Epigenetics and Inflammatory Markers: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence.

IF 2.6 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of Inflammation Pub Date : 2019-05-08 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/6273680
Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Eliana Portilla-Fernandez, Marija Glisic, Trudy Voortman, Mohsen Ghanbari, Wichor Bramer, Rajiv Chowdhury, Tamar Nijsten, Abbas Dehghan, Oscar H Franco, Jana Nano
{"title":"Epigenetics and Inflammatory Markers: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence.","authors":"Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Eliana Portilla-Fernandez, Marija Glisic, Trudy Voortman, Mohsen Ghanbari, Wichor Bramer, Rajiv Chowdhury, Tamar Nijsten, Abbas Dehghan, Oscar H Franco, Jana Nano","doi":"10.1155/2019/6273680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epigenetic mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the genetic regulation of pathways related to inflammation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review studies investigating the association between DNA methylation and histone modifications with circulatory inflammation markers in blood. Five bibliographic databases were screened until 21 November of 2017. We included studies conducted on humans that examined the association between epigenetic marks (DNA methylation and/or histone modifications) and a comprehensive list of inflammatory markers. Of the 3,759 identified references, 24 articles were included, involving, 17,399 individuals. There was suggestive evidence for global hypomethylation but better-quality studies in the future have to confirm this. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) (n=7) reported most of the identified differentially methylated genes to be hypomethylated in inflammatory processes. Candidate genes studies reported 18 differentially methylated genes related to several circulatory inflammation markers. There was no overlap in the methylated sites investigated in candidate gene studies and EWAS, except for TMEM49, which was found to be hypomethylated with higher inflammatory markers in both types of studies. The relation between histone modifications and inflammatory markers was assessed by one study only. This review supports an association between epigenetic marks and inflammation, suggesting hypomethylation of the genome. Important gaps in the quality of studies were reported such as inadequate sample size, lack of adjustment for relevant confounders, and failure to replicate the findings. While most of the studies have been focused on C-reactive protein, further efforts should investigate other inflammatory markers.","PeriodicalId":14004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inflammation","volume":"2019 ","pages":"6273680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/6273680","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6273680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Epigenetic mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the genetic regulation of pathways related to inflammation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review studies investigating the association between DNA methylation and histone modifications with circulatory inflammation markers in blood. Five bibliographic databases were screened until 21 November of 2017. We included studies conducted on humans that examined the association between epigenetic marks (DNA methylation and/or histone modifications) and a comprehensive list of inflammatory markers. Of the 3,759 identified references, 24 articles were included, involving, 17,399 individuals. There was suggestive evidence for global hypomethylation but better-quality studies in the future have to confirm this. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) (n=7) reported most of the identified differentially methylated genes to be hypomethylated in inflammatory processes. Candidate genes studies reported 18 differentially methylated genes related to several circulatory inflammation markers. There was no overlap in the methylated sites investigated in candidate gene studies and EWAS, except for TMEM49, which was found to be hypomethylated with higher inflammatory markers in both types of studies. The relation between histone modifications and inflammatory markers was assessed by one study only. This review supports an association between epigenetic marks and inflammation, suggesting hypomethylation of the genome. Important gaps in the quality of studies were reported such as inadequate sample size, lack of adjustment for relevant confounders, and failure to replicate the findings. While most of the studies have been focused on C-reactive protein, further efforts should investigate other inflammatory markers.

Abstract Image

表观遗传学和炎症标志物:当前证据的系统回顾。
表观遗传机制已被认为在炎症相关途径的遗传调控中发挥作用。因此,我们旨在系统地回顾研究DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰与血液循环炎症标志物之间的关系。5个书目数据库筛选至2017年11月21日。我们纳入了对人类进行的研究,这些研究检查了表观遗传标记(DNA甲基化和/或组蛋白修饰)与炎症标记物的综合列表之间的关联。在确定的3759篇参考文献中,包括24篇文章,涉及17,399个人。已经有了关于整体低甲基化的暗示性证据,但未来需要更高质量的研究来证实这一点。全表观基因组关联研究(EWAS) (n=7)报道,大多数鉴定出的差异甲基化基因在炎症过程中都是低甲基化的。候选基因研究报告了18个与几种循环炎症标志物相关的差异甲基化基因。候选基因研究和EWAS中所研究的甲基化位点没有重叠,除了TMEM49,在两种类型的研究中,TMEM49被发现是低甲基化的,炎症标志物较高。组蛋白修饰与炎症标志物之间的关系仅通过一项研究进行了评估。这篇综述支持表观遗传标记和炎症之间的关联,表明基因组的低甲基化。报告了研究质量的重要差距,如样本量不足,缺乏对相关混杂因素的调整,以及未能重复研究结果。虽然大多数研究都集中在c反应蛋白上,但应该进一步研究其他炎症标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信