A Retrospective Cohort Study on Rehospitalization following Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2018-12-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/4879850
Colin Dunn, Emmanuel U Emeasoba, Michael Hung, Ari Holtzman, Eran Bellin, Stuart Greenstein
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study on Rehospitalization following Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Colin Dunn,&nbsp;Emmanuel U Emeasoba,&nbsp;Michael Hung,&nbsp;Ari Holtzman,&nbsp;Eran Bellin,&nbsp;Stuart Greenstein","doi":"10.1155/2018/4879850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are commonly used but are associated with increased graft failure. Graft failure is in turn related to rehospitalization within thirty days post transplant. Our goal was to determine whether ECD kidneys independently lead to rehospitalization within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years after transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult first-time recipients of deceased donor kidneys transplanted from 2003-2012 at our center were reviewed. Models included demographics, medical comorbidities, center for disease control high-risk kidney, ECD kidney, ischemia times, cause of renal failure, immunosuppressive regimen, positive psychiatric screening, alcoholism, surgeon, year the transplant was performed, years on dialysis before transplant, and the number of inpatient hospitalizations within 6 months prior to transplant. We conducted Andersen-Gill modeling and propensity score matching followed by logistic regression. We also used multivariable linear regression to predict average length of stay during rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More ECD patients had a rehospitalization at 1 year (70.3% versus 59%, log-rank test <i>p</i>=0.014). Thirty-day and 2-year time marks were not significant. Andersen-Gill models predicting successive hospitalizations yielded HR of 1.42 (<i>p</i>=0.002) and 1.32 (<i>p</i>=0.015) for ECD patients at 1 and 2 years of after transplantation, respectively. Propensity score matching and logistic regression showed a significant relative risk of 1.630 at one year (<i>p</i>=0.033) and 1.313 at two years (<i>p</i>=0.268). There was no significant association between ECD and subsequent lengths of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receiving an ECD kidney is independently associated with multiple readmissions within 2 years of transplant but unrelated to length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2018 ","pages":"4879850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4879850","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4879850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are commonly used but are associated with increased graft failure. Graft failure is in turn related to rehospitalization within thirty days post transplant. Our goal was to determine whether ECD kidneys independently lead to rehospitalization within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years after transplant.

Methods: All adult first-time recipients of deceased donor kidneys transplanted from 2003-2012 at our center were reviewed. Models included demographics, medical comorbidities, center for disease control high-risk kidney, ECD kidney, ischemia times, cause of renal failure, immunosuppressive regimen, positive psychiatric screening, alcoholism, surgeon, year the transplant was performed, years on dialysis before transplant, and the number of inpatient hospitalizations within 6 months prior to transplant. We conducted Andersen-Gill modeling and propensity score matching followed by logistic regression. We also used multivariable linear regression to predict average length of stay during rehospitalization.

Results: More ECD patients had a rehospitalization at 1 year (70.3% versus 59%, log-rank test p=0.014). Thirty-day and 2-year time marks were not significant. Andersen-Gill models predicting successive hospitalizations yielded HR of 1.42 (p=0.002) and 1.32 (p=0.015) for ECD patients at 1 and 2 years of after transplantation, respectively. Propensity score matching and logistic regression showed a significant relative risk of 1.630 at one year (p=0.033) and 1.313 at two years (p=0.268). There was no significant association between ECD and subsequent lengths of hospital stay.

Conclusion: Receiving an ECD kidney is independently associated with multiple readmissions within 2 years of transplant but unrelated to length of stay.

Abstract Image

扩大标准供肾移植后再住院的回顾性队列研究。
背景:扩大标准供体(ECD)肾脏是常用的,但与移植物衰竭增加有关。移植失败又与移植后30天内再次住院有关。我们的目的是确定ECD肾脏是否在移植后30天、1年和2年内独立导致再次住院。方法:回顾性分析我院2003-2012年首次接受死亡供肾移植的成人患者。模型包括人口统计学、医疗合并症、疾病控制中心高危肾、ECD肾、缺血次数、肾功能衰竭原因、免疫抑制方案、阳性精神筛查、酒精中毒、外科医生、移植年份、移植前透析年限、移植前6个月内住院次数。我们进行了Andersen-Gill模型和倾向评分匹配,然后进行了逻辑回归。我们也使用多变量线性回归预测再住院期间的平均住院时间。结果:更多的ECD患者在1年后再次住院(70.3%对59%,log-rank检验p=0.014)。30天和2年的时间标记不显著。安德森-吉尔模型预测移植后1年和2年ECD患者连续住院的风险比分别为1.42 (p=0.002)和1.32 (p=0.015)。倾向评分匹配和逻辑回归显示,1年时的相对危险度为1.630 (p=0.033), 2年时的相对危险度为1.313 (p=0.268)。ECD与随后的住院时间之间没有显著的关联。结论:接受ECD肾脏与移植2年内多次再入院独立相关,但与住院时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信