Method comparison study of peripheral blood CD34+ count performed on an Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire hematology analyzer versus flow cytometry reference procedure (modified ISHAGE)

Scott T. Avecilla, Cheryl Goss, Steven M. Marionneaux, Donald R. Wright, Tyler D. Leiva, Jo-ann Tonon, Katherine M. Smith, Peter Maslak
{"title":"Method comparison study of peripheral blood CD34+ count performed on an Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire hematology analyzer versus flow cytometry reference procedure (modified ISHAGE)","authors":"Scott T. Avecilla,&nbsp;Cheryl Goss,&nbsp;Steven M. Marionneaux,&nbsp;Donald R. Wright,&nbsp;Tyler D. Leiva,&nbsp;Jo-ann Tonon,&nbsp;Katherine M. Smith,&nbsp;Peter Maslak","doi":"10.1002/acg2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>CD34<sup>+</sup> cell enumeration is a critical parameter used to determine the timing of apheresis collections of hematopoietic progenitor cell products (HPC(A)). Automated hematology analyzers equipped with flow cytometry capabilities may be a solution to the problem of limited access to standard flow cytometry testing. We compared CD34<sup>+</sup> cell enumeration using a reference flow cytometry procedure employing modified International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) analysis with a hematology analyzer/flow cytometer hybrid (CELL DYN (CD)Sapphire) using a sequential gating analysis designed to emulate the ISHAGE gating strategy. CD34<sup>+</sup> cell values obtained from the ISHAGE and CD Sapphire analysis was plotted and compared in a linear regression analysis which showed a high degree of correlation (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.96). No statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.53) differences in CD34<sup>+</sup> cell enumeration values were observed between the flow cytometer and automated hematology analyzer using manual analysis schema. We have demonstrated that an automated hematology analyzer equipped with a flow module can provide CD34<sup>+</sup> cell enumeration results in the peripheral blood for clinical decision algorithms without the need for a dedicated flow cytometry laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":72084,"journal":{"name":"Advances in cell and gene therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/acg2.15","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in cell and gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acg2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

CD34+ cell enumeration is a critical parameter used to determine the timing of apheresis collections of hematopoietic progenitor cell products (HPC(A)). Automated hematology analyzers equipped with flow cytometry capabilities may be a solution to the problem of limited access to standard flow cytometry testing. We compared CD34+ cell enumeration using a reference flow cytometry procedure employing modified International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) analysis with a hematology analyzer/flow cytometer hybrid (CELL DYN (CD)Sapphire) using a sequential gating analysis designed to emulate the ISHAGE gating strategy. CD34+ cell values obtained from the ISHAGE and CD Sapphire analysis was plotted and compared in a linear regression analysis which showed a high degree of correlation (R2 = 0.96). No statistically significant (P = 0.53) differences in CD34+ cell enumeration values were observed between the flow cytometer and automated hematology analyzer using manual analysis schema. We have demonstrated that an automated hematology analyzer equipped with a flow module can provide CD34+ cell enumeration results in the peripheral blood for clinical decision algorithms without the need for a dedicated flow cytometry laboratory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雅培CELL-DYN蓝宝石血液学分析仪与流式细胞术参考程序(改进的ISHAGE)外周血CD34+计数的比较研究
CD34+细胞计数是确定造血祖细胞产品(HPC(a))采珠时间的关键参数。配备流式细胞仪功能的自动化血液学分析仪可能是解决标准流式细胞仪检测受限问题的一种解决方案。我们比较了CD34+细胞计数使用参考流式细胞术程序,采用改进的国际血液治疗和移植物工程学会(ISHAGE)分析与血液分析仪/流式细胞仪混合(cell DYN (CD)Sapphire),使用旨在模拟ISHAGE门控策略的顺序门控分析。从ISHAGE和CD Sapphire分析中获得的CD34+细胞值被绘制并在线性回归分析中进行比较,结果显示高度相关(R2 = 0.96)。流式细胞仪CD34+细胞计数值与手工血液学全自动血液学分析仪比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.53)。我们已经证明,配备流动模块的自动血液学分析仪可以提供外周血中的CD34+细胞计数结果,用于临床决策算法,而无需专门的流式细胞术实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信