Aligning Formulary Restrictions Across a Health System and Improving Access to and Clarity of Medication Restrictions.

Q1 Medicine
P and T Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Sarah Solano, Jordan Dow, Terry Audley, Nitish Bangalore
{"title":"Aligning Formulary Restrictions Across a Health System and Improving Access to and Clarity of Medication Restrictions.","authors":"Sarah Solano,&nbsp;Jordan Dow,&nbsp;Terry Audley,&nbsp;Nitish Bangalore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2013, formulary medications were aligned among the three hospitals within our health system. However, as formulary medication restrictions were not aligned, the three hospitals continued to have inconsistent medication restrictions. This led to confusion among prescribers and pharmacists about which medications were restricted, what the restrictions were, and where to access information about the restrictions. To alleviate this confusion, we set out to align formulary restrictions and to provide medication restriction details at the points of entering and verifying medication orders.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to align 100% of the formulary medication restrictions at our health system. The secondary objectives were to improve ease of access to restriction information and to improve the clarity of medication restrictions for pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process of alignment involved completing a gap analysis to identify differences between each site's medication restrictions and site-specific interventions. The gap analysis, proposed restrictions, and proposed interventions were reviewed by the system's pharmacy, nutrition, and therapeutics (PNT) planning committee. The committee reviewed each medication, the restrictions, and the proposed modifications. The consensus of formulary medication restrictions was presented to the PNT committee for approval. Restriction information was added to each drug monograph in the online medication information database and the interventions were built into the electronic medical record (EMR). Five intervention types were included: restriction removal, \"outpatient use only\" added to the medication name, order-specific questions, alternative alerts, and information put into order instructions seen by both ordering providers and verifying pharmacists. Pharmacists were educated about the restricted medication-alignment initiative. A survey was administered after education to assess the ease of access to restricted medication information and clarity of medication restrictions. Because of the scope of this project, education and survey administration was limited to pharmacists only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aligned medication restrictions increased from 11% to 100%. Of the 110 medication restrictions that were not aligned, 17 restrictions were removed, 37 medications were restricted to outpatient use only, and 56 restricted medications were further aligned across the health system. Results from the survey showed that more pharmacists utilized the online medication information database to find information regarding restricted medications and that it was easier for more pharmacists to find this information.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"44 2","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6355055/pdf/ptj4402064.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2013, formulary medications were aligned among the three hospitals within our health system. However, as formulary medication restrictions were not aligned, the three hospitals continued to have inconsistent medication restrictions. This led to confusion among prescribers and pharmacists about which medications were restricted, what the restrictions were, and where to access information about the restrictions. To alleviate this confusion, we set out to align formulary restrictions and to provide medication restriction details at the points of entering and verifying medication orders.

Objectives: The primary objective was to align 100% of the formulary medication restrictions at our health system. The secondary objectives were to improve ease of access to restriction information and to improve the clarity of medication restrictions for pharmacists.

Methods: The process of alignment involved completing a gap analysis to identify differences between each site's medication restrictions and site-specific interventions. The gap analysis, proposed restrictions, and proposed interventions were reviewed by the system's pharmacy, nutrition, and therapeutics (PNT) planning committee. The committee reviewed each medication, the restrictions, and the proposed modifications. The consensus of formulary medication restrictions was presented to the PNT committee for approval. Restriction information was added to each drug monograph in the online medication information database and the interventions were built into the electronic medical record (EMR). Five intervention types were included: restriction removal, "outpatient use only" added to the medication name, order-specific questions, alternative alerts, and information put into order instructions seen by both ordering providers and verifying pharmacists. Pharmacists were educated about the restricted medication-alignment initiative. A survey was administered after education to assess the ease of access to restricted medication information and clarity of medication restrictions. Because of the scope of this project, education and survey administration was limited to pharmacists only.

Results: Aligned medication restrictions increased from 11% to 100%. Of the 110 medication restrictions that were not aligned, 17 restrictions were removed, 37 medications were restricted to outpatient use only, and 56 restricted medications were further aligned across the health system. Results from the survey showed that more pharmacists utilized the online medication information database to find information regarding restricted medications and that it was easier for more pharmacists to find this information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

调整整个卫生系统的处方限制,提高药物限制的可及性和明确性。
背景:2013年,我国卫生系统内的三家医院统一了处方药物。然而,由于处方药物限制不一致,三家医院的药物限制仍然不一致。这导致处方医生和药剂师对哪些药物是受限制的,限制是什么,以及在哪里可以获得有关限制的信息感到困惑。为了减轻这种混淆,我们开始调整处方限制,并在输入和验证药物订单时提供药物限制细节。目标:主要目标是使我国卫生系统100%的处方药物限制保持一致。次要目标是提高获取限制信息的便利性,并提高药师对药物限制的清晰度。方法:对齐过程包括完成差距分析,以确定每个站点的药物限制和站点特定干预措施之间的差异。差距分析、建议的限制和建议的干预措施由系统的药学、营养和治疗(PNT)计划委员会审查。委员会审查了每种药物、限制和建议的修改。处方药物限制的共识已提交给PNT委员会批准。将限制信息添加到在线药物信息数据库中的每个药物专著中,并将干预措施构建到电子病历(EMR)中。包括五种干预类型:取消限制,在药物名称中添加“仅限门诊使用”,订单特定问题,替代警报,以及将信息放入订单说明中,供订购提供者和验证药剂师查看。对药剂师进行了有关限制药物对齐倡议的教育。教育结束后进行了一项调查,以评估获得限制药物信息的难易程度和药物限制的清晰度。由于该项目的范围,教育和调查管理仅限于药师。结果:药物限制从11%增加到100%。在未统一的110种药物限制中,17种限制被取消,37种药物仅限门诊使用,56种限制药物在整个卫生系统中进一步统一。调查结果显示,更多的药师利用在线用药信息数据库查找限制用药信息,并且更多的药师查找限制用药信息更容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信