Preclinical Models of Alzheimer's Disease: Relevance and Translational Validity

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Kevin Mullane, Michael Williams
{"title":"Preclinical Models of Alzheimer's Disease: Relevance and Translational Validity","authors":"Kevin Mullane,&nbsp;Michael Williams","doi":"10.1002/cpph.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The only drugs currently approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) are four acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and the NMDA antagonist memantine. Apart from these drugs, which have minimal to no clinical benefit, the 40-year search for effective therapeutics to treat AD has resulted in a clinical failure rate of 100% not only for compounds that prevent brain amyloid deposition or remove existing amyloid plaques but also those acting by a variety of other putative disease-associated mechanisms. This indicates that the preclinical data generated from current AD targets to support the selection, optimization, and translation of new chemical entities (NCEs) and biologics to clinical trials is seriously compromised. While many of these failures reflect flawed hypotheses or a lack of adequate characterization of the preclinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PD/PK) properties of lead NCEs—including their bioavailability and toxicity—the conceptualization, validation, and interrogation of the current animal models of AD represent key limitations. The overwhelming majority of these AD models are transgenic, based on aspects of the amyloid hypothesis and the genetics of the familial form of the disease. As a result, these generally lack construct and predictive validity for the sporadic form of the human disease. The 170 or so transgenic models, perhaps the largest number ever focused on a single disease, use rodents, mainly mice, and in addition to amyloid also address aspects of tau causality with more complex multigene models including other presumed causative factors together with amyloid. This overview discusses the current animal models of AD in the context of both the controversies surrounding the causative role of amyloid in the disease and the need to develop validated models of cognitive function/dysfunction that more appropriately reflect the phenotype(s) of human aged-related dementias. © 2019 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":10871,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Pharmacology","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpph.57","citationCount":"89","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpph.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89

Abstract

The only drugs currently approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) are four acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and the NMDA antagonist memantine. Apart from these drugs, which have minimal to no clinical benefit, the 40-year search for effective therapeutics to treat AD has resulted in a clinical failure rate of 100% not only for compounds that prevent brain amyloid deposition or remove existing amyloid plaques but also those acting by a variety of other putative disease-associated mechanisms. This indicates that the preclinical data generated from current AD targets to support the selection, optimization, and translation of new chemical entities (NCEs) and biologics to clinical trials is seriously compromised. While many of these failures reflect flawed hypotheses or a lack of adequate characterization of the preclinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PD/PK) properties of lead NCEs—including their bioavailability and toxicity—the conceptualization, validation, and interrogation of the current animal models of AD represent key limitations. The overwhelming majority of these AD models are transgenic, based on aspects of the amyloid hypothesis and the genetics of the familial form of the disease. As a result, these generally lack construct and predictive validity for the sporadic form of the human disease. The 170 or so transgenic models, perhaps the largest number ever focused on a single disease, use rodents, mainly mice, and in addition to amyloid also address aspects of tau causality with more complex multigene models including other presumed causative factors together with amyloid. This overview discusses the current animal models of AD in the context of both the controversies surrounding the causative role of amyloid in the disease and the need to develop validated models of cognitive function/dysfunction that more appropriately reflect the phenotype(s) of human aged-related dementias. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

阿尔茨海默病的临床前模型:相关性和转化有效性
目前唯一被批准用于治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的药物是四种乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂和NMDA拮抗剂美金刚。除了这些几乎没有临床疗效的药物外,40年来对阿尔茨海默病有效治疗方法的研究导致临床失败率为100%,不仅是那些防止脑淀粉样蛋白沉积或去除现有淀粉样斑块的化合物,还有那些由各种其他假定的疾病相关机制起作用的化合物。这表明,从当前AD靶点生成的用于支持新化学实体(NCEs)和生物制剂的选择、优化和转化到临床试验的临床前数据受到严重损害。虽然许多失败反映了有缺陷的假设或缺乏对铅ncs的临床前药效学和药代动力学(PD/PK)特性(包括其生物利用度和毒性)的充分表征,但对当前AD动物模型的概念化、验证和询问代表了关键的局限性。这些阿尔茨海默病模型绝大多数是转基因的,基于淀粉样蛋白假说和该疾病家族形式的遗传学方面。因此,这些通常缺乏对人类疾病散发形式的构建和预测有效性。大约有170个转基因模型,可能是迄今为止最多的针对单一疾病的转基因模型,它们使用啮齿类动物,主要是小鼠,除了淀粉样蛋白,还使用更复杂的多基因模型,包括淀粉样蛋白和其他假定的致病因素,来研究tau蛋白的因果关系。这篇综述讨论了当前AD的动物模型,包括围绕淀粉样蛋白在该疾病中的致病作用的争议,以及开发更合适地反映人类年龄相关痴呆表型的认知功能/功能障碍的验证模型的必要性。©2019 by John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Protocols in Pharmacology
Current Protocols in Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信