Neovascularization Perfusion of Melolabial Flaps Using Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography.

Q1 Medicine
Mohamed Abdelwahab, Emily A Spataro, Cherian K Kandathil, Sam P Most
{"title":"Neovascularization Perfusion of Melolabial Flaps Using Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography.","authors":"Mohamed Abdelwahab,&nbsp;Emily A Spataro,&nbsp;Cherian K Kandathil,&nbsp;Sam P Most","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Assessment of melolabial flap perfusion using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for nasal reconstruction has not been previously described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess melolabial flap relative perfusion using ICG angiography in nasal reconstruction and highlight its clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this retrospective case series at a tertiary referral center, 10 patients undergoing melolabial flap reconstruction of nasal defects between January 2015 to April 2018 with flap perfusion were assessed by ICG angiography.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Indocyanine green angiography was performed to assess melolabial flap perfusion at second stage surgery after temporary clamping of the pedicle and after pedicle division and flap inset.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Flap perfusion in relation to a reference point on the cheek was calculated after both pedicle clamping and division by 2 methods: (1) ingress (arterial inflow) and egress (venous outflow) flap-to-cheek ratio; (2) flap-to-cheek perfusion (fluorescence) ratio at 3 time points (midpoint of ICG flap inflow, maximum [peak] fluorescence, and midpoint of ICG outflow), and their calculated mean. Correlations of perfusion with time between stages, and patient factors were performed; perfusion parameters after temporary pedicle clamping and after division and flap inset were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [7.5] years) were enrolled with a mean (SD) interval of 23 (4) days between first and second surgery. No correlation existed between perfusion parameters and time interval between first and second stage, or any other patient factors. Of the different perfusion parameters, a statistically significant difference was observed when comparing temporary clamping and postdivision mean (SD) flap-to-cheek perfusion ratio (0.89 [0.22] and 0.80 [0.19]; 95% CI, 4.1-12.6; P = .001), as well as mean (SD) peak perfusion ratio (0.81 [0.2] and 0.77 [0.2]; 95% CI, 0.005-0.080; P = .02) only. No partial or complete flap necrosis was reported after pedicle division.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Indocyanine green angiography is an effective method to determine neovascularization perfusion of melolabial flaps, with a mean perfusion of 89% after pedicle clamping. Future applications of this technology include use in patients at high risk for flap necrosis, or those who may benefit from early flap division to ensure adequate perfusion and minimize the time interval between staged procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 3","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1874","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Importance: Assessment of melolabial flap perfusion using indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for nasal reconstruction has not been previously described.

Objective: To assess melolabial flap relative perfusion using ICG angiography in nasal reconstruction and highlight its clinical relevance.

Design, setting, and participants: In this retrospective case series at a tertiary referral center, 10 patients undergoing melolabial flap reconstruction of nasal defects between January 2015 to April 2018 with flap perfusion were assessed by ICG angiography.

Exposures: Indocyanine green angiography was performed to assess melolabial flap perfusion at second stage surgery after temporary clamping of the pedicle and after pedicle division and flap inset.

Main outcomes and measures: Flap perfusion in relation to a reference point on the cheek was calculated after both pedicle clamping and division by 2 methods: (1) ingress (arterial inflow) and egress (venous outflow) flap-to-cheek ratio; (2) flap-to-cheek perfusion (fluorescence) ratio at 3 time points (midpoint of ICG flap inflow, maximum [peak] fluorescence, and midpoint of ICG outflow), and their calculated mean. Correlations of perfusion with time between stages, and patient factors were performed; perfusion parameters after temporary pedicle clamping and after division and flap inset were compared.

Results: Ten patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [7.5] years) were enrolled with a mean (SD) interval of 23 (4) days between first and second surgery. No correlation existed between perfusion parameters and time interval between first and second stage, or any other patient factors. Of the different perfusion parameters, a statistically significant difference was observed when comparing temporary clamping and postdivision mean (SD) flap-to-cheek perfusion ratio (0.89 [0.22] and 0.80 [0.19]; 95% CI, 4.1-12.6; P = .001), as well as mean (SD) peak perfusion ratio (0.81 [0.2] and 0.77 [0.2]; 95% CI, 0.005-0.080; P = .02) only. No partial or complete flap necrosis was reported after pedicle division.

Conclusions and relevance: Indocyanine green angiography is an effective method to determine neovascularization perfusion of melolabial flaps, with a mean perfusion of 89% after pedicle clamping. Future applications of this technology include use in patients at high risk for flap necrosis, or those who may benefit from early flap division to ensure adequate perfusion and minimize the time interval between staged procedures.

Level of evidence: NA.

Abstract Image

术中吲哚菁绿血管造影在唇瓣新生血管灌注中的应用。
重要性:使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)血管造影术评估鼻重建的唇瓣灌注尚未有报道。目的:探讨ICG血管造影在鼻部再造术中的应用价值及临床意义。设计、环境和参与者:在该三级转诊中心的回顾性病例系列中,2015年1月至2018年4月期间,10例患者接受唇瓣鼻部缺损重建,皮瓣灌注通过ICG血管造影进行评估。暴露:在临时夹紧椎弓根和椎弓根分割并置入皮瓣后的第二期手术中,采用吲哚菁绿血管造影评估踝瓣的灌注情况。主要结果和措施:通过2种方法(1)入口(动脉流入)和出口(静脉流出)皮瓣与脸颊的比值,计算皮瓣夹紧和分割后与脸颊参考点相关的血流灌注;(2) 3个时间点(ICG皮瓣流入中点、最大荧光[峰]点、ICG流出中点)皮瓣-颊灌注(荧光)比及其计算平均值。观察灌注与分期间时间和患者因素的相关性;比较临时椎弓根夹紧后与分割皮瓣置入后的灌注参数。结果:纳入10例患者(平均[SD]年龄66[7.5]岁),第一次和第二次手术的平均(SD)间隔为23(4)天。灌注参数与一、二期时间间隔及其他患者因素均无相关性。在不同的灌注参数中,比较临时夹持和术后皮瓣与面颊的平均灌注比(SD),差异有统计学意义(0.89[0.22]和0.80 [0.19]);95% ci, 4.1-12.6;P = .001),平均(SD)峰值灌注比分别为0.81[0.2]和0.77 [0.2];95% ci, 0.005-0.080;P = .02)。蒂分裂后皮瓣未见部分或完全坏死。结论及意义:吲哚菁绿血管造影是测定唇瓣新生血管灌注的有效方法,夹根后平均灌注为89%。该技术的未来应用包括用于皮瓣坏死高风险的患者,或那些可能受益于早期皮瓣分裂以确保足够的灌注并缩短分阶段手术之间的时间间隔的患者。证据等级:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信