Comparison of subcutaneous dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia: a randomized double blind control trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2019-04-05 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S197386
Divya B Srinivas, Geetha Lakshminarasimhaiah
{"title":"Comparison of subcutaneous dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia: a randomized double blind control trial.","authors":"Divya B Srinivas,&nbsp;Geetha Lakshminarasimhaiah","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S197386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia and improve the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB) when used as adjuvant in various routes. However, addition of these drugs by IV or intrathecal routes are known to cause hemodynamic instability. The subcutaneous (SC) route provides similar efficacy as IV administration with less hemodynamic instability and prolonged effect. <b>Aims</b>: To compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to SAB when used subcutaneously. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A total of 90 patients were randomized into one of the three groups: Group P received 1 ml of Normal saline SC, Group D received 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmeditomedine SC and Group C received 1 mcg/kg of clonidine SC respectively after SAB with 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg). Time of onset of sensory and motor block, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative VAS scores, Richmond agitation sedation scale, duration of postoperative analgesia and mean paracetamol requirement in 24 hours were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Mean duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in group D (838.10±348.22 minutes) and group C (816.67±230.48 minutes) when compared to group P (332.10±110.91 minutes). Total paracetamol consumption was less in group D (1400.00±770.13 mg) and group C (1600.00±674.66 mg), whereas it was 1900.00±758.86 mg in group P. Hemodynamic parameters, maximum sensory level attained, and time to attain maximum sensory levels were comparable among the two groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both subcutaneous clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic requirements when used as adjuvants to SAB with stable hemodynamics, hence both of these drugs can be used effectively as adjuvants to SAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"12 ","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S197386","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S197386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia and improve the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB) when used as adjuvant in various routes. However, addition of these drugs by IV or intrathecal routes are known to cause hemodynamic instability. The subcutaneous (SC) route provides similar efficacy as IV administration with less hemodynamic instability and prolonged effect. Aims: To compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to SAB when used subcutaneously. Materials and methods: A total of 90 patients were randomized into one of the three groups: Group P received 1 ml of Normal saline SC, Group D received 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmeditomedine SC and Group C received 1 mcg/kg of clonidine SC respectively after SAB with 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg). Time of onset of sensory and motor block, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative VAS scores, Richmond agitation sedation scale, duration of postoperative analgesia and mean paracetamol requirement in 24 hours were recorded. Results: Mean duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in group D (838.10±348.22 minutes) and group C (816.67±230.48 minutes) when compared to group P (332.10±110.91 minutes). Total paracetamol consumption was less in group D (1400.00±770.13 mg) and group C (1600.00±674.66 mg), whereas it was 1900.00±758.86 mg in group P. Hemodynamic parameters, maximum sensory level attained, and time to attain maximum sensory levels were comparable among the two groups. Conclusion: Both subcutaneous clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic requirements when used as adjuvants to SAB with stable hemodynamics, hence both of these drugs can be used effectively as adjuvants to SAB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

皮下右美托咪定与可乐定作为脊髓麻醉辅助剂的比较:一项随机双盲对照试验。
背景:克拉定、右美托咪定等α -2肾上腺素能激动剂作为多种途径的辅助用药,可延长术后镇痛时间,改善蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)质量。然而,静脉注射或鞘内注射这些药物会引起血流动力学不稳定。皮下(SC)途径提供与静脉给药相似的疗效,血流动力学不稳定性较小,效果延长。目的:比较可乐定和右美托咪定作为佐剂皮下注射SAB的疗效。材料与方法:90例患者随机分为3组:P组在经0.5%高压布比卡因(15 mg) 3ml SAB后,分别给予生理盐水SC 1 ml,右美托美啶SC 0.5 mcg/kg,可乐定SC 1 mcg/kg。记录感觉和运动阻滞发生时间、术中血流动力学、术后VAS评分、Richmond躁动镇静评分、术后镇痛持续时间、24小时平均扑热息痛需用量。结果:术后平均镇痛时间D组(838.10±348.22 min)、C组(816.67±230.48 min)较P组(332.10±110.91 min)明显延长。D组(1400.00±770.13 mg)和C组(1600.00±674.66 mg)的对乙酰氨基酚总消耗量较低,p组(1900.00±758.86 mg),两组血流动力学参数、达到的最大感觉水平和达到最大感觉水平的时间具有可比性。结论:皮下clonidine和右美托咪定作为SAB的佐剂均可延长术后镇痛时间,减少镇痛需求,血流动力学稳定,可作为SAB的佐剂有效使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信