{"title":"Three Critical Elements for Real-Time Monitoring of Implementation and Adaptation of Prevention Programs.","authors":"Melissa E DeRosier","doi":"10.1007/s10935-019-00538-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We are at a place in history where the prevention science literature has established a cadre of evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) that have been proven, under controlled efficacy and effectiveness trials, to significantly improve the well-being of those served. Research in implementation science has also repeatedly demonstrated the importance of fidelity for realizing the benefits of these EBPPs when applied in real-world contexts. However, as a field, while we have ever-increasing evidence of 'what' systems and supports are needed to take EBPPs to scale, we continue to struggle with 'how' to successfully bring them to scale with quality in real-world service settings. The articles in this special issue of The Journal of Primary Prevention (JPP) further our understanding of the dimensions that need to be considered when scaling EBPPs and help inform what a scalable implementation support system would entail. The following commentary discusses implications for such a system and presents an example of using technology to support scaling up EBPPs while maintaining program fidelity and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":"40 1","pages":"129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10935-019-00538-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00538-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
We are at a place in history where the prevention science literature has established a cadre of evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) that have been proven, under controlled efficacy and effectiveness trials, to significantly improve the well-being of those served. Research in implementation science has also repeatedly demonstrated the importance of fidelity for realizing the benefits of these EBPPs when applied in real-world contexts. However, as a field, while we have ever-increasing evidence of 'what' systems and supports are needed to take EBPPs to scale, we continue to struggle with 'how' to successfully bring them to scale with quality in real-world service settings. The articles in this special issue of The Journal of Primary Prevention (JPP) further our understanding of the dimensions that need to be considered when scaling EBPPs and help inform what a scalable implementation support system would entail. The following commentary discusses implications for such a system and presents an example of using technology to support scaling up EBPPs while maintaining program fidelity and quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prevention is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes manuscripts aimed at reducing negative social and health outcomes and promoting human health and well-being. It publishes high-quality research that discusses evidence-based interventions, policies, and practices. The editions cover a wide range of prevention science themes and value diverse populations, age groups, and methodologies. Our target audiences are prevention scientists, practitioners, and policymakers from diverse geographic locations. Specific types of papers published in the journal include Original Research, Research Methods, Practitioner Narrative, Debate, Brief Reports, Letter to the Editor, Policy, and Reviews. The selection of articles for publication is based on their innovation, contribution to the field of prevention, and quality. The Journal of Prevention differs from other similar journals in the field by offering a more culturally and geographically diverse team of editors, a broader range of subjects and methodologies, and the intention to attract the readership of prevention practitioners and other stakeholders (alongside scientists).