The Effects of Probability Threshold Choice on an Adjustment for Guessing using the Rasch Model.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Glenn Thomas Waterbury, Christine E DeMars
{"title":"The Effects of Probability Threshold Choice on an Adjustment for Guessing using the Rasch Model.","authors":"Glenn Thomas Waterbury,&nbsp;Christine E DeMars","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper investigates a strategy for accounting for correct guessing with the Rasch model that we entitled the Guessing Adjustment. This strategy involves the identification of all person/item encounters where the probability of a correct response is below a specified threshold. These responses are converted to missing data and the calibration is conducted a second time. This simulation study focuses on the effects of different probability thresholds across varying conditions of sample size, amount of correct guessing, and item difficulty. Biases, standard errors, and root mean squared errors were calculated within each condition. Larger probability thresholds were generally associated with reductions in bias and increases in standard errors. Across most conditions, the reduction in bias was more impactful than the decrease in precision, as reflected by the RMSE. The Guessing Adjustment is an effective means for reducing the impact of correct guessing and the choice of probability threshold matters.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates a strategy for accounting for correct guessing with the Rasch model that we entitled the Guessing Adjustment. This strategy involves the identification of all person/item encounters where the probability of a correct response is below a specified threshold. These responses are converted to missing data and the calibration is conducted a second time. This simulation study focuses on the effects of different probability thresholds across varying conditions of sample size, amount of correct guessing, and item difficulty. Biases, standard errors, and root mean squared errors were calculated within each condition. Larger probability thresholds were generally associated with reductions in bias and increases in standard errors. Across most conditions, the reduction in bias was more impactful than the decrease in precision, as reflected by the RMSE. The Guessing Adjustment is an effective means for reducing the impact of correct guessing and the choice of probability threshold matters.

概率阈值选择对使用Rasch模型的猜测调整的影响。
本文研究了一种用Rasch模型来计算正确猜测的策略,我们称之为猜测调整。该策略涉及识别所有遇到的正确反应概率低于指定阈值的人/物。这些响应被转换为缺失数据,并进行第二次校准。这个模拟研究的重点是不同的概率阈值在不同条件下的样本量,正确猜测量和项目难度的影响。在每个条件下计算偏倚、标准误差和均方根误差。较大的概率阈值通常与偏倚减少和标准误差增加有关。在大多数情况下,偏差的减少比精度的降低更有影响,正如RMSE所反映的那样。猜测调整是减少正确猜测和概率阈值选择影响的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信