Cognitive Reserve Moderates Older Adults' Memory Errors in Autobiographical Reality Monitoring Task.

Q3 Psychology
Psychology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-17 DOI:10.1037/pne0000161
Kyle R Kraemer, Tasnuva Enam, Ian M McDonough
{"title":"Cognitive Reserve Moderates Older Adults' Memory Errors in Autobiographical Reality Monitoring Task.","authors":"Kyle R Kraemer,&nbsp;Tasnuva Enam,&nbsp;Ian M McDonough","doi":"10.1037/pne0000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>False memory rates differ in individuals with high versus low cognitive reserve and between young-old and old-old age groups. Here we tested how two types of false memory (false alarms to new items and source memory) in two age groups differed with cognitive reserve. Subjects were presented with words and either instructed to generate a past event from their memory associated with the word or to imagine a future event associated with the word. At test, participants were instructed to determine whether the event was a past, future, or new event. Results showed overall false memory rates were lower for young-old adults and those with high reserve. Critically, low cognitive reserve was most associated with source memory errors in young-old but not old-old adults. Reflecting the opposite pattern, false alarms to new items were most associated with low cognitive reserve for old-old, but not young-old adults. These results seem to suggest two different classes of false memories in old age. That is, cognitive reserve was most protective for familiar lures in earlier stages of old age, whereas it was most protective for new lures in later stages of old age. These results support the idea that retrieval monitoring deteriorates with age, potentially due to declines in working memory capacity, but that the decline may be attenuated by cognitive reserve. Furthermore, we suggest that different levels of working memory capacity may be required for monitoring source memory versus item memory, leading to differential effects of cognitive reserve depending upon age.</p>","PeriodicalId":39094,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Neuroscience","volume":"12 2","pages":"247-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553653/pdf/nihms-1030644.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

False memory rates differ in individuals with high versus low cognitive reserve and between young-old and old-old age groups. Here we tested how two types of false memory (false alarms to new items and source memory) in two age groups differed with cognitive reserve. Subjects were presented with words and either instructed to generate a past event from their memory associated with the word or to imagine a future event associated with the word. At test, participants were instructed to determine whether the event was a past, future, or new event. Results showed overall false memory rates were lower for young-old adults and those with high reserve. Critically, low cognitive reserve was most associated with source memory errors in young-old but not old-old adults. Reflecting the opposite pattern, false alarms to new items were most associated with low cognitive reserve for old-old, but not young-old adults. These results seem to suggest two different classes of false memories in old age. That is, cognitive reserve was most protective for familiar lures in earlier stages of old age, whereas it was most protective for new lures in later stages of old age. These results support the idea that retrieval monitoring deteriorates with age, potentially due to declines in working memory capacity, but that the decline may be attenuated by cognitive reserve. Furthermore, we suggest that different levels of working memory capacity may be required for monitoring source memory versus item memory, leading to differential effects of cognitive reserve depending upon age.

Abstract Image

认知储备调节老年人自传体现实监测任务中的记忆错误。
错误记忆率在认知储备高与低的个体以及年轻、年老和年老年龄组之间存在差异。在这里,我们测试了两种类型的错误记忆(对新事物的错误警报和源记忆)在两个年龄组中与认知储备的差异。研究人员向受试者展示了一些单词,并要求他们根据记忆中与该单词相关的过去事件或想象与该单词相关的未来事件。在测试中,参与者被要求判断这个事件是过去的、未来的还是新的。结果显示,年轻老年人和记忆力储备高的人的总体错误记忆率较低。重要的是,低认知储备与年轻人的源记忆错误最相关,而与老年人无关。反映出相反的模式,对新事物的错误警报与老年人的认知储备较低最相关,但与年轻人无关。这些结果似乎表明,老年人有两种不同类型的错误记忆。也就是说,认知储备在老年早期对熟悉的诱饵最具保护作用,而在老年后期对新的诱饵最具保护作用。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即随着年龄的增长,检索监控会恶化,这可能是由于工作记忆容量的下降,但这种下降可能会被认知储备所减弱。此外,我们认为源记忆和项目记忆的工作记忆容量可能需要不同的水平,导致认知储备的不同影响取决于年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology and Neuroscience
Psychology and Neuroscience Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychology & Neuroscience publishes articles encompassing all intersection areas between psychology and neurosciences. The journal is organized into five thematic sections: Psychophysics and PerceptionBehavior/Systems/CognitionPlasticity and Neural DevelopmentClinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyNeuropsychopharmacology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信