A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the National Cancer Institute's Original and Revised Consent Form Templates.

IRB Pub Date : 2017-09-01
Holly A Masset, Michelle Hiser, Nancy L Atkinson, Christine Brittle, Robert Bailey, Jeanne Adler, Grace E Mishkin, Andrea M Denicoff, Nancy Roach, Marjorie Good, Danielle Burgess, Lorna Patrick, Margaret Mooney, Jeffrey S Abrams
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the National Cancer Institute's Original and Revised Consent Form Templates.","authors":"Holly A Masset,&nbsp;Michelle Hiser,&nbsp;Nancy L Atkinson,&nbsp;Christine Brittle,&nbsp;Robert Bailey,&nbsp;Jeanne Adler,&nbsp;Grace E Mishkin,&nbsp;Andrea M Denicoff,&nbsp;Nancy Roach,&nbsp;Marjorie Good,&nbsp;Danielle Burgess,&nbsp;Lorna Patrick,&nbsp;Margaret Mooney,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Abrams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1998, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has mandated that researchers use its consent form template in developing consent forms for their NCI-funded clinical trials. The template was substantially revised in 2013 to aid in the development of simpler, more concise consent forms. The NCI conducted a randomized controlled trial with cancer survivors (N = 153) to assess the revised template's effect on individuals' knowledge, satisfaction, clarity, and likelihood of joining a trial in the future. We found that the revised template resulted in equally high knowledge and satisfaction scores as the original template, but with fewer words and pages. The likelihood that an individual would participate in a trial diminished after he or she reviewed either the original or revised consent form, yet having knowledge about trials before reviewing the consent forms resulted in increased satisfaction. To ensure an informed decision-making process, we recommend using the revised NCI consent form template along with using educational interventions aimed at increasing the understanding potential participants have of a trial before they receive a consent form.</p>","PeriodicalId":73513,"journal":{"name":"IRB","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1998, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has mandated that researchers use its consent form template in developing consent forms for their NCI-funded clinical trials. The template was substantially revised in 2013 to aid in the development of simpler, more concise consent forms. The NCI conducted a randomized controlled trial with cancer survivors (N = 153) to assess the revised template's effect on individuals' knowledge, satisfaction, clarity, and likelihood of joining a trial in the future. We found that the revised template resulted in equally high knowledge and satisfaction scores as the original template, but with fewer words and pages. The likelihood that an individual would participate in a trial diminished after he or she reviewed either the original or revised consent form, yet having knowledge about trials before reviewing the consent forms resulted in increased satisfaction. To ensure an informed decision-making process, we recommend using the revised NCI consent form template along with using educational interventions aimed at increasing the understanding potential participants have of a trial before they receive a consent form.

一项比较国家癌症研究所原始和修订的同意书模板的随机对照研究。
自1998年以来,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)要求研究人员在为NCI资助的临床试验开发同意书时使用其同意书模板。该模板在2013年进行了大幅修订,以帮助制定更简单、更简洁的同意表格。NCI对癌症幸存者(N = 153)进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估修订后的模板对个人知识、满意度、清晰度和未来参加试验的可能性的影响。我们发现,修改后的模板与原始模板的知识和满意度得分一样高,但单词和页数更少。一个人在看过原始的或修改过的同意书后,他或她参加试验的可能性降低了,但在看过同意书之前了解了试验的知识,结果满意度增加了。为了确保一个知情的决策过程,我们建议使用修订后的NCI同意书模板,同时使用旨在增加潜在参与者在收到同意书之前对试验的理解的教育干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IRB
IRB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信