Closing the Regulatory Gap for Synthetic Nicotine Products.

Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-11
Patricia J Zettler, Natalie Hemmerich, Micah L Berman
{"title":"Closing the Regulatory Gap for Synthetic Nicotine Products.","authors":"Patricia J Zettler,&nbsp;Natalie Hemmerich,&nbsp;Micah L Berman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In July 2017 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a new \"comprehensive plan for tobacco and nicotine regulation.\" This plan is focused on making cigarettes less addictive while facilitating the development of alternative, and less-harmful, nicotine-containing products. This approach holds promise, and the public health stakes could not be higher-smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, resulting in roughly 480,000 deaths per year. But a new consumer product is emerging that could upset the FDA's plans for a well-balanced regulatory scheme: synthetic nicotine. These products currently fall into a regulatory gap because they fall outside the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act's (FDCA) definition of a tobacco product. If this gap remains in place, it is likely that more companies will exploit it in order to evade regulation, undoing the potential benefits of the FDA's plan for tobacco and nicotine regulation. This Article argues that the FDA can, and should, address this problem by regulating synthetic nicotine products as drugs. After reviewing the science of nicotine addiction and the FDA's past and present regulatory schemes for nicotine, it explains how the FDA could establish that synthetic nicotine products satisfy the FDCA's definition of a drug. It concludes with a discussion of the policy benefits of categorizing synthetic nicotine products as drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":80721,"journal":{"name":"Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School","volume":"59 6","pages":"1933-1982"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329380/pdf/nihms960307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In July 2017 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a new "comprehensive plan for tobacco and nicotine regulation." This plan is focused on making cigarettes less addictive while facilitating the development of alternative, and less-harmful, nicotine-containing products. This approach holds promise, and the public health stakes could not be higher-smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, resulting in roughly 480,000 deaths per year. But a new consumer product is emerging that could upset the FDA's plans for a well-balanced regulatory scheme: synthetic nicotine. These products currently fall into a regulatory gap because they fall outside the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act's (FDCA) definition of a tobacco product. If this gap remains in place, it is likely that more companies will exploit it in order to evade regulation, undoing the potential benefits of the FDA's plan for tobacco and nicotine regulation. This Article argues that the FDA can, and should, address this problem by regulating synthetic nicotine products as drugs. After reviewing the science of nicotine addiction and the FDA's past and present regulatory schemes for nicotine, it explains how the FDA could establish that synthetic nicotine products satisfy the FDCA's definition of a drug. It concludes with a discussion of the policy benefits of categorizing synthetic nicotine products as drugs.

缩小合成尼古丁产品的监管差距。
2017年7月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)宣布了一项新的“烟草和尼古丁监管综合计划”。该计划的重点是降低香烟的成瘾性,同时促进替代的、危害较小的含尼古丁产品的开发。这种方法很有希望,而且对公共卫生的利害关系也不可能更高——吸烟是美国可预防性死亡的主要原因,每年导致大约48万人死亡。但一种新的消费产品正在出现,可能会打乱FDA制定的平衡监管方案的计划:合成尼古丁。这些产品目前处于监管空白,因为它们不属于联邦食品、药物和化妆品法案(FDCA)对烟草产品的定义。如果这一差距继续存在,很可能会有更多的公司利用这一差距来逃避监管,从而抵消FDA烟草和尼古丁监管计划的潜在好处。本文认为,FDA可以,也应该通过将合成尼古丁产品作为药物进行监管来解决这一问题。在回顾了尼古丁成瘾的科学以及FDA过去和现在对尼古丁的监管方案之后,它解释了FDA如何能够确定合成尼古丁产品满足FDCA对药物的定义。最后讨论了将合成尼古丁产品归类为毒品的政策效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信