SDF-1 plasmid treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (STOP-PAD): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Vascular Medicine (London, England) Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-21 DOI:10.1177/1358863X18817610
Mehdi H Shishehbor, John Rundback, Matthew Bunte, Tarek A Hammad, Leslie Miller, Parag D Patel, Saihari Sadanandan, Michael Fitzgerald, Joseph Pastore, Vikram Kashyap, Timothy D Henry
{"title":"SDF-1 plasmid treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (STOP-PAD): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Mehdi H Shishehbor,&nbsp;John Rundback,&nbsp;Matthew Bunte,&nbsp;Tarek A Hammad,&nbsp;Leslie Miller,&nbsp;Parag D Patel,&nbsp;Saihari Sadanandan,&nbsp;Michael Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Joseph Pastore,&nbsp;Vikram Kashyap,&nbsp;Timothy D Henry","doi":"10.1177/1358863X18817610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of biologic therapies in critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains elusive, in part, due to limitations in trial design and patient selection. Using a novel design, we examined the impact of complementing revascularization therapy with intramuscular JVS-100 - a non-viral gene therapy that activates endogenous regenerative repair pathways. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2B trial, we randomized 109 patients with CLI (Rutherford class V or VI) to 8 mg or 16 mg intramuscular injections of placebo versus JVS-100. Patients were eligible if they persistently had reduced forefoot perfusion, by toe-brachial index (TBI) or skin perfusion pressure (SPP), following successful revascularization with angiographic demonstration of tibial arterial flow to the ankle. The primary efficacy end point was a 3-month wound healing score assessed by an independent wound core laboratory. The primary safety end point was major adverse limb events (MALE). Patients' mean age was 71 years, 33% were women, 79% had diabetes, and 8% had end-stage renal disease. TBI after revascularization was 0.26, 0.27, and 0.26 among the three groups (placebo, 8 mg, and 16 mg injections, respectively). Only 26% of wounds completely healed at 3 months, without any differences between the three groups (26.5%, 26.5%, and 25%, respectively). Similarly, there were no significant changes in TBI at 3 months. Three (2.8%) patients died and two (1.8%) had major amputations. Rates of MALE at 3 months were 8.8%, 20%, and 8.3%, respectively. While safe, JVS-100 failed to improve wound healing or hemodynamic measures at 3 months. Only one-quarter of CLI wounds healed at 3 months despite successful revascularization, highlighting the need for additional research in therapies that can improve microcirculation in these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02544204.</p>","PeriodicalId":151049,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1358863X18817610","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18817610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The efficacy of biologic therapies in critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains elusive, in part, due to limitations in trial design and patient selection. Using a novel design, we examined the impact of complementing revascularization therapy with intramuscular JVS-100 - a non-viral gene therapy that activates endogenous regenerative repair pathways. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2B trial, we randomized 109 patients with CLI (Rutherford class V or VI) to 8 mg or 16 mg intramuscular injections of placebo versus JVS-100. Patients were eligible if they persistently had reduced forefoot perfusion, by toe-brachial index (TBI) or skin perfusion pressure (SPP), following successful revascularization with angiographic demonstration of tibial arterial flow to the ankle. The primary efficacy end point was a 3-month wound healing score assessed by an independent wound core laboratory. The primary safety end point was major adverse limb events (MALE). Patients' mean age was 71 years, 33% were women, 79% had diabetes, and 8% had end-stage renal disease. TBI after revascularization was 0.26, 0.27, and 0.26 among the three groups (placebo, 8 mg, and 16 mg injections, respectively). Only 26% of wounds completely healed at 3 months, without any differences between the three groups (26.5%, 26.5%, and 25%, respectively). Similarly, there were no significant changes in TBI at 3 months. Three (2.8%) patients died and two (1.8%) had major amputations. Rates of MALE at 3 months were 8.8%, 20%, and 8.3%, respectively. While safe, JVS-100 failed to improve wound healing or hemodynamic measures at 3 months. Only one-quarter of CLI wounds healed at 3 months despite successful revascularization, highlighting the need for additional research in therapies that can improve microcirculation in these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02544204.

SDF-1质粒治疗外周动脉疾病(STOP-PAD):随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验
由于试验设计和患者选择的限制,生物疗法对严重肢体缺血(CLI)的疗效仍然难以捉摸。使用一种新颖的设计,我们研究了肌肉注射JVS-100(一种激活内源性再生修复途径的非病毒基因疗法)补充血运重建治疗的影响。在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、2B期试验中,我们将109例CLI (Rutherford class V或VI)患者随机分为8 mg或16 mg肌肉注射安慰剂和JVS-100。通过足趾肱指数(TBI)或皮肤灌注压(SPP),在血管造影显示胫骨动脉流向踝关节成功重建后,如果患者持续出现前足灌注减少,则符合条件。主要疗效终点是由独立创面中心实验室评估的3个月创面愈合评分。主要安全终点是主要肢体不良事件(MALE)。患者平均年龄为71岁,33%为女性,79%患有糖尿病,8%患有终末期肾病。三组(分别注射安慰剂、8 mg和16 mg)血运重建术后TBI分别为0.26、0.27和0.26。只有26%的伤口在3个月时完全愈合,三组之间没有任何差异(分别为26.5%,26.5%和25%)。同样,3个月时TBI没有明显变化。3例(2.8%)死亡,2例(1.8%)严重截肢。3个月时男性发病率分别为8.8%、20%和8.3%。虽然安全,但JVS-100在3个月时未能改善伤口愈合或血液动力学指标。尽管血管重建术成功,但只有四分之一的CLI伤口在3个月后愈合,这表明需要进一步研究可以改善这些患者微循环的治疗方法。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02544204。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信