Type 1 diabetes impairs the mobilisation of highly-differentiated CD8+T cells during a single bout of acute exercise.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Exercise Immunology Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Michelle Curran, John Campbell, Mark Drayson, Rob Andrews, Parth Narendran
{"title":"Type 1 diabetes impairs the mobilisation of highly-differentiated CD8+T cells during a single bout of acute exercise.","authors":"Michelle Curran,&nbsp;John Campbell,&nbsp;Mark Drayson,&nbsp;Rob Andrews,&nbsp;Parth Narendran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T cell mediated autoimmune disease that targets and destroys insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells. Beta cell specific T cells are highly differentiated and show evidence of previous antigen exposure. Exerciseinduced mobilisation of highly-differentiated CD8+ T cells facilitates immune surveillance and regulation. We aimed to explore exercise-induced T cell mobilisation in T1D. In this study, we compared the effects of a single bout of vigorous intensity exercise on T cell mobilisation in T1D and control participants. N=12 T1D (mean age 33.2yrs, predicted VO2 max 32.2 mL/(kg·min), BMI 25.3Kg/m2) and N=12 control (mean age 29.4yrs, predicted VO2 max 38.5mL(kg.min), BMI 23.7Kg/m2) male participants completed a 30-minute bout of cycling at 80% predicted VO2 max in a fasted state. Peripheral blood was collected at baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 1 hour post-exercise. Exercise-induced mobilisation was observed for T cells in both T1D and control groups. Total CD8+ T cells mobilised to a similar extent in T1D (42.7%; p=0.016) and controls (39.7%; p=0.001). CD8 effector memory CD45RA+ (EMRA) subset were the only T cell lineage subset to be significantly mobilised in both groups though the percentage increase of CD8+ EMRA was blunted in T1D (T1D (26.5%) p=0.004, control (66.1%) p=0.010). Further phenotyping of these subsets revealed that the blunting was most evident in CD8+ EMRA that expressed adhesion (CD11b: T1D 37.70%, Control 91.48%) and activation markers (CD69: T1D 29.87%, Control 161.43%), and appeared to be the most differentiated (CD27-CD28-: T1D 7.12%, Control 113.76%). CD4+ T cells mobilised during vigorous intensity exercise in controls (p=0.001), but not in T1D. The blunted mobilisation response of particular T cell subsets was not due to CMV serostatus or apparent differences in exertion during the exercise bout as defined by heart rate and RPE. Predicted VO2 max showed a trend to be lower in the T1D group than the control group but is unlikely to contribute to this blunted response. We postulate the reasons for a blunted mobilisation of differentiated CD8+ EMRA cells includes differences in blood glucose, adrenaline receptor density, and sequestration of T cells in the pancreas of T1D participants. In conclusion, mobilisation of CD8+ EMRA and CD4+ subsets T cells is decreased in people with T1D during acute exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":50468,"journal":{"name":"Exercise Immunology Review","volume":"25 ","pages":"64-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise Immunology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T cell mediated autoimmune disease that targets and destroys insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells. Beta cell specific T cells are highly differentiated and show evidence of previous antigen exposure. Exerciseinduced mobilisation of highly-differentiated CD8+ T cells facilitates immune surveillance and regulation. We aimed to explore exercise-induced T cell mobilisation in T1D. In this study, we compared the effects of a single bout of vigorous intensity exercise on T cell mobilisation in T1D and control participants. N=12 T1D (mean age 33.2yrs, predicted VO2 max 32.2 mL/(kg·min), BMI 25.3Kg/m2) and N=12 control (mean age 29.4yrs, predicted VO2 max 38.5mL(kg.min), BMI 23.7Kg/m2) male participants completed a 30-minute bout of cycling at 80% predicted VO2 max in a fasted state. Peripheral blood was collected at baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 1 hour post-exercise. Exercise-induced mobilisation was observed for T cells in both T1D and control groups. Total CD8+ T cells mobilised to a similar extent in T1D (42.7%; p=0.016) and controls (39.7%; p=0.001). CD8 effector memory CD45RA+ (EMRA) subset were the only T cell lineage subset to be significantly mobilised in both groups though the percentage increase of CD8+ EMRA was blunted in T1D (T1D (26.5%) p=0.004, control (66.1%) p=0.010). Further phenotyping of these subsets revealed that the blunting was most evident in CD8+ EMRA that expressed adhesion (CD11b: T1D 37.70%, Control 91.48%) and activation markers (CD69: T1D 29.87%, Control 161.43%), and appeared to be the most differentiated (CD27-CD28-: T1D 7.12%, Control 113.76%). CD4+ T cells mobilised during vigorous intensity exercise in controls (p=0.001), but not in T1D. The blunted mobilisation response of particular T cell subsets was not due to CMV serostatus or apparent differences in exertion during the exercise bout as defined by heart rate and RPE. Predicted VO2 max showed a trend to be lower in the T1D group than the control group but is unlikely to contribute to this blunted response. We postulate the reasons for a blunted mobilisation of differentiated CD8+ EMRA cells includes differences in blood glucose, adrenaline receptor density, and sequestration of T cells in the pancreas of T1D participants. In conclusion, mobilisation of CD8+ EMRA and CD4+ subsets T cells is decreased in people with T1D during acute exercise.

1型糖尿病在单次急性运动中损害高分化CD8+T细胞的动员。
1型糖尿病(T1D)是一种T细胞介导的自身免疫性疾病,其靶向并破坏分泌胰岛素的胰腺β细胞。β细胞特异性T细胞是高度分化的,并显示先前抗原暴露的证据。运动诱导的高分化CD8+ T细胞的动员有助于免疫监视和调节。我们的目的是探讨运动诱导的T细胞动员在T1D中的作用。在这项研究中,我们比较了单次剧烈运动对T1D参与者和对照组参与者T细胞动员的影响。试验组12名男性(平均年龄33.2岁,预测最大摄氧量32.2 mL/(kg·min), BMI 25.3Kg/m2),对照组12名男性(平均年龄29.4岁,预测最大摄氧量38.5mL(kg.min), BMI 23.7Kg/m2),在禁食状态下以80%预测最大摄氧量完成30分钟的自行车运动。在基线、运动后立即和运动后1小时采集外周血。T1D组和对照组均观察到运动诱导的T细胞动员。总CD8+ T细胞在T1D中被动员的程度相似(42.7%;P =0.016)和对照组(39.7%;p = 0.001)。CD8效应记忆CD45RA+ (EMRA)子集是两组中唯一显著动员的T细胞谱系子集,尽管CD8+ EMRA的百分比增加在T1D中被减弱(T1D (26.5%) p=0.004,对照组(66.1%)p=0.010)。这些亚群的进一步表型分析显示,表达粘附(CD11b: T1D 37.70%,对照组91.48%)和激活标记(CD69: T1D 29.87%,对照组161.43%)的CD8+ EMRA的钝化最为明显,并且分化程度最高(CD27-CD28-: T1D 7.12%,对照组113.76%)。在对照组中,CD4+ T细胞在剧烈运动期间被动员(p=0.001),但在T1D中没有。特定T细胞亚群的钝化动员反应不是由于CMV血清状态或运动期间由心率和RPE定义的运动强度的明显差异。预测的最大摄氧量在T1D组中显示出低于对照组的趋势,但不太可能导致这种迟钝的反应。我们假设分化的CD8+ EMRA细胞动员迟钝的原因包括血糖、肾上腺素受体密度的差异,以及T1D参与者胰腺中T细胞的隔离。总之,急性运动期间,T1D患者的CD8+ EMRA和CD4+亚群T细胞的动员减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Exercise Immunology Review
Exercise Immunology Review 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Exercise Immunology Review (EIR) serves as the official publication of the International Society of Exercise and Immunology and the German Society of Sports Medicine and Prevention. It is dedicated to advancing knowledge in all areas of immunology relevant to acute exercise and regular physical activity. EIR publishes review articles and papers containing new, original data along with extensive review-like discussions. Recognizing the diverse disciplines contributing to the understanding of immune function, the journal adopts an interdisciplinary approach, facilitating the dissemination of research findings from fields such as exercise sciences, medicine, immunology, physiology, behavioral science, endocrinology, pharmacology, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信