Comparison of anthropometric, cardiovascular, autonomic, baroreflex sensitivity, aerobic fitness, inflammatory markers and oxidative stress parameters between first degree relatives of diabetes and controls.

IF 3.4
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.047
Vivek Kumar Sharma, Hanumanthappa Nandeesha, Kolar Vishwanath Vinod, Senthil Kumar Subramanian, Devanarayanan Siva Sankar, Rajathi Rajendran
{"title":"Comparison of anthropometric, cardiovascular, autonomic, baroreflex sensitivity, aerobic fitness, inflammatory markers and oxidative stress parameters between first degree relatives of diabetes and controls.","authors":"Vivek Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Hanumanthappa Nandeesha,&nbsp;Kolar Vishwanath Vinod,&nbsp;Senthil Kumar Subramanian,&nbsp;Devanarayanan Siva Sankar,&nbsp;Rajathi Rajendran","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed at assessing cardiovascular risk of first degree relatives of diabetes (FDRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross sectional study involving 90 apparently healthy normoglycemic volunteers aged between 15 and 50 years (45 FDRD and 45 FDRs of non-diabetics). We measured anthropometric parameters, baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate variability, cardiac autonomic function tests, and aerobic capacity, fasting blood glucose and insulin, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, nitric oxide and oxidative stress markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDRD had significantly higher hip circumference and BF%. Blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and cardiac output were comparable. FDRD had higher HR and rate pressure product. There were no significant differences in cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2max) and physical activity level. Time and Frequency domain parameters were comparable except for reduced NN50 and total power. Baroreflex sensitivity, 30:15 ratio and E: I ratio were significantly less in FDRD. Fasting glucose was comparable. Fasting Insulin, HOMA IR, HOMA %B and HOMA AD were higher while HOMA %S and QUICKI index were lower in FDRD. Lipid profile or lipid derived parameters were comparable except for higher non-HDLc in FDRD. Adiponectin was lower while Leptin and Leptin/apidonectin ratio was higher in FDRD. IL-6, hsCRP, TNF- alpha and MDA were significantly higher in FDRD, while TAS and nitric oxide were significantly lower in FDRD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher body fat percentage, with insulin resistance, deranged cardiac autonomic function, higher oxidative stress and inflammation, lower adiponectin and nitric oxide levels places FDRD at higher cardiovascular risk and necessitates early lifestyle modification/intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":520602,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & metabolic syndrome","volume":" ","pages":"652-658"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.047","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & metabolic syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim: We aimed at assessing cardiovascular risk of first degree relatives of diabetes (FDRD).

Methods: A cross sectional study involving 90 apparently healthy normoglycemic volunteers aged between 15 and 50 years (45 FDRD and 45 FDRs of non-diabetics). We measured anthropometric parameters, baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate variability, cardiac autonomic function tests, and aerobic capacity, fasting blood glucose and insulin, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, nitric oxide and oxidative stress markers.

Results: FDRD had significantly higher hip circumference and BF%. Blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and cardiac output were comparable. FDRD had higher HR and rate pressure product. There were no significant differences in cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2max) and physical activity level. Time and Frequency domain parameters were comparable except for reduced NN50 and total power. Baroreflex sensitivity, 30:15 ratio and E: I ratio were significantly less in FDRD. Fasting glucose was comparable. Fasting Insulin, HOMA IR, HOMA %B and HOMA AD were higher while HOMA %S and QUICKI index were lower in FDRD. Lipid profile or lipid derived parameters were comparable except for higher non-HDLc in FDRD. Adiponectin was lower while Leptin and Leptin/apidonectin ratio was higher in FDRD. IL-6, hsCRP, TNF- alpha and MDA were significantly higher in FDRD, while TAS and nitric oxide were significantly lower in FDRD.

Conclusion: Higher body fat percentage, with insulin resistance, deranged cardiac autonomic function, higher oxidative stress and inflammation, lower adiponectin and nitric oxide levels places FDRD at higher cardiovascular risk and necessitates early lifestyle modification/intervention.

糖尿病一级亲属与对照组的人体测量、心血管、自主神经、气压反射敏感性、有氧适能、炎症指标和氧化应激参数比较
目的:我们旨在评估糖尿病一级亲属(FDRD)的心血管风险。方法:对90名表面健康、血糖正常的志愿者进行横断面研究,年龄在15 ~ 50岁之间,其中fdr组45名,非糖尿病组45名。我们测量了人体测量参数、气压反射敏感性、心率变异性、心脏自主功能测试、有氧能力、空腹血糖和胰岛素、血脂、炎症标志物、一氧化氮和氧化应激标志物。结果:FDRD组臀围和BF%明显增高。血压、总外周阻力和心输出量比较。FDRD具有较高的HR和速率压力积。心肺适能(VO2max)和体力活动水平无显著差异。除了NN50和总功率降低外,时域和频域参数可比较。FDRD患者的压力反射敏感性、30:15比率和E: I比率显著低于FDRD患者。空腹血糖是相似的。FDRD组空腹胰岛素、HOMA IR、HOMA %B、HOMA AD较高,HOMA %S、QUICKI指数较低。除了FDRD患者非hdlc较高外,脂质谱或脂质衍生参数具有可比性。FDRD患者脂联素较低,瘦素和瘦素/瘦联素比值较高。FDRD组IL-6、hsCRP、TNF- α和MDA显著升高,而TAS和一氧化氮显著降低。结论:较高的体脂率、胰岛素抵抗、心脏自主功能紊乱、氧化应激和炎症升高、脂联素和一氧化氮水平降低使FDRD具有较高的心血管风险,需要早期改变/干预生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书