Peri-implantitis risk factors: A prospective evaluation

Q1 Medicine

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2019-02-07 DOI:10.1111/jicd.12398

Anthony Mazel, Souad Belkacemi, Patrick Tavitian, Grégory Stéphan, Delphine Tardivo, Jean Hugues Catherine, Gérard Aboudharam

{"title":"Peri-implantitis risk factors: A prospective evaluation","authors":"Anthony Mazel, Souad Belkacemi, Patrick Tavitian, Grégory Stéphan, Delphine Tardivo, Jean Hugues Catherine, Gérard Aboudharam","doi":"10.1111/jicd.12398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the present study was to create a tool to evaluate the risk of peri-implantitis according its severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>After ethics committee approval, 43 patients provided signed consent and were included prospectively. Forty-five observations were recorded. The following criteria were recorded: number of implant faces showing bleeding and/or suppuration, pocket depth on at least two faces of the implant, bone loss as a function of the length of the implant evaluated on X-rays, number of implant faces with bacterial plaque, the parameters required for determination of excess cement (screwed or sealed prosthesis, burying of sealed prostheses), periodontal status, glycemia, and annual consumption of tobacco. Each of these parameters was plotted on a chart using Microsoft Excel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen of 45 (37.8%) cases were identified as having high peri-implantitis risk, two of 45 (4.4%) had low risk, and 11 of 45 (24.4%) had moderate risk; 33.3% patients did not have peri-implantitis and were considered at very low risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The observed results applied to the evaluation model are an effective diagnostic tool in assessing the risk of peri-implantitis. The tool takes into account parameters, which have not been taken into account until now. The information is automatically processed and allows early management of peri-implantitis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jicd.12398","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to create a tool to evaluate the risk of peri-implantitis according its severity.

Methods

After ethics committee approval, 43 patients provided signed consent and were included prospectively. Forty-five observations were recorded. The following criteria were recorded: number of implant faces showing bleeding and/or suppuration, pocket depth on at least two faces of the implant, bone loss as a function of the length of the implant evaluated on X-rays, number of implant faces with bacterial plaque, the parameters required for determination of excess cement (screwed or sealed prosthesis, burying of sealed prostheses), periodontal status, glycemia, and annual consumption of tobacco. Each of these parameters was plotted on a chart using Microsoft Excel.

Results

Seventeen of 45 (37.8%) cases were identified as having high peri-implantitis risk, two of 45 (4.4%) had low risk, and 11 of 45 (24.4%) had moderate risk; 33.3% patients did not have peri-implantitis and were considered at very low risk.

Conclusion

The observed results applied to the evaluation model are an effective diagnostic tool in assessing the risk of peri-implantitis. The tool takes into account parameters, which have not been taken into account until now. The information is automatically processed and allows early management of peri-implantitis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

种植体周围炎危险因素:前瞻性评价

目的本研究的目的是建立一种工具，根据其严重程度来评估种植体周围炎的风险。方法经伦理委员会批准，43例患者签署同意，纳入前瞻性研究。记录了45次观察。记录以下标准:出现出血和/或化脓的种植体面数，至少两面种植体的口袋深度，x射线评估的种植体长度的骨损失，有细菌菌斑的种植体面数，确定过量水泥所需的参数(螺钉或密封的假体，密封假体的掩埋)，牙周状况，血糖和年烟草消费量。每个参数都用Microsoft Excel绘制在图表上。结果45例患者中，高危17例(37.8%)，低危2例(4.4%)，中度危11例(24.4%);33.3%的患者没有种植体周围炎，被认为是非常低的风险。结论该评价模型的观察结果是评估种植体周围炎风险的有效诊断工具。该工具考虑了参数，这些参数直到现在还没有被考虑到。这些信息被自动处理，并允许种植体周围炎的早期管理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry (JICD) aims to publish quality, peer reviewed original research and topical reviews on all aspects of investigative and clinical dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Although international in outlook, the Editor especially encourages papers from the Asia Pacific. The journal also aims to provide clinicians, scientists and students of dentistry with a knowledge transfer platform for rapid publication of reports through an international journal, which will be available free online until 2012. Its scope, therefore, is broad, inclusive and international, but with a particular focus on Asia Pacific. The Editor welcomes manuscripts in the following key thematic areas in oral and maxillofacial sciences: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Conservative Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials, Dental Pedagogy, Endodontics and Traumatology, Implant Dentistry, Oral Biosciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Orthodontics, Oral Radiology, Oral Rehabilitation, Paedodontics, Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine.