Fluid Flow Patterns Through Drainage Catheters: Clinical Observations in 99 Patients.

Matthew C Pope, David H Ballard, Alan L Sticker, Scott Adams, Chaitanya Ahuja, Horacio B D'Agostino
{"title":"Fluid Flow Patterns Through Drainage Catheters: Clinical Observations in 99 Patients.","authors":"Matthew C Pope, David H Ballard, Alan L Sticker, Scott Adams, Chaitanya Ahuja, Horacio B D'Agostino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe patterns of fluid flow through locking pigtail and biliary catheters in patients that underwent biliary and abdominopelvic fluid drainage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contrast movement through catheter sideholes in pigtail and biliary catheters was evaluated retrospectively using sinograms and cholangiograms at 7-10 days post insertion. Dilute contrast injected through the catheter was evaluated by following flow through the catheter shaft and exit from side holes within the body cavity. Exit of contrast through side holes was appreciated and recorded. Included patients underwent biliary and abdominopelvic fluid drainage using 10.2-F catheters. Exclusion criteria included masking of contrast flow through sideholes by catheter angulation, contrast pooling or other imaging artifacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent evaluation of contrast flow through pigtail (n = 81) and biliary (n = 18) catheters. For pigtail and biliary catheters, 91/99 cases (91.9%) showed contrast exiting the catheter from only the sidehole located most proximally to the catheter hub. In 6/99 cases (6.1%) contrast exited no further than the second most proximal sidehole. In 2/99 cases (2.0%) contrast exited no further than the third most proximal sidehole. In no cases was contrast observed exiting from distal sideholes beyond the third most proximal sidehole.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retrograde contrast injection through catheters suggests that the majority of the contribution to total output in drainage catheters comes from the most proximal side hole. Contribution of distal side holes to total drainage is negligible or non-existent, therefore the distal segment of the catheter may be considered non-functional.</p>","PeriodicalId":22855,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6347390/pdf/nihms-1006497.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe patterns of fluid flow through locking pigtail and biliary catheters in patients that underwent biliary and abdominopelvic fluid drainage.

Methods: Contrast movement through catheter sideholes in pigtail and biliary catheters was evaluated retrospectively using sinograms and cholangiograms at 7-10 days post insertion. Dilute contrast injected through the catheter was evaluated by following flow through the catheter shaft and exit from side holes within the body cavity. Exit of contrast through side holes was appreciated and recorded. Included patients underwent biliary and abdominopelvic fluid drainage using 10.2-F catheters. Exclusion criteria included masking of contrast flow through sideholes by catheter angulation, contrast pooling or other imaging artifacts.

Results: A total of 99 patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent evaluation of contrast flow through pigtail (n = 81) and biliary (n = 18) catheters. For pigtail and biliary catheters, 91/99 cases (91.9%) showed contrast exiting the catheter from only the sidehole located most proximally to the catheter hub. In 6/99 cases (6.1%) contrast exited no further than the second most proximal sidehole. In 2/99 cases (2.0%) contrast exited no further than the third most proximal sidehole. In no cases was contrast observed exiting from distal sideholes beyond the third most proximal sidehole.

Conclusion: Retrograde contrast injection through catheters suggests that the majority of the contribution to total output in drainage catheters comes from the most proximal side hole. Contribution of distal side holes to total drainage is negligible or non-existent, therefore the distal segment of the catheter may be considered non-functional.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过引流导管的液体流动模式:99 例患者的临床观察
目的:描述接受胆道和腹盆腔液体引流术的患者通过锁尾导管和胆道导管的液体流动模式:方法:使用插入后 7-10 天的静脉窦造影和胆管造影,对造影剂通过猪尾导管和胆道导管侧孔的流动情况进行回顾性评估。通过跟踪流经导管轴和从体腔内侧孔流出的情况,对通过导管注入的稀释对比剂进行评估。对造影剂从侧孔流出的情况进行观察和记录。纳入的患者使用 10.2-F 导管进行了胆道和腹盆腔液体引流。排除标准包括导管角度遮挡造影剂流经侧孔、造影剂汇集或其他成像伪影:共有 99 名符合纳入标准的患者接受了通过尾纤导管(81 人)和胆道导管(18 人)的造影剂流评估。对于尾纤导管和胆道导管,91/99 个病例(91.9%)显示造影剂仅从导管毂最靠近的侧孔流出。在 6/99 个病例(6.1%)中,造影剂仅从第二近端侧孔流出。在 2/99 个病例(2.0%)中,造影剂流出的位置不超过第三近端侧孔。没有观察到造影剂从远端侧孔流出超过第三近端侧孔:结论:通过导管逆行注射对比剂表明,引流导管总输出量的大部分来自最近端侧孔。远端侧孔对总排水量的贡献微乎其微或根本不存在,因此可以认为导管的远端部分不起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信