The Contribution of Social Support, Professional Support, and Financial Hardship to Family Caregiver Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Scott A Sabella, Christopher S Suchan
{"title":"The Contribution of Social Support, Professional Support, and Financial Hardship to Family Caregiver Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Scott A Sabella,&nbsp;Christopher S Suchan","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(a) To assess whether 3 changeable environmental variables (social support, professional support, and financial hardship) contribute to explaining differences in well-being of family caregivers after traumatic brain injury (TBI), above and beyond the influence of neurobehavioral functioning. (b) To assess the unique and relative contribution of social support, professional support, and financial hardship to life satisfaction of family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult family caregivers (n = 136) of individuals who received inpatient rehabilitation following a TBI.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The Social Provisions Scale; Brief Scale of Financial Hardship after Brain Injury; Satisfaction with Life Scale; and adapted scales measuring professional support and neurobehavioral functioning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using survey methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social support, professional support, and financial hardship explained a significant amount of variance in life satisfaction after controlling for neurobehavioral functioning (R change = 0.34, considered a large effect size). Social support and financial hardship were significant unique predictors within the model, but professional support was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social support and financial hardship are prominent environmental variables that may hold promise for targeted intervention development and testing designed to support family adaptation after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000471","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objectives: (a) To assess whether 3 changeable environmental variables (social support, professional support, and financial hardship) contribute to explaining differences in well-being of family caregivers after traumatic brain injury (TBI), above and beyond the influence of neurobehavioral functioning. (b) To assess the unique and relative contribution of social support, professional support, and financial hardship to life satisfaction of family caregivers.

Participants: Adult family caregivers (n = 136) of individuals who received inpatient rehabilitation following a TBI.

Measures: The Social Provisions Scale; Brief Scale of Financial Hardship after Brain Injury; Satisfaction with Life Scale; and adapted scales measuring professional support and neurobehavioral functioning.

Design: Cross-sectional study using survey methodology.

Results: Social support, professional support, and financial hardship explained a significant amount of variance in life satisfaction after controlling for neurobehavioral functioning (R change = 0.34, considered a large effect size). Social support and financial hardship were significant unique predictors within the model, but professional support was not.

Conclusion: Social support and financial hardship are prominent environmental variables that may hold promise for targeted intervention development and testing designed to support family adaptation after TBI.

创伤性脑损伤后社会支持、专业支持和经济困难对家庭照顾者生活满意度的影响。
目的:(a)评估3个可改变的环境变量(社会支持、专业支持和经济困难)是否有助于解释创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后家庭照顾者幸福感的差异,超出神经行为功能的影响。(b)评估社会支持、专业支持和经济困难对家庭照顾者生活满意度的独特和相对贡献。参与者:创伤性脑损伤后接受住院康复治疗的成人家庭照顾者(n = 136)。措施:社会保障量表;脑损伤后经济困难简易量表生活满意度量表;以及适应的测量专业支持和神经行为功能的量表。设计:采用调查方法进行横断面研究。结果:在控制神经行为功能后,社会支持、专业支持和经济困难解释了生活满意度的显著差异(R变化= 0.34,被认为是一个大的效应量)。社会支持和经济困难是模型中显著的独特预测因素,但专业支持不是。结论:社会支持和经济困难是突出的环境变量,可能为有针对性的干预开发和测试提供希望,旨在支持创伤性脑损伤后的家庭适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书