A search for new otomycotic species and their sensitivity to different antifungals.

Q2 Medicine
Mohammed Rifaat Ahmed, Ashraf Saad Abou-Halawa, Waheed F Hessam, Diaa' Salaheldin Aly Abdelkader
{"title":"A search for new otomycotic species and their sensitivity to different antifungals.","authors":"Mohammed Rifaat Ahmed,&nbsp;Ashraf Saad Abou-Halawa,&nbsp;Waheed F Hessam,&nbsp;Diaa' Salaheldin Aly Abdelkader","doi":"10.1556/1646.10.2018.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Otomycosis is a common ear problem in countries with hot and humid climate. Emergence of new fungal species is a possibility particularly in patients with chronic illness or who receives antibiotics either systemically or topically.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the otomycotic species, which are responsible for developing the otomycosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study was carried out in 63 patients who were clinically diagnosed with otomycosis. Swabs were taken from the fungal debris to identify the causative agent and to determine the effective antifungals against it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Aspergillus</i> species were the most common agents and were found in 47 patients (74.6%), represented by <i>A. fumigatus</i> (36.5%), <i>A. niger</i> (27%), <i>A. flavus</i> (6.5%), and <i>A. terreus</i> (4.8%). Ketoconazole (90%) and miconazole (76%) were the most effective antifungals against the species obtained from cultures, whereas fluconazole was the least effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is no change in the mycology of otomycosis, there is still a significant variability in the isolated species and in their sensitivity to antifungal drugs. Ketoconazole exhibited broad spectrum effect against fungal isolates in this study, whereas fluconazole was the least efficacious.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":"10 3","pages":"145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.10.2018.28","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Otomycosis is a common ear problem in countries with hot and humid climate. Emergence of new fungal species is a possibility particularly in patients with chronic illness or who receives antibiotics either systemically or topically.

Aim: To identify the otomycotic species, which are responsible for developing the otomycosis.

Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in 63 patients who were clinically diagnosed with otomycosis. Swabs were taken from the fungal debris to identify the causative agent and to determine the effective antifungals against it.

Results: Aspergillus species were the most common agents and were found in 47 patients (74.6%), represented by A. fumigatus (36.5%), A. niger (27%), A. flavus (6.5%), and A. terreus (4.8%). Ketoconazole (90%) and miconazole (76%) were the most effective antifungals against the species obtained from cultures, whereas fluconazole was the least effective.

Conclusions: Although there is no change in the mycology of otomycosis, there is still a significant variability in the isolated species and in their sensitivity to antifungal drugs. Ketoconazole exhibited broad spectrum effect against fungal isolates in this study, whereas fluconazole was the least efficacious.

寻找新的耳真菌种类及其对不同抗真菌药物的敏感性。
背景:耳真菌病是湿热气候国家常见的耳部疾病。出现新的真菌物种是一种可能性,特别是在患有慢性疾病或接受全身或局部抗生素治疗的患者中。目的:鉴定引起耳真菌病的耳真菌种类。方法:对63例临床诊断为耳真菌病的患者进行描述性研究。从真菌碎片中提取拭子以鉴定病原体并确定对其有效的抗真菌药物。结果:曲霉是最常见的病原菌,共47例(74.6%),依次为烟曲霉(36.5%)、黑曲霉(27%)、黄曲霉(6.5%)、土曲霉(4.8%)。酮康唑(90%)和咪康唑(76%)是对培养菌株最有效的抗真菌药物,而氟康唑的效果最差。结论:虽然耳真菌病的真菌学没有变化,但在分离种及其对抗真菌药物的敏感性方面仍存在显著差异。酮康唑对真菌分离物具有广谱作用,氟康唑效果最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信