Effect of Wild Lactobacillus buchneri Strains on the Fermentation Profile and Microbial Populations of Sugarcane Silage.

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Leandro D da Silva, Odilon G Pereira, João P S Roseira, Mariele C N Agarussi, Vanessa P da Silva, Thiago C da Silva, Eliana Dos S Leandro, Rosinéa A de Paula, Stefanie A Santos, Karina G Ribeiro, Sebastião de C V Filho
{"title":"Effect of Wild Lactobacillus buchneri Strains on the Fermentation Profile and Microbial Populations of Sugarcane Silage.","authors":"Leandro D da Silva,&nbsp;Odilon G Pereira,&nbsp;João P S Roseira,&nbsp;Mariele C N Agarussi,&nbsp;Vanessa P da Silva,&nbsp;Thiago C da Silva,&nbsp;Eliana Dos S Leandro,&nbsp;Rosinéa A de Paula,&nbsp;Stefanie A Santos,&nbsp;Karina G Ribeiro,&nbsp;Sebastião de C V Filho","doi":"10.2174/2212798410666190128101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugarcane silage has been increasing as a feed in the tropics by dairy farmers. However, sugarcane normally had high yeast population that leads to intense alcoholic fermentation and excessive Dry-Matter (DM) loss during ensilage and after air exposure, as well. There are several patents that have recently shown the benefits of applying Lactobacillus buchneri in forage preservation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the changes in pH, DM, Water-Soluble Carbohydrates (WSC) and fermentation end product concentrations that occur in sugarcane silage with or without inoculation with L. buchneri after 45 days of ensiling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sugarcane plants were harvested with approximately 16 months of growth and chopped at 2 cm. Four strains of wild L. buchneri (56.1, 56.4, 56.9 and 56.26) and the commercial inoculant \"Lalsil Cana\" were evaluated. For all treatments, the theoretical application rate was 1.0 × 106 colony- forming units (cfu) per g of fresh weight. Data from the silo openings were analysed as a completely randomized design, with four replicates per treatment (inoculants).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment with L. buchneri affected the DM content, pH, Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) population, DM recovery, and concentrations of WSC, lactic acid, acetic acid and ethanol of sugarcane silage after 45 days of ensiling. Yeasts and molds populations and the concentrations of propionic and butyric acids were not affected by the treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lactobacillus buchneri 56.1 and 56.4 are considered the most suitable strains for improving the fermentation of sugarcane silage and thus are potential inoculants for silage production. At present, we are preparing the patent application.</p>","PeriodicalId":21061,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on food, nutrition & agriculture","volume":"11 1","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/2212798410666190128101343","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on food, nutrition & agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2212798410666190128101343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Sugarcane silage has been increasing as a feed in the tropics by dairy farmers. However, sugarcane normally had high yeast population that leads to intense alcoholic fermentation and excessive Dry-Matter (DM) loss during ensilage and after air exposure, as well. There are several patents that have recently shown the benefits of applying Lactobacillus buchneri in forage preservation.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the changes in pH, DM, Water-Soluble Carbohydrates (WSC) and fermentation end product concentrations that occur in sugarcane silage with or without inoculation with L. buchneri after 45 days of ensiling.

Methods: Sugarcane plants were harvested with approximately 16 months of growth and chopped at 2 cm. Four strains of wild L. buchneri (56.1, 56.4, 56.9 and 56.26) and the commercial inoculant "Lalsil Cana" were evaluated. For all treatments, the theoretical application rate was 1.0 × 106 colony- forming units (cfu) per g of fresh weight. Data from the silo openings were analysed as a completely randomized design, with four replicates per treatment (inoculants).

Results: The treatment with L. buchneri affected the DM content, pH, Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) population, DM recovery, and concentrations of WSC, lactic acid, acetic acid and ethanol of sugarcane silage after 45 days of ensiling. Yeasts and molds populations and the concentrations of propionic and butyric acids were not affected by the treatments.

Conclusion: Lactobacillus buchneri 56.1 and 56.4 are considered the most suitable strains for improving the fermentation of sugarcane silage and thus are potential inoculants for silage production. At present, we are preparing the patent application.

野生布氏乳杆菌菌株对甘蔗青贮发酵特性和微生物种群的影响。
背景:在热带地区,甘蔗青贮饲料被奶农越来越多地用作饲料。然而,甘蔗通常具有高酵母种群,导致在青贮期间和暴露于空气后强烈的酒精发酵和过量的干物质(DM)损失。最近有几项专利显示了在饲料保存中应用布氏乳杆菌的好处。目的:研究接种或未接种布氏乳杆菌的甘蔗青贮45 d后pH、DM、水溶性碳水化合物(WSC)和发酵终产物浓度的变化。方法:甘蔗植株生长约16个月后采收,切至2厘米处。对4株野生布氏乳杆菌(56.1、56.4、56.9和56.26)和商业接种剂“拉尔西尔Cana”进行了评价。所有处理的理论施用量为每克鲜重1.0 × 106菌落形成单位(cfu)。采用完全随机设计分析筒仓开口的数据,每个处理(接种剂)有4个重复。结果:布氏乳杆菌处理影响了青贮45 d后甘蔗青贮的DM含量、pH、乳酸菌数量、DM回收率以及WSC、乳酸、乙酸和乙醇浓度。酵母菌和霉菌的数量以及丙酸和丁酸的浓度不受处理的影响。结论:布氏乳杆菌56.1和56.4是改善甘蔗青贮发酵的最佳菌株,是潜在的青贮生产接种剂。目前我们正在准备专利申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recent patents on food, nutrition & agriculture
Recent patents on food, nutrition & agriculture Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信