Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity during an Isometric Squat between Strength-Matched Men and Women.

IF 2.4
Journal of sports science & medicine Pub Date : 2019-02-11 eCollection Date: 2019-03-01
Sophia Nimphius, Jeffrey M McBride, Paige E Rice, Courtney L Goodman-Capps, Christopher R Capps
{"title":"Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity during an Isometric Squat between Strength-Matched Men and Women.","authors":"Sophia Nimphius,&nbsp;Jeffrey M McBride,&nbsp;Paige E Rice,&nbsp;Courtney L Goodman-Capps,&nbsp;Christopher R Capps","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine whether strength-matched men and women exhibit a different magnitude and ratio of leg muscle activity during a maximal voluntary isometric squat. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of normalization method on differences in strength between men and women. Thirty-two men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) were successfully strength-matched (≤10% difference) by maximal force produced during an isometric squat (IS) when normalized to body weight. Subjects first performed a maximal isometric knee extension (IKE) and knee flexion (IKF) followed by the IS and muscle activity (EMG<sub>max</sub>) was recorded for the vastus medialis (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF). Muscle activity during the IS was expressed relative to the maximums observed during the IKE and IKF (%EMG<sub>max</sub>). The results indicate that VMO, VL, ST and BF %EMG<sub>max</sub> were not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.05) between men and women during the IS (Men VMO = 136.7 ± 24.9%, Women VMO = 157.1 ± 59.8%, Men VL = 126.2 ± 38.2%, Women VL = 128.1 ± 35.5%, Men ST = 25.5 ± 13.6%, Women ST = 25.2 ± 21.8%, Men BF = 46.1 ± 26.0%, Women BF = 42.2 ± 24.8%). Furthermore, the VMO:VL and hamstring to quadriceps (H:Q) %EMG<sub>max</sub> ratio were not significantly different between groups in the IS (Men VMO:VL = 1.15 ± 0.28, Women VMO:VL = 1.22 ± 0.26, Men H:Q = 0.28 ± 0.14, Women H:Q = 0.24 ± 0.20). This investigation indicates that the magnitude of muscle activity and the ratios examined are not significantly different between men and women in a maximal voluntary isometric squat when matched for normalized strength. Future investigations should consider subject strength and normalization procedures in the experimental design to elucidate possible sex differences in neuromuscular performance capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370970/pdf/jssm-18-101.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine whether strength-matched men and women exhibit a different magnitude and ratio of leg muscle activity during a maximal voluntary isometric squat. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of normalization method on differences in strength between men and women. Thirty-two men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) were successfully strength-matched (≤10% difference) by maximal force produced during an isometric squat (IS) when normalized to body weight. Subjects first performed a maximal isometric knee extension (IKE) and knee flexion (IKF) followed by the IS and muscle activity (EMGmax) was recorded for the vastus medialis (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF). Muscle activity during the IS was expressed relative to the maximums observed during the IKE and IKF (%EMGmax). The results indicate that VMO, VL, ST and BF %EMGmax were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between men and women during the IS (Men VMO = 136.7 ± 24.9%, Women VMO = 157.1 ± 59.8%, Men VL = 126.2 ± 38.2%, Women VL = 128.1 ± 35.5%, Men ST = 25.5 ± 13.6%, Women ST = 25.2 ± 21.8%, Men BF = 46.1 ± 26.0%, Women BF = 42.2 ± 24.8%). Furthermore, the VMO:VL and hamstring to quadriceps (H:Q) %EMGmax ratio were not significantly different between groups in the IS (Men VMO:VL = 1.15 ± 0.28, Women VMO:VL = 1.22 ± 0.26, Men H:Q = 0.28 ± 0.14, Women H:Q = 0.24 ± 0.20). This investigation indicates that the magnitude of muscle activity and the ratios examined are not significantly different between men and women in a maximal voluntary isometric squat when matched for normalized strength. Future investigations should consider subject strength and normalization procedures in the experimental design to elucidate possible sex differences in neuromuscular performance capabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

力量匹配的男性和女性在等长深蹲时股四头肌和腘绳肌活动的比较。
本研究的主要目的是确定力量匹配的男性和女性在最大自主等距深蹲时是否表现出不同的腿部肌肉活动幅度和比例。次要目的是评估归一化方法对男女力量差异的影响。32名男性(n = 16)和女性(n = 16)成功地通过等距深蹲(IS)中产生的最大力量与体重标准化后的力量匹配(差异≤10%)。受试者首先进行最大等距膝关节伸展(IKE)和膝关节屈曲(IKF),然后进行IS和肌肉活动(EMGmax),记录股内侧肌(VMO)、股外侧肌(VL)、半腱肌(ST)和股二头肌(BF)。IS期间的肌肉活动相对于IKE和IKF期间观察到的最大值(%EMGmax)表示。结果表明,在IS期间,男性VMO = 136.7±24.9%,女性VMO = 157.1±59.8%,男性VL = 126.2±38.2%,女性VL = 128.1±35.5%,男性ST = 25.5±13.6%,女性ST = 25.2±21.8%,男性BF = 46.1±26.0%,女性BF = 42.2±24.8%,男性VMO、VL、ST、BF %EMGmax差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。此外,IS组间VMO:VL和腘绳肌与股四头肌(H:Q) %EMGmax比值(男性VMO:VL = 1.15±0.28,女性VMO:VL = 1.22±0.26,男性H:Q = 0.28±0.14,女性H:Q = 0.24±0.20)差异无统计学意义。这项调查表明,当与标准化力量相匹配时,在最大自愿等距深蹲中,男性和女性的肌肉活动幅度和所检查的比例没有显著差异。未来的研究应在实验设计中考虑受试者的力量和标准化程序,以阐明神经肌肉表现能力可能存在的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书