Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-02-03 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/9709242
Alfredo Escartín, Marta González, Elena Cuello, Ana Pinillos, Pablo Muriel, Mireia Merichal, Victor Palacios, Jordi Escoll, Cristina Gas, Jorge-Juan Olsina
{"title":"Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications.","authors":"Alfredo Escartín,&nbsp;Marta González,&nbsp;Elena Cuello,&nbsp;Ana Pinillos,&nbsp;Pablo Muriel,&nbsp;Mireia Merichal,&nbsp;Victor Palacios,&nbsp;Jordi Escoll,&nbsp;Cristina Gas,&nbsp;Jorge-Juan Olsina","doi":"10.1155/2019/9709242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute cholecystitis in patients ≥80 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective single-center patient registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was composed of 348 patients, which were divided into two groups: those younger (Group A) and those older (Group B) than the median age (85.4 years). Although demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, the disease management was clearly different, with older patients undergoing cholecystectomy less frequently (<i>n</i>=80 46.0% in Group A vs <i>n</i>=39 22.4% in Group B; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The outcomes in both groups of age were similar, with 30-day mortality of 3.7%, morbidity of 17.2%, and readmissions of 4.2% and two-year AC recurrence in nonoperated patients of 22.5%. No differences were seen between operated and no operated patients. Severe (Grade III) AC was the only independent factor significantly associated with mortality (OR 86.05 (95% CI: 11-679); <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In elderly patients with AC, the choice of therapeutic options was not limited by the age per se, but rather by the disease severity (grade III AC) and/or poor physical status (ASA III-IV). In case of grade I-II AC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed and yield good results even in very old patients. Patients with grade III AC present high risk of morbidity and mortality, and the treatment should be individualized. ASA IV patients should avoid cholecystectomy, being antibiotic treatment and cholecystectomy the best option.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2019 ","pages":"9709242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/9709242","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9709242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute cholecystitis in patients ≥80 years.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective single-center patient registry.

Results: The study population was composed of 348 patients, which were divided into two groups: those younger (Group A) and those older (Group B) than the median age (85.4 years). Although demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, the disease management was clearly different, with older patients undergoing cholecystectomy less frequently (n=80 46.0% in Group A vs n=39 22.4% in Group B; p < 0.001). The outcomes in both groups of age were similar, with 30-day mortality of 3.7%, morbidity of 17.2%, and readmissions of 4.2% and two-year AC recurrence in nonoperated patients of 22.5%. No differences were seen between operated and no operated patients. Severe (Grade III) AC was the only independent factor significantly associated with mortality (OR 86.05 (95% CI: 11-679); p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In elderly patients with AC, the choice of therapeutic options was not limited by the age per se, but rather by the disease severity (grade III AC) and/or poor physical status (ASA III-IV). In case of grade I-II AC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed and yield good results even in very old patients. Patients with grade III AC present high risk of morbidity and mortality, and the treatment should be individualized. ASA IV patients should avoid cholecystectomy, being antibiotic treatment and cholecystectomy the best option.

高龄急性胆囊炎患者:疾病管理、结局和并发症的危险因素
背景:本研究的目的是评估≥80岁急性胆囊炎患者的特征、治疗和结局。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性单中心患者登记的数据。结果:研究人群由348例患者组成,分为两组:低于中位年龄(85.4岁)的患者(A组)和高于中位年龄(85.4岁)的患者(B组)。虽然两组的人口学和临床特征相似,但疾病处理明显不同,老年患者行胆囊切除术的频率较低(A组n=80 46.0% vs B组n=39 22.4%;P < 0.001)。两组年龄组的结果相似,30天死亡率为3.7%,发病率为17.2%,再入院率为4.2%,未手术患者2年AC复发率为22.5%。手术与未手术患者之间无差异。严重(III级)AC是唯一与死亡率显著相关的独立因素(OR 86.05 (95% CI: 11-679);P < 0.001)。结论:在老年AC患者中,治疗方案的选择不受年龄本身的限制,而是受疾病严重程度(III级AC)和/或身体状况不佳(ASA III- iv)的限制。对于I-II级AC,腹腔镜胆囊切除术可以安全进行,即使在非常老的患者中也能获得良好的效果。III级AC患者存在较高的发病率和死亡率,治疗应个体化。ASA IV期患者应避免胆囊切除术,以抗生素治疗和胆囊切除术为最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信