Surgical Treatment of Proximal Segmental Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-01-02 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/2976091
Srdjan Babić, Slobodan Tanasković, Mihailo Nešković, Predrag Gajin, Dragoslav Nenezić, Predrag Stevanović, Nikola Aleksić, Milorad Ševković, Nenad Ilijevski, Predrag Matić, Petar Popov, Goran Vučurević, Dragana Unić-Stojanović, Djordje Radak
{"title":"Surgical Treatment of Proximal Segmental Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery.","authors":"Srdjan Babić, Slobodan Tanasković, Mihailo Nešković, Predrag Gajin, Dragoslav Nenezić, Predrag Stevanović, Nikola Aleksić, Milorad Ševković, Nenad Ilijevski, Predrag Matić, Petar Popov, Goran Vučurević, Dragana Unić-Stojanović, Djordje Radak","doi":"10.1155/2019/2976091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in patients with type II internal carotid artery occlusions, including the long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2008 to August 2015, 74 consecutive patients (48 men with a mean age of 65.1 ± 8.06 years) underwent carotid endarterectomy because of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusions. These were verified with preoperative carotid duplex scans (CDS) and CT angiography (CTA). Also, brain CT scanning was performed in all these patients. The indication for treatment was made jointly by a vascular surgeon, neurologist, and an interventional radiologist in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) context. After successful treatment, all the patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, then every 6 months thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common symptom at presentation was transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 49 patients (66.2%), followed by stroke in the past six months in the 17 remaining patients (23%). Revascularisation of the ICA with endarterectomy techniques was performed successfully in all the patients with an average clamp time of 11.9 min. All the procedures were performed under general anaesthesia in combination with a superficial cervical block. The early complication rate was 8.1% and included two cardiac events (2.7%) (one rhythm disorder and one acute coronary syndrome), three TIAs (4.1%), and one intracerebral hemorrhage (1.3%). Only one patient with the intracerebral hemorrhage died 5 days after surgery giving a postoperative mortality of 1.3% for this series. During the follow-up period (mean 50.4 ± 31.3 months), the primary patency rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 98.4%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 82.9%, respectively. Likewise, the survival rates were 98.7%, 96.8%, 89%, and 77.6%, respectively. Ultrasound Doppler controls during follow-up detected 8 ICA restenoses; however, only 3 of these patients required further endovascular treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusion is a safe and effective procedure associated with acceptable risk and good long-term results. Therefore, the current guidelines which do not recommend carotid endarterectomy in this patient group should be reassessed, with the requirement for ongoing large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare CEA with best medical therapy in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2019 ","pages":"2976091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2976091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To present the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in patients with type II internal carotid artery occlusions, including the long-term outcomes.

Methods: From March 2008 to August 2015, 74 consecutive patients (48 men with a mean age of 65.1 ± 8.06 years) underwent carotid endarterectomy because of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusions. These were verified with preoperative carotid duplex scans (CDS) and CT angiography (CTA). Also, brain CT scanning was performed in all these patients. The indication for treatment was made jointly by a vascular surgeon, neurologist, and an interventional radiologist in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) context. After successful treatment, all the patients were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, then every 6 months thereafter.

Results: The most common symptom at presentation was transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 49 patients (66.2%), followed by stroke in the past six months in the 17 remaining patients (23%). Revascularisation of the ICA with endarterectomy techniques was performed successfully in all the patients with an average clamp time of 11.9 min. All the procedures were performed under general anaesthesia in combination with a superficial cervical block. The early complication rate was 8.1% and included two cardiac events (2.7%) (one rhythm disorder and one acute coronary syndrome), three TIAs (4.1%), and one intracerebral hemorrhage (1.3%). Only one patient with the intracerebral hemorrhage died 5 days after surgery giving a postoperative mortality of 1.3% for this series. During the follow-up period (mean 50.4 ± 31.3 months), the primary patency rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 98.4%, 94.9%, 92.9%, and 82.9%, respectively. Likewise, the survival rates were 98.7%, 96.8%, 89%, and 77.6%, respectively. Ultrasound Doppler controls during follow-up detected 8 ICA restenoses; however, only 3 of these patients required further endovascular treatment.

Conclusions: Carotid endarterectomy of internal carotid artery (ICA) segmental occlusion is a safe and effective procedure associated with acceptable risk and good long-term results. Therefore, the current guidelines which do not recommend carotid endarterectomy in this patient group should be reassessed, with the requirement for ongoing large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare CEA with best medical therapy in this patient cohort.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颈内动脉近端节段性闭塞的手术治疗。
目的:介绍颈动脉内膜切除术在II型颈内动脉闭塞患者中的可行性、安全性和有效性,包括长期疗效:2008年3月至2015年8月,74名连续患者(48名男性,平均年龄(65.1±8.06)岁)因颈内动脉(ICA)节段性闭塞而接受了颈动脉内膜切除术。术前通过颈动脉双相扫描(CDS)和 CT 血管造影(CTA)进行了验证。此外,还对所有患者进行了脑部 CT 扫描。治疗指征由血管外科医生、神经科医生和介入放射科医生在多学科团队(MDT)的背景下共同制定。治疗成功后,对所有患者分别进行了1、3、6和12个月的随访,之后每6个月随访一次:49名患者(66.2%)发病时最常见的症状是短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA),其余17名患者(23%)在过去6个月中曾发生中风。采用动脉内膜切除术对所有患者成功进行了 ICA 血管再通手术,平均钳夹时间为 11.9 分钟。所有手术均在全身麻醉和颈浅阻滞下进行。早期并发症发生率为8.1%,包括2例心脏事件(2.7%)(1例心律失常和1例急性冠状动脉综合征)、3例TIA(4.1%)和1例脑出血(1.3%)。只有一名脑出血患者在术后 5 天死亡,因此该系列手术的术后死亡率为 1.3%。在随访期间(平均 50.4 ± 31.3 个月),1、3、5 和 7 年的初次通畅率分别为 98.4%、94.9%、92.9% 和 82.9%。同样,存活率分别为 98.7%、96.8%、89% 和 77.6%。随访期间的超声多普勒检查发现了8处ICA再狭窄,但其中只有3名患者需要进一步接受血管内治疗:结论:颈内动脉(ICA)节段性闭塞的颈动脉内膜剥脱术是一种安全有效的手术,风险可接受,长期效果良好。因此,目前的指南不建议对这一患者群体进行颈动脉内膜剥脱术,应对此进行重新评估,并要求持续开展大规模随机对照试验,对这一患者群体的颈动脉内膜剥脱术与最佳药物治疗进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信