunities for a different anesthesia provider to assume responsibility for the patients between cases, thus avoiding a handoff altogether.

改善门诊麻醉的术中交接:麻醉师面临的挑战和解决方案。
从一名麻醉提供者到另一名麻醉提供者的永久性转移与不良事件和死亡率有关。除了减少这种交接的发生外,目前还没有关于如何减轻这些不良患者预后的可用数据。我们使用了一个流动手术中心的数据来演示可以采取的步骤来实现这一目标。首先,使用多个月的历史数据执行统计预测,以创建最优值,而不是任意移动持续时间。第二,如有必要,考虑将指定工作到很晚的麻醉提供者分配到预计最早而不是最晚完成的手术室。我们进行了多项分析,显示了该策略在门诊手术中心的数量优势。第三,将1或2个手术室中的案例按最近的计划结束时间排序,以便最后完成最简短的案例。如果督导麻醉师需要提前解除行政职责(例如,组长会见行政人员或外科医生),将麻醉师分配到完成几个简短病例的手术室。这些建议的基本原理是,这种策略为不同的麻醉提供者提供了多种机会,可以在不同的病例之间承担病人的责任,从而避免了完全的交接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信