Red light violation and pedestrians' modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study.

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2019-07-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-15 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184
Mahdi Moshki, Abdoljavad Khajavi, Leila Doshmangir, Saeid Pour Doulati
{"title":"Red light violation and pedestrians' modal salient beliefs about unsafe road crossing behavior: a qualitative study.","authors":"Mahdi Moshki,&nbsp;Abdoljavad Khajavi,&nbsp;Leila Doshmangir,&nbsp;Saeid Pour Doulati","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pedestrians are amongst the most vulnerable road users and their unsafe behaviors have a major impact on traffic injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying psychological factors behind red light violation in pedestrians' crossing behavior based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and to provide recommendations for preventive interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted in Tabriz, one of the metropolitan cities of Iran. 30 pedestrians were individually interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended questions to elicit salient consequences, social referents, and circumstances regarding pedestrians' red light crossing behavior. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis followed by frequency analysis in order to detect modal salient beliefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total number of 115 sub-categories were identified which were then classified in the ten predetermined categories of the Theory of Planned Behavior: advantages, disadvantages, positive feelings, negative feelings, approving referents, disapproving referents, behaving referents, not-behaving referents, facilitators, and barriers. \"Saving time\" was elicited as the most important both the advantage and the positive feeling. \"Getting injured\" was identified as the most serious disadvantage. \"Lowering the level of culture\" was obtained as the main negative feeling. \"Friends/Peers\" comprise the most prominent group among both the approving and the behaving referents, whereas \"Family members\" constituted the most significant group both among the disapproving and the not-behaving referents. \"Being in a hurry\" was introduced as the most substantial facilitator and \"The fear of accident\" was identified as the most influential deterrent factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the major findings, reducing pedestrians' red light violations needs to focus: on the perceived negative and positive consequences and feelings of this behavior like getting injured, and saving time respectively; on the approval role of friends/peers, and the disapproval role of family; and on the fear of accident as a barrier, and rushing as a facilitating factor. More precise quantitative research is needed to determine the predictive power of these factors in such risky behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"11 2","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6646824/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Pedestrians are amongst the most vulnerable road users and their unsafe behaviors have a major impact on traffic injuries. The aim of this study was to determine the underlying psychological factors behind red light violation in pedestrians' crossing behavior based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and to provide recommendations for preventive interventions.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in Tabriz, one of the metropolitan cities of Iran. 30 pedestrians were individually interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended questions to elicit salient consequences, social referents, and circumstances regarding pedestrians' red light crossing behavior. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis followed by frequency analysis in order to detect modal salient beliefs.

Results: A total number of 115 sub-categories were identified which were then classified in the ten predetermined categories of the Theory of Planned Behavior: advantages, disadvantages, positive feelings, negative feelings, approving referents, disapproving referents, behaving referents, not-behaving referents, facilitators, and barriers. "Saving time" was elicited as the most important both the advantage and the positive feeling. "Getting injured" was identified as the most serious disadvantage. "Lowering the level of culture" was obtained as the main negative feeling. "Friends/Peers" comprise the most prominent group among both the approving and the behaving referents, whereas "Family members" constituted the most significant group both among the disapproving and the not-behaving referents. "Being in a hurry" was introduced as the most substantial facilitator and "The fear of accident" was identified as the most influential deterrent factor.

Conclusions: Based on the major findings, reducing pedestrians' red light violations needs to focus: on the perceived negative and positive consequences and feelings of this behavior like getting injured, and saving time respectively; on the approval role of friends/peers, and the disapproval role of family; and on the fear of accident as a barrier, and rushing as a facilitating factor. More precise quantitative research is needed to determine the predictive power of these factors in such risky behavior.

红灯违规与行人过马路不安全行为模态显著信念的定性研究
背景:行人是最脆弱的道路使用者之一,他们的不安全行为对交通伤害有重大影响。本研究旨在基于计划行为理论(TPB)探讨行人过马路红灯行为背后的潜在心理因素,并为预防干预提供建议。方法:本定性研究在伊朗大城市大不里士进行,采用半结构化开放式问题对30名行人进行了单独访谈,以得出行人闯红灯行为的显著后果、社会参考和环境。使用直接内容分析和频率分析来分析转录的访谈,以检测模态显著信念。结果:共确定了115个子类别,并将其划分为计划行为理论的10个预先确定的类别:优势、劣势、积极感受、消极感受、赞成参照物、不赞成参照物、行为参照物、不行为参照物、促进因素和障碍。“节省时间”被认为是最重要的优势和积极的感觉。“受伤”被认为是最严重的缺点。“降低文化水平”是主要的负面感受。“朋友/同伴”是赞成和不赞成行为的参照物中最显著的群体,“家庭成员”是不赞成和不赞成行为的参照物中最显著的群体。“匆忙”被认为是最重要的促成因素,“害怕事故”被认为是最具影响力的威慑因素。结论:基于主要研究结果,减少行人闯红灯行为需要关注:分别关注感知到的负面后果和正面后果以及对这种行为的感受,如受伤和节省时间;关于朋友/同伴的赞成角色和家庭的反对角色;并把对事故的恐惧作为障碍,而把匆忙作为促进因素。需要更精确的定量研究来确定这些因素在此类危险行为中的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信